Displaying 20 results from an estimated 500 matches similar to: "autoheader failing?"
2004 Sep 10
0
autoheader failing?
--- Matt Zimmerman <mdz@debian.org> wrote:
> With these versions:
>
> ii autoconf 2.54-2 automatic configure script builder
> ii automake1.6 1.6.3-2 A tool for generating GNU
> Standards-complian
>
> I am unable to build the autoconfiscations. autoheader gives:
>
> autoheader2.50: error: AC_CONFIG_HEADERS not found in configure.in
>
2004 Sep 10
2
autoheader failing?
(btw, after mangling all the autoconfiscations to use config.h, autoheader
works for me...)
On Mon, Oct 07, 2002 at 11:16:13PM -0700, Josh Coalson wrote:
> > (btw, I do think it would be a very good idea to start using
> > AC_CONFIG_HEADERS instead of passing so many of -D's on the compiler
> > command line)
>
> Yeah, it's a good idea... can you take care of this
2001 Oct 24
1
Borken dirname on Solaris 2.5.1
Discovered this post an upgrade to 2.9.9p2, Solaris 2.5.1 dirname is
busted for paths like "/usr", returning "" rather than "/".
Index: acconfig.h
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/upstream/openssh/acconfig.h,v
retrieving revision 1.1.1.3
diff -u -r1.1.1.3 acconfig.h
--- acconfig.h 2001/10/23 15:18:33 1.1.1.3
+++
2002 Jun 25
2
Linux 2.2 + borken mmap() round 1
The following is just a simple 'if ANON|SHARE is broken, disable
compression'. We don't have time for fancy stuff until we have time for
long term testing.
I have one friend of mine testing this. Can I get a few other people to
test. This is against --current, but maybe work against 3.3p1. Unsure.
BTW.. those on NeXT platform (if you have autoreconf) should also test
this. this
2004 Sep 10
0
autoheader failing?
--- Matt Zimmerman <mdz@debian.org> wrote:
> (btw, after mangling all the autoconfiscations to use config.h,
> autoheader
> works for me...)
>
> On Mon, Oct 07, 2002 at 11:16:13PM -0700, Josh Coalson wrote:
>
> > > (btw, I do think it would be a very good idea to start using
> > > AC_CONFIG_HEADERS instead of passing so many of -D's on the
>
2002 Nov 05
2
2.5.6 release
On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 08:37:00AM -0800, Martin Pool wrote:
> On 10 Oct 2002, "Green, Paul" <Paul.Green@stratus.com> wrote:
> > No new CVS messages have appeared on the rsync-cvs archives since August
> > 30th. This seems rather odd-- perhaps a daemon stopped working? If there
> > has truly been no activity since that date, I apologize for
> >
2004 Aug 06
3
libshout compile problems
No, it's not his version of autoconf or automake.
I had the same errors even with the latest versions available for my
debian distribution.
I only could help myself by using one of my precompiled binaries from a
previous cvs snapshot.
I haven't tried it with the current snapshot but I also don't know if
there had been any update lately.
Michael Smith wrote:
>>all ok until
2005 Feb 24
1
[PATCH] Drop SETGROUPS_NOOP
Hi,
the SETGROUPS_NOOP define is used only for Cygwin. But it's also
combined with the HAVE_SETGROUPS test in bsd-misc.c. So, since
setgroups() exists and is functional in Cygwin, this is actually a
noop in the more general sense. The below patch drops that entirely.
Corinna
Index: acconfig.h
===================================================================
RCS file:
2002 Jul 04
1
[PATCH]: Remove HAVE_CYGWIN in favor of NO_IPPORT_RESERVED_CONCEPT
Hi,
I've sent that patch once already but it seems more or less forgotten
in the tumultuous days of the latest vulnerability.
It adds a new define NO_IPPORT_RESERVED_CONCEPT which can be defined
on platforms not supporting the concept of "privileged" ports only
accessible by privileged users but which allow everyone to use these
ports.
This patch removes some Cygwin dependencies
2002 Jun 24
1
remove --with-rsh
is this ok (complete, correct)?
Index: INSTALL
===================================================================
RCS file: /var/cvs/openssh/INSTALL,v
retrieving revision 1.53
diff -u -r1.53 INSTALL
--- INSTALL 13 May 2002 05:22:21 -0000 1.53
+++ INSTALL 24 Jun 2002 00:50:20 -0000
@@ -105,11 +105,6 @@
There are a few other options to the configure script:
---with-rsh=PATH allows you to
2002 Mar 12
2
sys/queue.h
removes HAVE_BOGUS_SYS_QUEUE_H and always use our queue.h. ok?
Index: acconfig.h
===================================================================
RCS file: /var/cvs/openssh/acconfig.h,v
retrieving revision 1.122
diff -u -r1.122 acconfig.h
--- acconfig.h 26 Feb 2002 16:40:49 -0000 1.122
+++ acconfig.h 12 Mar 2002 02:11:39 -0000
@@ -14,7 +14,6 @@
/* SCO workaround */
#undef
2001 Jun 03
1
OPIE support patch
I just cobbled up a little patch to add support for OPIE to
OpenSSH. Currently untested, but feedback is welcome.
Wichert.
--
_________________________________________________________________
/ Nothing is fool-proof to a sufficiently talented fool \
| wichert at cistron.nl http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ |
| 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0 2805 3CB8 9250
2000 Mar 07
2
patch for openssh-1.2.2p1
Hi,
openssh-1.2.2p1 seems to have 2 problems on ipv6 (and
ipv4 mapped addresses).
1. "BREAKIN ATTEMPT" warnings from ipv4 node
2. X forwarding
The following patche fixes them.
Thanks.
diff -ru openssh-1.2.2p1/canohost.c openssh-1.2.2p1-20000308/canohost.c
--- openssh-1.2.2p1/canohost.c Fri Jan 14 13:45:48 2000
+++ openssh-1.2.2p1-20000308/canohost.c Wed Mar 8 00:25:18 2000
@@
2002 May 28
5
Problems with UsePrivilegeSeparation (was: port fwd as user != root?
I just upgraded to OpenSSH3.2.3p1 as it seemed that
UsePrivilegeSeparation yes
might help with my problem (connections forwarded
are owned by root instead of the user I logged in as
on the server), but instead, sshd barfs on receiving
a connection. Without UsePrivilegeSeparation
the server works fine.
# strace -o /tmp/sshd.str sshd -d
debug1: sshd version OpenSSH_3.2.3p1
debug1: private host
1999 Nov 19
1
[solaris 7 patch] resubmit and extended ...
Okay, everything as the first large one I sent today, with a few extra
mods. _PATH_MAILDIR is only used in sshd.c, that I can see, so moved the
#ifdef from config.h.in to there.
several files had __progname defined in the middle of the code, as well as
at the top of the code, so cleaned those out.
all the fixes for u_int32_t -> uint32_t and u_int16_t -> uint16_t, plus
added appropriate
2003 Sep 08
1
please test (HEADER.ad)
Could someone with HEADER.ad in arpa/nameser.h please test the
attached patch (against current) to see it it's detected.
None of my platforms have the ad member.
config.h will end up with "#define HAVE_HEADER_AD".
--
Tim Rice Multitalents (707) 887-1469
tim at multitalents.net
-------------- next part --------------
--- openssh/configure.ac.old 2003-09-08 06:33:33.000000000
2000 Aug 29
5
kernel oplocks
I am a little bit confused about the kernel support for oplocks.
man page of smb.conf:
----------------
For UNIXs that support kernel based oplocks (currently only IRIX but
hopefully also Linux and FreeBSD soon) this parameter allows the use
of them to be turned on or off.
This parameter defaults to "On" on systems that have the support, and
"off" on systems that don't.
2001 Oct 24
4
snapshot problems on Mac OS X
Here are some problems with the latest snapshot on Mac
OS X:
I am by no means an autoconf expert, but here is what
happens after a "autoreconf":
autoconf: Undefined macros:
configure.in:1291:AC_CHECK_MEMBERS([struct
stat.st_blksize])
configure.in:2168:AC_CONFIG_FILES([Makefile
openbsd-compat/Makefile scard/Makefile ssh_prng_cmds])
configure.in:26:AC_SYS_LARGEFILE
2003 Jan 25
1
Build failures: nanosleep on Solaris and AIX 4.2.x
Hi All.
The recent changes to scp caused build failures on Solaris and AIX 4.2
which showed up on the tinderbox[1]. I mentioned the first to djm in
email yesterday but I'm posting after finding the second, in case anyone
else has seen similar problems.
Solaris' nanosleep is in librt (or libposix4 in older versions) which
is not linked. Adding them to configure works fine, however ldd
2002 Mar 22
2
Trusted HP-UX 10.26
I haven't noticed any work on Trusted HP-UX 10.26 in the archives (then
again maybe I missed it). I have made changes to get sshd working on
trusted HP-UX, ssh already worked. I can supply a patch, but before I did I
was wondering if it is best to send the patch to this list, or file it as a
bug report? The patch is just around 6k, and includes changes to
configure.ac and acconfig.h, allong