similar to: rice format

hello, I am now develloping an embeded decoding system for flac.I have a problem about the format of the rice coding: the residual begins with : 01 01 08 0C the first two bytes are the warmups, the prediction order is 2. and the 080C is the following: 00 0010 0000 001100 the first two bits mean: residual coding method is partitioned rice the following four bits mean: the partition order is 2 ;

Torsdag, 23 januar 2003, skrev Tor-Einar Jarnbjo <Tor-Einar_Jarnbjo@grosch- link.de>: >According to the format description, the coding method has to be 0. > >I've been using libFLAC 1.0.4 to encode the stream. I've checked my interpretation against "flac -a" and it seems to read 17 bits for each warmup sample. Here is its output: frame=168 blocksize=4608

Here's what I listed in that email. Merging doesn't appear to be necessary. If you have any build problems, let me know. Note that my detection code is Darwin-specific. It's a BSD call (sysctl()), so a change to the platform-detection macros should enable it to work on other BSDs. However, I don't know what that would be, and I couldn't determine any safe way to do the check

Dear Colleagues, Greetings from http://www.China-TravelGuide.com. Email Promoter - Currently a total more than 46,000 travel agents, tour operators and national tourist offices have been submitted to the China-TravelGuide.com. Swiftly and directly send your advertisement to more than 46,000 travel agents, tour operators and national tourist offices & build bridges for you and your new

Hi I'm building new samba server (on Debian 6.0, software RAID10 2TB, Xeon CPU). Generally everything is working fine, so I have decided to run some stress tests. My choice was dbench. Old server is Debian 4.0 (samba 3.0.24, Athlon 3000+, one ATA 160GB disk). So run dbench 16 on both old and new server The results are strange old serwer: about 300MB/sek (dbench 3.0) and below are first

hi guys/gals I realize that this question must have been asked before, I sroogled and found some posts on the web on how to tweak/tune gluster, however.. What I hope is that some experts and/or devel could write a bit more, maybe compose a doc on - How to investigate and trouble gluster's speed-performance bottleneck. Why I think such a thorough guide would be important? Well.. I guess

looks fine, I would suspect how the PCM sample are formatted and sent to process(), could you show that part of the code? Josh --- James Smith <jsmith@landmarkdigital.com> wrote: > > I'm using libFLACC++ and libFLAC and I think that I'm using the calls > in the > typical order (see code below). But every monoe or stereo file that > I send > thru I get files

Torsdag, 23 januar 2003, skrev Miroslav Lichvar <lichvarm@phoenix. inf.upol.cz>: >If input is 16 bit, side channel will be 17 bit (16bit - 16bit is >17bit number). And warmup samples will be (17 - wasted_bits) bit. Voila, this was the source of all my frustration, sync problems and who knows what. My decoder now works correctly for files encoded with the default settings. Are

I'm using libFLACC++ and libFLAC and I think that I'm using the calls in the typical order (see code below). But every monoe or stereo file that I send thru I get files that are the same sze as the orginal wave files. Doing a flac -a on the flac files I see that I get: frame=9 blocksize=4608 sample_rate=8000 channels=1 channel_assignment=INDEPENDENT subframe=0

--- Tor-Einar Jarnbjo <Tor-Einar_Jarnbjo@grosch-link.de> wrote: > Torsdag, 23 januar 2003, skrev Miroslav Lichvar <lichvarm@phoenix. > inf.upol.cz>: > > >If input is 16 bit, side channel will be 17 bit (16bit - 16bit is > >17bit number). And warmup samples will be (17 - wasted_bits) bit. > > Voila, this was the source of all my frustration, sync problems

On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 10:54:15PM -0800, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > > > I think I have an alternative fix for the CVE which should not break > > seeking. I'm working on getting an copy of the file with which to test. > > Patch applied and pushed. I think this revives the CVE, at least in some configurations. The patch seems to cover

> From: "James Bean" <james@hdcs.com.au> > Has anyone every setup an external open/close relay, off say a serial > interface, and have an extension trigger the relay? The following will do the trick. Just add a 5vdc solid state relay ('cause you can't sink too much current out of the RS232C port). Substitute "2", "4" or "6" in the

Hi all, I''m trying to get new tracker items to automatically send an email to this list, so I may run a couple of tests this week. You can ignore them. Heesob, can you please take a look at Bug 1806? I''m not sure if it''s possible or not, but it seems like a reasonable idea if it is. Regards, Dan __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Plan great

Hi Jean, > Actually, Speex has Packet Loss Concealment (PLC) > builtin. If a packet > is missing, instead of repeating the previous one, > just try decoding by > passing NULL instead of the SpeexBits struct. > Thanks, I have made the above changes and the effect seems to be better now. > > I think jitter buffering is more correct way to > solve > > this problem

This lpc_restore_order was partially inspired by Miroslav's affd, though my (not very great) ARM asm version resembled this, as well. The other two reduce CPU array indexing overhead in loops a little. Additionally, a request for help: My not very optimized lpc_restore_signal is at the below URL, I couldn't get the ldm* instructions to work as advertised, even though I've talked

Dear r-helpers, Here I would like to have your kind helps on generating Venn diagram. There are some packages within R on this task, like venneuler, VennDiagram, vennerable. But, vennerable can not be installed on my Mac book. It seems VennDiagram can not work on my data. And, venneuler may have generated a wrong Venn diagram to me. Do you have any experience/expertise on those Venn diagram?

Here's how I set up the data for processing: // For moving data into 32 bit shape uint8_t *buffer8 = NULL; uint16_t *buffer16 = NULL; uint32_t *buffer32 = NULL; unsigned sample32; unsigned sample, channel; uint32_t bitsPerSample = this->get_bits_per_sample(); numFrames = inData.GetSize();

Thanks Miroslav, for your help - much appreciated. > > RICE PARTITION SIZE: In a zero-partition-order Rice block, the > > documentation says the number of samples in the partition is equal > > to the frame's blocksize. Surely this should be equal to the > > frame's-blocksize-minus-the-predictor-order, since we shouldn't need > > to encode residual for

Hello you all, this is my first time on this forum because I recently started to learn this exciting "new" language and Frame stuff... anyway, I used to have Ruby 1.8.2 installed with Rails and I wrote some warmup applications on these. Yesterday I decided to update my Ruby and Rails... about 4-5 hours later I finished... it wasn''t easy but what is.. right? so I changed

On 7/11/2017 3:58 PM, Fred Smith wrote: > I faced the same issue some years ago, and found a low-priced mono > laser that lated me quite a few years. no color, but few thing I > wanted to print actually demanded color. my last two laser printers have been Brother black&white all-in-ones ("MFC"). *VERY* cheap per page printing costs, even if you use Brother brand toner