similar to: problems with flac?

As far as I can tell I've found a serious bug in the command line flac encoder :( I have created many hundreds of flac files and I was very annoyed to discover that the XMMS flac plug-in had intolerably long seek times, but since that had been mentioned on this list a bunch of times without anyone actually investigating, I thought I had better actually find the BUG which causes this. 1. I

Here you are: soa2ii at thor /mnt/files/music/Slime/Alle gegen Alle $ metaflac --list 02\ St?rtebecker.flac METADATA block #0 type: 0 (STREAMINFO) is last: false length: 34 minimum blocksize: 4608 samples maximum blocksize: 4608 samples minimum framesize: 14 bytes maximum framesize: 15637 bytes sample_rate: 44100 Hz channels: 2 bits-per-sample: 16 total samples: 5857656

So, let's provide some information then :-) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- soa2ii at thor /mnt/files/music/Slime/Alle gegen Alle $ flac -aF 02\ St?rtebecker.flac flac 1.2.1, Copyright (C) 2000,2001,2002,2003,2004,2005,2006,2007 Josh Coalson flac comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY. This is free software, and you are welcome

Hi I have downloaded a FLAC file somewhere and when trying to decode it to WAV it gives the error message: ERROR, MD5 signature mismatch So my question is now: are FLAC files that give the error message above still decodable to WAV (and how can you do this, because flac.exe doesn't want to decode the file), even if there is a MD5 signature mismatch, or is this not possible at all? thx

Are you sure it's not your compiler? That's the first thing I would check. I know that RedHat is famous for including broken pre-releases of GCC in their distributions since 7.0. I'd try recompiling with GCC 3 or GCC 2.95 (available as "kgcc"). -- Asheesh. On Sat, 16 Mar 2002, Nick Lamb wrote: > As far as I can tell I've found a serious bug in the command line

When I was trying to find yesterday's xmms-plugin bug, i have noticed that seeking in stream without seek-table isn't very good. With attached patch it is much better. -- Miroslav Lichvar -------------- next part -------------- --- src/libFLAC/seekable_stream_decoder.c.orig 2003-02-26 19:41:51.000000000 +0100 +++ src/libFLAC/seekable_stream_decoder.c 2003-07-09 23:49:35.000000000 +0200

Ok, the patch from 2003 about improving seeking still didn't make it to CVS, so here is another try. I made some benchmarking with the test_seeking utility from flac sources to show how bad the current seeking is, especially without seektable. Track used for the experiment had about 50 minutes. In the following table is average number of seeks and number of decoded frames required for one

Josh Coalson <xflac@yahoo.com> wrote: > --- Scott F <graue@oceanbase.org> wrote: > > > If I use flac to encode with the --replay-gain > > option, I get a warning about the --no-padding > > option... > > > > "NOTE: --replay-gain may leave a small PADDING block even with > > --no-padding" > > > > ...even though I'm

On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 06:31:21PM -0800, Josh Coalson wrote: > yes, a mere 2 years later it is checked in! > > speed improvement for me is roughly 17% testing flac files on > linux-i386. Thanks! In case you would like to check another old patch, I have attached updated patch for seekable stream decoder, originally posted on 09/07/2003. -- Miroslav Lichvar -------------- next

On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 11:13:25AM -0800, Josh Coalson wrote: > my apologies for not doing this before Miroslav... I will definitely > integrate it this time. Thanks. Sending latest version of the patch. Now it can seek in files that have large id3 tag (or any random data) at the end and it won't loop on streams with shuffled frames. -- Miroslav Lichvar -------------- next part

Ok, here is a patch waiting for new CVS :). It works fine for me, but please check it before commiting... -- Miroslav Lichvar -------------- next part -------------- --- src/libFLAC/bitbuffer.c.orig 2003-01-30 17:36:01.000000000 +0100 +++ src/libFLAC/bitbuffer.c 2003-01-30 21:53:18.000000000 +0100 @@ -51,6 +51,25 @@ */ static const unsigned FLAC__BITBUFFER_DEFAULT_CAPACITY = ((65536 - 64) *

If I use flac to encode with the --replay-gain option, I get a warning about the --no-padding option... "NOTE: --replay-gain may leave a small PADDING block even with --no-padding" ...even though I'm not using --no-padding. And the file does end up with a small padding block, so changing tags is slow. I'd fixed this bug in my own copy of flac 1.1.4, but forgot to submit the

Hi all, As people may have seen there's a pre-release here: http://downloads.xiph.org/releases/flac/beta/ Specifically: flac-1.3.1pre1.tar.xz : The source code flac-1.3.1pre1-win.zip : Windows 32 and 64 bit binaries Please test. I'm particularly interested in hearing about the windows binaries which were cross compiled from Linux to Windows. Unfortunately there is a bug

Hello, I work at SmarctJog.com, we have here some patches on IceCast for performance and reliability, these are mostly client/connection/source cleanups (a slave merge is underway, and some more good stuff (c)), but we'd like this to be merged in before the list gets any longer. Please find attached a list of our patches with a short desc: This one is actually not from us/me, it was found

Erik, My working view has this as the last commit: commit 19e3918d4e35f4ab99e7fcc58c169025c576dd16 Author: David Schleef <ds at schleef.org> Date:?? Thu Aug 25 18:40:29 2011 -0700 ??? Fix md5 structure clearing in previous commit Using this, test_metaflac.sh runs cleanly with my cuesheet.c change. I set up another view using HEAD at git.xiph.org, and in this other view

I mean that the first statement [Subset streams must use one of 192/576/1152/2304/4608/256/512/1024/2048/4096 (and 8192/16384 if the sample rate is >48kHz).] published on https://www.xiph.org/flac/documentation_tools_flac.html#flac_options_blocksize page IS NOT EQUAL to second statement [The blocksize bits in the frame header must be 0001-1110. The blocksize must be <=16384; if the sample

Hi everyone, I ve been using R for months and find it really practical and straight forward. However (the inevitable however), I am finding it very slow for one of my operations: it s basically an itertation over i and j in a pretty big table (4* 4608). It takes 30 minutes!!!! Thanks Ps:if it can help here is the source: median1<-matrix(nrow=4608,ncol=1)

Erik, I'll resync and have another look. Earl ________________________________ From: Erik de Castro Lopo <mle+la at mega-nerd.com> To: flac-dev at xiph.org Cc: Earl Chew <earl_chew at yahoo.com> Sent: Wednesday, February 1, 2012 10:30:21 PM Subject: Re: [flac-dev] Fix cuesheet.c to allow metaflac_test.sh to run to completion Earl Chew wrote: > When reading the INDEX

Any progress? > I agree. Please keep up informed. >> FLAC__format_blocksize_is_subset() was introduced by commit #8ab0138 >> (https://gitorious.org/flac/flac/commit/8ab013837d379d3d1fa84eac5420faec41852fd7) >> over 5 years ago and available in the latest stable release 1.3.0. >> >> It would be nice if the official FLAC documentation used common >> adopted

Hi everyone, I was fiddling with FLAC executable on Linux and also making FLAC files with foobar2000 under WINE. I was using the same exact options for both linux native executable and flac.exe through foobar2000. But I have noticed something: The FLAC files themselves created from flac.exe and flac(ELF) are not bit identical. They differ in something (Not audio data). Looking at this, I used a