similar to: Project Announcement : New Media Container Format 'matroska'

Monty wrote: > On Sat, Dec 07, 2002 at 10:29:29PM +0100, ChristianHJW wrote: > > >Please allow me to announce the creation of a new open source Media > >Container Format, named 'matroska' > > > >Project page is here http://sf.net/projects/matroska ; homepage is > >http://matroska.sourceforge.net , HTML should be online soon. > > Another redundant

Monty wrote: > On Sat, Dec 07, 2002 at 10:29:29PM +0100, ChristianHJW wrote: > > >Please allow me to announce the creation of a new open source Media > >Container Format, named 'matroska' > > > >Project page is here http://sf.net/projects/matroska ; homepage is > >http://matroska.sourceforge.net , HTML should be online soon. > > Another redundant

On Sat, Dec 07, 2002 at 10:29:29PM +0100, ChristianHJW wrote: > > Please allow me to announce the creation of a new open source Media > Container Format, named 'matroska' > > Project page is here http://sf.net/projects/matroska ; homepage is > http://matroska.sourceforge.net , HTML should be online soon. Another redundant project? "ten BSD programmers are sealed

On Sat, Dec 07, 2002 at 10:29:29PM +0100, ChristianHJW wrote: > > Please allow me to announce the creation of a new open source Media > Container Format, named 'matroska' > > Project page is here http://sf.net/projects/matroska ; homepage is > http://matroska.sourceforge.net , HTML should be online soon. Another redundant project? "ten BSD programmers are sealed

On Thu, 25 Nov 2004 10:25:43 -0800, Ralph Giles <giles@xiph.org> wrote: > I think it would be better to say which formats are technically > superiour for streaming (ogg and mpeg program streams) or > editing (quicktime/matroska) or dead/obsolete (AVI, MCF?), If video is recorded and saved in ogg/theora container/format, could it be converted into matroska/theora container/format

http://www.matroska.org/ I just found out about this and I think it looks like a great idea. I figured some on this list would be interested. Also, speaking now without having reviewed matroska in detail, nor being involved in Ogg/Vorbis: Perhaps it would be a viable alternative for the Ogg format for Theora if nothing else. I read about the .ogg format a while back, and while I have no

hi everyone ! since nobody answered the question in the extension-thread, i would like to ask again in a new thread: why does xiph and the theora-team not promote the matroska-format? do you just prefer ogg because its "home-made" or are there technical advantages over mkv? thanks! greetings hannes hauswedell

D Richard Felker III wrote: > On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 07:26:21PM +0000, Mark Hills wrote: >>>I tried to bind the 'OggS' 4CC to the vorbis codec in mov.c, but it >>>doesn't seem to like it... anyway, in QuickTime AFAIK the vorbis track >>>is embeded in an Ogg container... so we have those alternatives: >>The example you give from Cinerlerra is the

Hi all Currently Theora video in Matroska is not supported by Mplayer. To enable the support Michael Niedermayer has made the following proposal sometime back: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.video.mplayer.nut.devel/214 Appreciate if Theora developers could comment on that. Best Regards Unga ____________________________________________________________________________________ Get your

Josh Coalson wrote: > --- engdev <engdev@ozemail.com.au> wrote: > >>Hi, >> >>Has there been any progress on the ACM for FLAC >>that was being looked at by Steve Lhomme? > > > Haven't heard anything here about it for a long time. Sorry, I sent my reply to engdev privately (because there's no good reply to). In short I haven't worked on

Thanks Christian. Now I can play my FLAC files with WiMP. I uninstalled the illuminable package and then installed the Matroska. The result was the opposite that I got for the illuminable: the illuminable package registered the types but WiMP couldn't find the codecs, the Matroska didn't register the types but it did make the codecs available. This is much preferable of course

Hello, I'm looking into storing FLAC audio in Matroska and I have a few questions. 1. Can I use libflac to extract the compressed frames? Or will I need to write up a simple file parser? 2. What is required to decode the frames? From the docs I understand that you need the FRAME and you may need the METADATA_BLOCK. Thanks, Jory Stone jcsston@toughguy.net Matroska, the new,

Hi everyone, I face a problem trying to encode a mkv file into theora using directshow filters I have a mkv file containing only video encoded in YUY2. I use the DirectShowNet Lib V2.1 ( <http://sourceforge.net/projects/directshownet/files/> http://sourceforge.net/projects/directshownet/files/) I use the matroska splitter directshow filter v1.0.2.9 (

Hello, (Sorry, this is a bit off-topic.) I was reading some stuff and came across the NUT container data format. (The NUT website is down... so I could not read up on it. But perhaps someone here knows about it.) Like Ogg and Matroska, NUT also seem to be a Free multimedia container data format. But how does it compare to Ogg (and even Matroska)? Why was it created when Ogg (and Matroska)

First, Thank you for your answers. I using the following code to try simply decode a flac file and write the decoded data raw PCM file. The resulting file is just noise and pops, so is the decoded data in a different format than PCM? struct flacData { FILE *inputFile; FILE *outputFile; char *filename; }; FLAC__StreamDecoderReadStatus flac_DecoderReadCallback(const FLAC__StreamDecoder

On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 11:21 AM, Chris Double <chris.double at double.co.nz> wrote: > Excerpts from Frank Barchard's message of Wed Feb 03 13:11:15 +1300 2010: >> >> Yes, and its good to learn from DVD's too. DVD is a subpart of MPEG: http://www.mpucoder.com/DVD/vobov.html, http://dvd.sourceforge.net/dvdinfo/dvdmpeg.html . Uses the same functionality for tracks, iiuc.

On 2010-08-27, Ralph Giles wrote: >> My question to you, What advantages has ogg vs matroska. > > They're both free containers, and there isn't a significant > performance difference, so either one works from a free media > perspective. [...] Personally I would add the following points/bullets: * Ogg has a lesser semantic burden, so that e.g. embedded

Hallo all, euphoria with cheese, the project i working on, i needed to make decision about codecs and containers we use. I'm clearly not expert in this. After the euphoria about vp8/webm going slowly to the end, i see advantages what theora has against vp8. Seems like theora perform better on LoEnd hardware. Even x264 with good optimisation work not really good on slow Athom. My question to

Hello, You guys might want to join this discussion. (And maybe some others too.) On the WhatWG mailing list, there's been a fury of e-mails about adding a <video> element to HTML5. They're talking about codecs and containers now. It might be helpful to have your representatives there. And help shape things. See ya ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Dave Singer

Both MPEG-4 File Format (mp4) and Matroska (mkv) have an interesting format for lyrics and subtitles. Since these container formats can contain multiple contain streams, lyrics or subtitles are just another "stream" interleaved with the rest of the data. They are synchronized by having timestamps like any other stream. The payload is just text data. If you don't care about