similar to: Query on image link file mode?

Essentially, at this point my head is about to explode. I have been able to update the most recent samba-nds.schema from the LDAP CVS at samba.org. And I can add posixAccount users with the LDAPTools. But I cannot add anyone as a sambaAccount (./smbldap-useradd -a "username"). Each time, it adds the posixAccount portion to eDirectory, and then failes the sambaAccount add portion. Is

FLAC solution for MSVS contains two projects: flac_mac and flac_ren. They are intended to work together with Monkey's Audio GUI frontend ( http://www.monkeysaudio.com/images/screenshot.png ) as explained here: http://wayback.archive.org/web/20060428142919/http://flac.sourceforge.net/documentation.html#monkey Version 4.01b2 (February 17, 2006) still have out-of-box support for WavPack. Version

I thought some here may find this interesting... There has been discussion in Monkey's Audio forum about creating a new open source format for lossless audio compression with the intent of creating a *standard* for lossless compression, similar to what Xiph is trying to do with Ogg Vorbis. Some have even been tossing around the idea of trying to work in conjunction with Xiph on this, and a

Hi list users, Is there a comparison somewhere of the efficiency of decoding flac files, with respect to some benchmark related to cpu processing? As compared to, say, ape files? I ask because I have recently switched my entire archive from ape to flac. I have an old 400 mhz laptop in my office running xubuntu, which I run into a receiver. Works great. Since switching to flac, I notice the

Hello, I?m new to R and am using it with RStudio to learn the language. I?m doing so as I have quite a lot of traffic data I would like to explore. My problem is that all the data is located on a number of PDFs. Can someone point me to info on gathering data from other sources? I?ve been to the R FAQ and didn?t see anything and would appreciate your thoughts. I am quite sure now that often,

Okay, I know absolutely jack about jack, and it will probably show when I ask my first questions. I have managed to download and install Wine, as well as run winecfg. However, I'm not sure just *how much* configuration needs to be done. The User's Manual made it seem as though a lot of it was optional, though I'm not at all sure, and some of it is quite daunting to somone who just

I was looking around in the documentation of other lossless decoders and noticed that Monkey's Audio supports a normalize feature, the ability to play back different music types and keep them in the same volume range. This seems like a nice option to have when playing an archived cd collection. My question is whether this could just be done at the plugin level or if it would be better to

Which plugins do you mean? I thought I remember Winamp, for instance, being able to do word-length reduction on the fly. The only place I can find this feature is in the Monkey's Audio codec plugin, though. Anyway, great news Josh! Thanks for making 24-bit audio support in FLAC a priority. :) MW On Tue, 11 Jun 2002, Josh Coalson wrote: > --- Mike Wren <mikew@etree.org>

> 1. The performance gain from this on real programs is small. I will suggest > that the total performance gain from optimisations that rely on exploiting > undefined behaviour - let's call them monkey's paw optimisations for short - > is practically never more than a few percent, and often less than one > percent. > > 2. For most programs, having the program work is

Monkey's Audio lossless compressor (currently win32 only, free but not open-source except decoder) author is thinking to implement a kind of audiophile-quality lossy compression which would filter "noise bits" that are hard to encode lossless but which are (or should be) inaudible and thus improve lossless compression (avg. 300-450kbps). I think that implementing something like this

Hello, Does anyone know how to configure the mime type for ogg on Apache (on a FreeBSD box)? I added application/x-ogg to the mime.types file in Apache, but Nutscrape6.2 and Mozilla 0.9.5 just show the file in txt format, IE5x on the other hand kindly asks me what to do with the file (open it or download it). I also added the mime-type in Nutscrape62 and Mozilla and added Winamp as helper app

Hi Scott, I have never done this myself but I read something recently on the r-help distribution that was related. I just did a quick search and found a few hits that might work for you. 1. https://medium.com/@CharlesBordet/how-to-extract-and-clean-data-from-pdf-files-in-r-da11964e252e 2. http://bxhorn.com/2016/extract-data-tables-from-pdf-files-in-r/ 3.

I think I would use pdftk to extract the form data. All subsequent manipulation in R. HTH Ulrik Eric Berger <ericjberger at gmail.com> schrieb am Mi., 24. Jan. 2018, 08:11: > Hi Scott, > I have never done this myself but I read something recently on the > r-help distribution that was related. > I just did a quick search and found a few hits that might work for you. > >

Hi Just wondering if anyone could help with regarding the following. I have a number of Linux servers within an NT domain and I can access all of them. But I have a linux server behind our (raptor) firewall - samba has been configured on it and appears to be running. What I want to know is how do I access it from the NT domain. I know I will have to make some changes on the firewall - but how

On 14-03-13 20:02, Declan Kelly wrote: > The next official release of the FLAC command line should really have > a "-9" option for absolute maxed-out big-memory CPU-burning compression. No. If you want such things, try TAK, OptimFROG, Monkey's Audio or even LA, you'll lose hardware compatibility anyway and they do much better than FLAC will with a -9 option. FLAC 1.0

Hi Everyone, A website refresh is long overdue, for a couple reasons: 1. The webpage hasn't changed substantially for years, but the project obviously has :) 2. The current web site is very cluttered. 3. The current site does not convey what LLVM is to new people very well. 4. The current site does not support "subprojects" at all. As such, I put together a prototype for a new

On Tue, 2004-01-20 at 23:44, Josh Coalson wrote: > Miroslav did some experiments with searching for optimum blocksize. > from what I remember it made at best a couple percent difference. > there was a thread about it here a while back. > Did his changes make it in? I can think of a coupla ways to approach this and I'd like to hear about what he tried. A couple of % doesnt seem

> But having programs miscompiled so that they silently fail, in many cases > starting only years after the code in question was written, is very much not > okay. That's far worse than documented portability problems. When given a certain spin... Tim.

On 1 July 2015 at 11:34, Russell Wallace <russell.wallace at gmail.com> wrote: > Why do you say spin? You're dismissing all use-cases other than this very narrow one I'd (with my own spin) characterise as "Do What I Mean, I Can't Be Bothered To Get My Code Right". Fair enough, you're arguing in favour of a point; but it's not one I agree with. Tim.

We already perform optimizations only when the compiler can prove they won’t break the program. The only difference between that and what you suggest is in the definition of “won’t break the program”. We define it as “won’t break the program with respect to the semantics implied by the C/C++ spec”. You want to redefine it, by specifying a new abstract machine, which is more conservative than