similar to: FLAC joins Xiph

On Mon, 10 Jan 2005, Ralph Giles wrote: > As such it's an incompatible change, for which you should also > zero the 'age' field. So 1.1.1-beta1 should have been 2:0:0, > not 2:0:1. [...] > Yes, I agree. The numbering is all about coexisting installs of the > various versions. Ok. I need to know what to do about this... is 1.1.2 with fixed sonames just around the

i'm trying to build ices0.4 and vorbis-tools 1.0.1 with flac 1.1.1. Neither seems happy, hence the crossposting (sorry). ICES0.4 --- ices refuses to see the libFLAC library, even if i specify --with-flac=/usr/local/lib (or even just --with-flac=/usr/local/, as the configure script seems to look in the lib and include subdirectories of the specified path?). i get a configure error:

i'm trying to build ices0.4 and vorbis-tools 1.0.1 with flac 1.1.1. Neither seems happy, hence the crossposting (sorry). ICES0.4 --- ices refuses to see the libFLAC library, even if i specify --with-flac=/usr/local/lib (or even just --with-flac=/usr/local/, as the configure script seems to look in the lib and include subdirectories of the specified path?). i get a configure error:

/usr/bin/ld: bad -rpath option collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[4]: *** [libFLAC.la] Error 1 --- flac-1.1.2/src/libFLAC/Makefile.in.orig 2005-02-04 21:23:37.000000000 -0500 +++ flac-1.1.2/src/libFLAC/Makefile.in 2006-04-30 20:30:00.000000000 -0400 @@ -399,7 +399,7 @@ rm -f "$${dir}/so_locations"; \ done libFLAC.la: $(libFLAC_la_OBJECTS)

Note : I'm subscribed to the list. Please don't CC replies to me. Hi all, I am trying to compiler current CV head on a PowerPC G3 Debain system. Debian test has automake 1.9 which is a little more stringent about errors than 1.8. The following patch has the following fixes. 0) Remove AC_CANNONIAL_HOST because it has already been invoked earlier 1) Make sure

5.7 32bit server system (headless coloc server), long running, long time stable. I need the flac utils... [root at freescruz ~]# rpm -qa |grep flac (nothing installed) [root at freescruz ~]# yum install flac-devel Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, priorities Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile * base: mirror.5ninesolutions.com * extras: mirror.grikare.com * rpmforge: apt.sw.be *

That is the question I put before you all tonight :) (Short background, Xiph is the corp behind Vorbis and Ogg, among other things; see http://xiph.org/about.html . I think Emmett is here now so correct any of this if it's wrong.) I've been talking a little with Emmett Plant and Monty about this. If it were to happen, it would mean the following: 1. FLAC would benefit from the

Hi, And thanks for flac. There's a minor problem when compiling flac: libtool warns about mixing up shared and static libraries. Typical messages are: *** Warning: Linking the shared library libxmms-flac.la against the *** static library ../../src/plugin_common/libplugin_common.a is not portable! *** Warning: Linking the shared library libxmms-flac.la against the *** static library

I'm kind of swamped today so I'll answer what I can get away with until tonight: --- Joshua Haberman <joshua@haberman.com> wrote: > The most interesting questions to me are ones you didn't address: > > 1. Will Ogg FLAC become the default manifestation of the FLAC codec? > If not, why not? What does Ogg not offer that makes it worth having > two different file

On Sun, 09 Jan 2005, Ralph Giles wrote: > On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 12:22:18AM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > liboggflac FROM THE 1.0.4 RELEASE has version-info 0:1:0 > liboggflac FROM THE 1.1.1 RELEASE has version-info 2:1:1 Well, the packages we are having trouble here are: flac 1.1.0 (let me check... libOggFLAC version-info 1:2:0) debian package: liboggflac1 (matches

On Fri, Nov 08, 2002 at 07:12:35PM -0800, Josh Coalson wrote: > Yeah, it's useful, so now there is a > FLAC__seekable_stream_decoder_get_decode_position() and > FLAC__file_decoder_get_decode_position(). I haven't documented > them yet but you can see an example in > src/metaflac/operations_shorthand_seektable.c where I use it > during seektable creation. Ok, here is

OK, I'm coming to this a little late (been sick) but I'll try to answer all in one mail: On Sat, Jan 08, 2005 at 08:31:47PM -0800, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > > liboggflac1 did not change the soname (better check this, it > might require a > > soname change, check the seekable ogg-flac support stuff). > > CCing upstream on this. Josh, did 1.1.1 change interfaces in

Not sure if this is the right place to post this... I have attached a patch for the build system which lets FLAC build on IRIX and Cygwin. -------------- next part -------------- ? Makefile ? aclocal.m4 ? autom4te.cache ? config.guess ? config.log ? config.status ? config.sub ? configure ? depcomp ? install-sh ? irix.patch ? libtool ? libtool-disable-static ? ltmain.sh ? missing ? mkinstalldirs ?

On Thursday 04 October 2007 04:27:47 you wrote: > Sir, you need to provide more information. What kind of errors? What > is not working? What exactly are you trying to do? What compiler are > you using? H IV0, we are using a lot of different cross-compiler (mainly based on GCC 3.4.x) When I tried to cross-compile FLAC for non-i386 platforms (such as ARM), I use use

--- Joshua Haberman <joshua@haberman.com> wrote: > * Josh Coalson (xflac@yahoo.com) wrote: > > I'm kind of swamped today so I'll answer what I can get > > away with until tonight: > > > > --- Joshua Haberman <joshua@haberman.com> wrote: > > > The most interesting questions to me are ones you didn't address: > > > > > >

I think the basic problem is that configure can't find any C++ compiler on your system, which is required to build some of the libraries. It's kind of hard to imagine that Mandrake would supply gcc but not g++; maybe something else is wrong. Anyway, if you absolutely do not want any of the C++ stuff, you can just remove the following directories from SUBDIRS in src/Makefile libFLAC++

On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 09:37:18PM -0800, Josh Coalson wrote: > as far as I can piece together, the last releases went like: > > FLAC release libOggFLAC went to > ------------- ------------------------------------------ > 1.1.0 1:2:0 from 1:1:0 (code changes only I think) > 1.1.1-beta1 2:0:1 from 1:2:0 (some i'faces added, some changed) > 1.1.1

On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 12:22:18AM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > Well, if something built against 1.0.4 can (even in corner cases) > malfunction with 1.1.1, then yes, it must be 2:1:0. This holds true to > the soname of the C++ libs too if changes on the underlying C libraries are > somehow exported through the C++ ones. Ok. One more time. liboggflac FROM THE 1.0.4

Matt Zimmerman <mdz@debian.org> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 08:11:13PM +0100, Steve Lhomme wrote: > > > Well, I think going GPL would be too much, only GPL softwares could use > > the library. > > This is a common misconception, but entirely untrue. There are many > free software licenses, including the BSD-style licenses, which are > compatible with the

As of today FLAC has officially joined the Xiph project (Xiph is behind other codecs such as Vorbis and Theora). http://xiph.org/ogg/flac.html From a user's perspective, the only change will be better integration with Ogg tools. Native FLAC will continue to exist as before, the FLAC format is not changing, the command- line tools and plugins will continue to work the same way, etc.