similar to: Re: Shorewall-devel -- confirmation of subscription -- request 915994

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 6000 matches similar to: "Re: Shorewall-devel -- confirmation of subscription -- request 915994"

2004 Aug 06
1
YP submission / cURL issue. (icecast 2.0.1 / gentoo)
Karl Heyes wrote: > The libs that Brendan mentioned are loaded after the start of the > program, in fact they are referenced when the host name is looked up. > The loading is done within libc so apps like icecast don't know it's > being done. ldd does not show these libs, but the mechanism is the same > as used by plugins of various apps. Would building statically help? Is
2004 Jan 07
2
three-interface.xml
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 three-interface.xml is done. I am completing the cleanups and "look and feel" changes. It will be checked in shortly. - -- "If at first you don''t succeed, destroy all evidence that you tried." Paul <snafu@forkbomb.dhs.org> BLOG: http://forkbomb.dhs.org/bs/ GPG Key: http://forkbomb.dhs.org/bs/snafu.asc -----BEGIN
2004 Aug 06
0
Icecast server YP Woes... take 2
D. Willock wrote: > What I saw of the output of tcpdump didn't show any mention of the yp > url. The communications seem to run only between the client and the > server and nowhere else. This is the dump I got: If I may jump in here since my previous thread/problem went unsolved ;-) I've got nothing for a dump either. 'snort -dev dst dir.xiph.org' gives nothing on
2003 Dec 10
40
DocBook XML conversion progress
Everyone, Progress was slow today. I started out well, but then I ran into Documentation.htm. Progress slowed considerably, as I analyzed the document structure. I''m up to /etc/shorewall/hosts Configuration. I hope to finish Documentation.xml by tomorrow evening. Converted documents: 6to4.xml CorpNetwork.xml FAQ.xml Please post feedback, if you see any problems with the converted
2002 Nov 04
0
Re: Shorewall-devel -- confirmation of subscription -- request 168447
On Mon, 04 Nov 2002 01:27:25 -0800 shorewall-devel-request@shorewall.net wrote: > Shorewall-devel -- confirmation of subscription -- request 168447 > > We have received a request from dummy-kddi.kddnet.de for subscription > of your email address, <s.veckes@de.kddi.com>, to the > shorewall-devel@shorewall.net mailing list. To confirm the request, > please send a message
2002 Aug 29
0
Shorewall-users -- confirmation of subscription -- request 533537
Shorewall-users -- confirmation of subscription -- request 533537 We have received a request from 207.34.24.8 for subscription of your email address, <jgofton@danicar.net>, to the shorewall-users@shorewall.net mailing list. To confirm the request, please send a message to shorewall-users-request@shorewall.net, and either: - maintain the subject line as is (the reply''s additional
2003 Dec 26
13
Remaining .htm? files
Of the remaining HTML files in the Shorewall-docs/ project, the only ones that I want to convert to HTML are: standalone.htm two-interface.htm three-interface.htm Paul -- while file(s) are you working on? -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool Shoreline, \ http://shorewall.net Washington USA \ teastep@shorewall.net
2003 Jan 29
5
A suggestion
Tom, I was upgrading a remote firewall, when upon restart, shorewall found a rule with a wrong zone and decided to not continue and stop itself. The problem now, is I cannot access that firewall over ssh anymore. One suggestion would be to instead of "shorewall stop" to have a basic emergency rule with only ACCEPT:info all all tcp ssh rule instead with DROP all policy. Shorewall could
2004 Aug 06
1
Icecast server YP Woes... take 2
oddsock wrote: >can you verfiy that you can connect to dir.xiph.org from the machine >running icecast ? i.e. wget http://dir.xiph.org/cgi-bin/yp-cgi On my end I got communications of sorts via wget, but that's about it. >anything else special network-wise in your setup ? As far as my network setup it too is a standard setup, 1 Dlink NAT/firewall, cable modem and . As for the
2004 Aug 06
2
YP submission / cURL issue. (icecast 2.0.1 / gentoo)
Hi: I'dve thought that there'd be no need for the libs in the chroot, as icecast starts up first, then chroots. Even if this isn't strictly the case, wouldn't icecast crash if it couldn't pull in the relevant code? This doesn't seem to be happening, at least in this case. Geoff. --- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ icecast project homepage:
2004 Aug 06
2
YP Server Woes
I'm having a problem getting my stream published on dir.xiph.org using icecast2/ices2-beta4 The output in my log is: [snip] DBUG geturl/curl_print_header_result SID -> () DBUG geturl/curl_print_header_result Message -> () DBUG geturl/curl_print_header_result Touch Freq -> (0) DBUG geturl/curl_print_header_result Response -> (0) EROR yp/yp_submit_url Got a NAK from yp_add(Unknown)
2004 Aug 06
2
Icecast server YP Woes... take 2
At 01:42 PM 4/12/2004, you wrote: >D. Willock wrote: > >>What I saw of the output of tcpdump didn't show any mention of the yp >>url. The communications seem to run only between the client and the >>server and nowhere else. This is the dump I got: > >If I may jump in here since my previous thread/problem went unsolved ;-) > >I've got nothing for a dump
2004 Aug 06
2
Icecast server YP Woes... take 2
can you provide a dump of the conversation between your icecast server and the YP ? Use something like tcpdump or ethereal...In the dump, look for the URL call to yp-cgi and post what is being sent... oddsock <p>What I saw of the output of tcpdump didn't show any mention of the yp url. The communications seem to run only between the client and the server and nowhere else. This is the
2020 Jun 21
0
Blog article about the state of CentOS
On Sun, 21 Jun 2020 at 15:10, Peter <peter at pajamian.dhs.org> wrote: > > On 22/06/20 7:03 am, John Pierce wrote: > > On Sun, Jun 21, 2020 at 2:01 AM Simon Matter via CentOS <centos at centos.org> > > wrote: > > > > exactly, that was my point. I remember 8.0 was very delayed by how much > > harder and different the build process was. > >
2002 Feb 08
0
Re: Ext3-users -- confirmation of subscription -- request 905448
On Thu, 7 Feb 2002 ext3-users-request@redhat.com wrote: > Ext3-users -- confirmation of subscription -- request 905448 > > We have received a request from 66.88.179.82 for subscription of your > email address, <mhaque@haque.net>, to the ext3-users@redhat.com > mailing list. To confirm the request, please send a message to > ext3-users-request@redhat.com, and either: >
2003 Jan 07
0
Re: SYSLINUX -- confirmation of subscription -- request 972136
On Mon, 06 Jan 2003 18:19:58 -0800 syslinux-request at zytor.com wrote: > SYSLINUX -- confirmation of subscription -- request 972136 > > We have received a request from 219.165.129.31 for subscription of > your email address, <buxus at tmail.plala.or.jp>, to the > syslinux at zytor.com mailing list. To confirm the request, please send > a message to syslinux-request at
2005 May 23
0
Re: wine-users -- confirmation of subscription -- request 385395
Dnia poniedzia?ek, 23 maja 2005 14:22, wine-users-request@winehq.org napisa?: > wine-users -- confirmation of subscription -- request 385395 > > We have received a request from 62.89.75.143 for subscription > of your email address, <Marcin.Kasperski@softax.com.pl>, to > the wine-users@winehq.org mailing list. To confirm the > request, please send a message to >
2002 Jul 30
0
RE: samba -- confirmation of subscription -- request 871338
-----Original Message----- From: samba-request@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org] Sent: 30 July 2002 10:57 To: drooke@lucent.com Subject: samba -- confirmation of subscription -- request 871338 samba -- confirmation of subscription -- request 871338 We have received a request from 192.11.224.103 for subscription of your email address, <drooke@lucent.com>, to the
2013 Sep 19
0
iax packet loss again.
I saw this thread which is very similar to my issue, though I cannot solve mine with iptables. http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/2013-September/280429.html Using asterisk 11.5, IAX does not seem to be able to receive any packets. My IP tables looks like this: root at dlaptop:/home/darryl# iptables -L Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT) target prot opt source
2004 Jan 09
32
Ideas for Shorewall 2.0
I''m beginning to think again about what will be different in 2.0. Here are some thoughts. a) User-defined actions will be emphasized. - A library of actions will be available with names such as: AcceptSSH AcceptDNS DropWindows (drops all SMB noise) DropBroadcasts (Silently drop all Broadcast traffic) ... The possibilities are nearly endless but should