similar to: SunPro support

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2000 matches similar to: "SunPro support"

2001 Sep 26
2
openssh-2.9.9p2 session.c fails on Solaris 7,8 w/ SunPro C
FYI-- session.c fails from openSSH 2.9.9p2 with SunPro C compiler on Solaris 7, 8. The function do_pre_login had to be moved to before its use in do_exec_pty (a predeclaration would work). It does appear to work correctly, given the above fix. Still having the largefile problem (argh), so if anyone can help with /that/ ... -- Austin David -- Sr. Systems Architect Wink Communications
2014 Jul 11
0
New binary package set for EL6 x86_64
Hi users of EL6 based distributions, I'm pleased to announce a new alternative binary package repository for EL6 x86_64. The aim is to provide a supplemental set of packages which may contain software not included in your base system. These packages are based on pkgsrc, a cross-platform package manager. In this initial release there are 13,152 packages available. For now I am specifically
2009 Jan 28
5
pkgsrc provider for Package?
Hello I''m wondering if anyone has looked into adding pkgsrc package management as a provider for Package? We use Joyent accelerators (zones on OpenSolaris) for our many of our production services and about a year ago Joyent switched from Blastwave to pkgsrc for userland packages. pkgsrc catalog - http://pkgsrc.se/ pkgsrc guide - http://www.netbsd.org/docs/pkgsrc/ joyent pkgsrc
2006 Feb 06
1
Dovecot 1.0b2 now in pkgsrc packaging system
After months of testing in the "work in progress" pkgsrc-wip playground, dovecot-1.0b2 is now in the main pkgsrc mainline and will be tracked up through the 1.0 release and beyond. This means it's now much easier to get Dovecot 1.0 up and running on NetBSD and any other platform supported by pkgsrc (see www.pkgsrc.org); prior to this, 0.99.x was the newest available. Binary
2003 Jun 19
2
NetBSD pkgsrc maintanance
hi all, i've taken over the maintainership of dovecot's pkgsrc on NetBSD - please send me your ideas, questions and comments related to dovecot on NetBSD. FreeBSD's port has currently some more 'features' than the pkgsrc, i'm going to add some of them - any feedback is appreciated. bye, TOM -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
2009 Jun 25
2
Sieve/ManageSieve integration into pkgsrc
I'm integrating Sieve (the new one) and ManageSieve into wip/dovecot. Currently, this works as dovecot options because dovecot must be built before sieve can be configured and sieve must be built before managesieve can be configured/built. Now, the question arose what the long-term solution (in pkgsrc) should be. To my understanding, with dovecot 2.0, ManageSieve will no longer need to patch
2009 Feb 23
1
pkgsrc-ing sieve and managesieve
I'm trying to integrate both the new sieve implementation and managesieve into pkgsrc. Managesieve seems to need some dovecot libraries that dovecot doesn't install (lib-storage/libstorage.a, lib-auth/libauth.a, lib-imap/libimap.a, lib-index/libindex.a, lib-mail/libmail.a, lib-charset/libcharset.a, lib-dict/libdict.a and lib-charset/libcharset.a). There seems to be no provision in pkgsrc
2013 Jan 02
6
Does / Is anyone maintaining CVS for FreeBSD?
> There has been some discussion about removing CVS from the base system > now it is no longer used. No concensus was reached, so it's not going > away immediately (and would not be removed from 9.x or earlier branches > in any case). > CVS is (and will remain) available in ports (devel/cvs). > -- > Peter Jeremy Now CVS may be no longer used for FreeBSD servers, but
2023 May 22
2
got nut 2.8.1 but despite reinstall, shows 2.7.4
On 5/22/23 07:13, Greg Troxel wrote: > gene heskett <gheskett at shentel.net> writes: > >> Which file in the nut I pulled a month ago, should I start with to get >> the new version actually running? I still get - -V=2.7.4 > > It is likely that you have built new nut but old nut is still on your > system. I do a 'sudo make install' to write over the
2023 May 22
3
got nut 2.8.1 but despite reinstall, shows 2.7.4
gene heskett <gheskett at shentel.net> writes: > Which file in the nut I pulled a month ago, should I start with to get > the new version actually running? I still get - -V=2.7.4 It is likely that you have built new nut but old nut is still on your system. I do a 'sudo make install' to write over the distribution nut (on NetBSD/pkgsrc, surely not what you are using).
2023 Nov 09
2
2.8.1 build buglet: sockdebug.c
I am (belatedly) updating pkgsrc to 2.8.1 (+ bugfix). (FWIW, I think a 2.8.1.1 or 2.8.2 immediately with the fix is in order. >From a packaging viewpoint, the effort to update for a release is about 3 minutes plus time to adapt anythhing that has changed. So I'd much rather have releases more often.) In the pkgsrc build, nut finds tcp wrappers because they are part of the base system.
2007 Jan 04
1
Too many open files
I am running Dovecot 1.0rc15 on NetBSD 3.1 with only a few connections. It is built from pkgsrc-2006Q3, with mail/dovecot/ updated to HEAD. kqueue is a default build option - I haven't tried without yet. Mail directories/indexes are on a Linux 2.6.16.29 NFS file system, I have set these options and it performs well: mmap_disable=yes lock_method=fcntl FYI. rc7 had very high CPU use with the
2009 Feb 10
1
Calculating variables
Dear fellows: This is the problem: I have 5 variables A, B, C, D and E with a range from 1 to 100 with 0.1 steps. Depending on the different values these have, the results of the formula change: alitemp <- ((Abase/llmcc$Clase)*PClase)+(((1/llmcc $Categoria)*Abase)*PCategoria)+((Abase*llmcc$Phi)*PPhi)+((Abase*llmcc $Rf)*PRf) So, alitemp (a 283 element series) changes if any of the P**
2004 Feb 22
0
dovecot-nightly/NetBSD - Fwd: CVS commit: wip/dovecot-nightly
hello everybody, i just commited a pkgsrc for dovecot nightly cvs-snapshots to the pkgsrc-wip repository for NetBSD - this will hopefully go into base pkgsrc, soon. please see http://pkgsrc-wip.sourceforge.net/ on how to obtain pkgsrc-wip. ----- Forwarded message from Tom Hensel <tomhensel at users.sourceforge.net> ----- Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2004 11:18:52 -0800 From: Tom Hensel
2004 Oct 20
0
Home drives not being mounted. Samba 3.0.7 vs W2k TS
At a number of sites we are using Windows 2000 Server SP4 (APPSERVER) as a Terminal Server and a PDC. All user areas are stored on a NetBSD 1.6.2 server with Samba 3.0.7 using security = domain and a named password server. We've joined the domain from the Samba box (domain DOMAINNAME). In general everything works fine, but when a number of clients log on at around the same time (say 25 users
2005 Jan 06
1
Administrator->root mapping not working on 3.0.10 (3.0.7 fine)
We are using samba 3 on NetBSD with security=domain authenticating against Windows 2003. We have a username map of "root = administrator". In all previous versions of samba tested (2.2.x and 3.0.x), this means when we log on as administrator, we have root access and see the root share. With 3.0.10, we are continually prompted for a password. Log from 3.0.7 below: [2005/01/06 14:25:58,
2017 May 22
1
dovecot: auth-worker: Fatal: master: service(auth-worker): child XXXXX killed with signal 11
Trying to track down a dovecot issue .... The error message is: dovecot: auth-worker: Fatal: master: service(auth-worker): child XXXXX killed with signal 11 (core not dumped - set service auth-worker { drop_priv_before_exec=yes }) The setup is dovecot 2.2.29.1 with passwd and mysql auth db's and a very basic config. both authentications work ... the symptom is that after a connection
2023 May 22
1
got nut 2.8.1 but despite reinstall, shows 2.7.4
>>gene heskett <gheskett at shentel.net> writes: >>>Which file in the nut I pulled a month ago, should I start with to get >>>the new version actually running? I still get - -V=2.7.4 >On 5/22/23 07:13, Greg Troxel wrote: >>It is likely that you have built new nut but old nut is still on your >>system. I do a 'sudo make install' to write over
2023 May 22
2
got nut 2.8.1 but despite reinstall, shows 2.7.4
On Mon, 2023-05-22 at 15:54:51 +0200, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > > > gene heskett <gheskett at shentel.net> writes: > > > > Which file in the nut I pulled a month ago, should I start with to get > > > > the new version actually running? I still get - -V=2.7.4 > > > On 5/22/23 07:13, Greg Troxel wrote: > > > It is likely that you have
2023 Oct 02
1
release?
I stuck in a comment in an issue, but I think we're overdue, picking 6 months as arbitrary. I just created a snapshot privately. It passes make check on netbsd 9 amd64. I am updating pkgsrc-wip, which involves adjusting a lot of packages that I believe have been merged (yay!). I wonder if anybody thinks that git master has regressions from 2.8.0 right now. I ask this partly about