similar to: FLAC 1.0.4 beta released

I uploaded the source tarball and binary releases for win32 and redhat 7. Solaris package should be ready tomorrow. See the news item for all the improvements from 1.0.3: http://flac.sourceforge.net/news.html#20020924 Developers, see the new Doxygen-based API docs: http://flac.sourceforge.net/api/index.html Thanks again to all the contributors and testers. Josh

I rethought it and it seemed like a bad idea to post a big file, so you can get it here: http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/flac/junk/flac-1.0-src-candidate.tar.bz2 Josh __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/

On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 11:11:24PM -0700, Josh Coalson wrote: > I have just finished uploading the source release for FLAC 1.0.4 beta > to Sourceforge; there are no binary releases. See the included > doc/html/news.html for the changes since 1.0.3; there are quite a few. > > http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/flac/flac-1.0.4_beta-src.tar.gz?download I just downloaded 1.0.4 beta,

--- Christian Weisgerber <naddy@mips.inka.de> wrote: > Josh Coalson <xflac@yahoo.com> wrote: > > > Basically what I want is configure.in determination of > > basic machine type (intel/compatible, alpha, ppc), then within > > that (say intel) the code will detect variants like MMX, SSE, > > and use the right routines. > > Please include a way to

On Thu, Jul 19, 2001 at 04:58:44PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > On Thu, Jul 19, 2001 at 10:38:14AM -0700, Josh Coalson wrote: > > > So, last chance to checkout from CVS and break it! > > Also, my libtool doesn't seem to recognize --tag=CC. What is its purpose? > > /bin/sh ../../../libtool --tag=CC --mode=compile \ > sh ../../../strip_fPIC.sh nasm -f

finished hooking up the altivec stuff so it works in ProjectBuilder. I ran a test, doing a 'flac -t' on 400MB of files compresses at level 5. the runtime dropped from from 180 sec to 105 sec! once I get the latest autotools on my ibook I'll try and get asm compilation to work that way. Josh --- Josh Coalson <xflac@yahoo.com> wrote: > OK, checked it all in (only minor

On Sat, Jul 21, 2001 at 04:06:14PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > Argh. Maybe libtool will have to get involved after all. I'll work on it > this afternoon. I think I give up. automake and libtool assume that the compiler will be able to assemble stuff, and compilers don't generally understand NASM input. I don't like the strip_fPIC bit, since just about anything that could

On Fri, Jul 20, 2001 at 03:01:54PM -0700, Josh Coalson wrote: > --- Matt Zimmerman <mdz@debian.org> wrote: > > > > automake will include ltmain.sh in the source distribution, so it > > should be > > used even if it isn't installed on the build system. In fact, it > > seems to > > always use the distributed version, and not the installed one

On Thu, Jul 19, 2001 at 05:05:46PM -0700, Josh Coalson wrote: > --- collver@linuxfreemail.com wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 19, 2001 at 04:58:44PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > > > On Thu, Jul 19, 2001 at 10:38:14AM -0700, Josh Coalson wrote: > > > > > > > So, last chance to checkout from CVS and break it! > > > > > > Also, my libtool

On Wednesday, February 5, 2003, at 10:47 PM, Josh Coalson wrote: > --- Matt Zimmerman <mdz@debian.org> wrote: > > good, very good. it may take me a little bit to get to it > since I'm starting a new job next week. > > Ben, can you inspect the patch and confirm that it covers > what you also suggested? The patch fixed the problem with your libs. However, when

--- Christian Weisgerber <naddy@mips.inka.de> wrote: > Josh Coalson <xflac@yahoo.com> wrote: > > > I have checked in all the latest into CVS and am going to start the > > test suite again. if all goes well I will probably release this as > > beta 10. > > What's the sequence of steps required to turn this into a buildable > distribution? >

Christian Weisgerber <naddy@mips.inka.de> wrote: > | # nasm build rule: > | %.lo: %.s Even with gmake, this really works only by accident. Automake generates a competing suffix rule, and gmake apparently gives the rule above a higher priority than the suffix rule (or that just happens to be the evaluation order). Matt, since you seem to understand automake, can you come up with

I have checked in what should be the code for 1.0. Unless I find some problems in the next two days (I'm doing one more exhaustive test on another 100 CDs) the only thing that will be changing is the new comparison table or maybe the configure stuff. So, last chance to checkout from CVS and break it! Josh P.S. Thanks to Andrey Astafiev, there's a Russian translation of the docs, which

I have just released a source distribution which is the candidate for the 1.0.3 release. At this time I would ask anyone who is willing to help test it to do the following: 1. download the tarball and unzip it: http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/flac/flac-1.0.3_beta-src.tar.gz?download 2. do ./configure && make && make check This will build all code and run all the tests.

On Fri, Jul 20, 2001 at 04:17:38PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > Maybe the easy way to get around all of this is to build a plain old .a archive > for the assembler stuff, instead of a libtool .la library. This may or may not > cause problems when linking the libFLAC shared library. I'll try it. It does work, but gives a warning: *** Warning: Linking the shared library

On Thu, Jul 19, 2001 at 02:56:11PM -0700, collver@linuxfreemail.com wrote: > On Thu, Jul 19, 2001 at 05:01:07PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > > Once I removed that, it also seems to hate the .nasm extension: > > > > /bin/sh ../../../libtool --mode=compile \ > > sh ../../../strip_fPIC.sh nasm -f elf -d OBJ_FORMAT_elf cpu_asm.nasm > > libtool: compile:

They are not needed since the section is defined in nasm.h. --- src/libFLAC/ia32/bitreader_asm.nasm | 4 ---- src/libFLAC/ia32/cpu_asm.nasm | 4 ---- src/libFLAC/ia32/fixed_asm.nasm | 4 ---- src/libFLAC/ia32/lpc_asm.nasm | 4 ---- src/libFLAC/ia32/stream_encoder_asm.nasm | 4 ---- 5 files changed, 20 deletions(-) diff --git

I just uploaded flac 1.0-1 to Debian unstable; it should appear in the archives tomorrow. In order to get things to work correctly with libtool 1.4, I had to apply the following patch: --- flac-1.0.orig/ltmain.sh +++ flac-1.0/ltmain.sh @@ -1862,6 +1862,7 @@ else # We cannot seem to hardcode it, guess

Damn, back to this thread: > I think I sent a bad patch for this one already, which used a _LIBS > variable. > There is no _LIBS variable. :-) So, the .la file should be specified > directly > in _LIBADD, with no linker flag syntax. libtool will figure it out. > > diff -u -r1.1.1.1 Makefile.am > --- Makefile.am 29 Jan 2001 18:13:29 -0000 1.1.1.1 > +++

On Fri, Jul 20, 2001 at 02:42:21PM -0700, Josh Coalson wrote: > --- Matt Zimmerman <mdz@debian.org> wrote: > > It does work, but gives a warning: > > > > *** Warning: Linking the shared library libFLAC.la against the *** static > > library ia32/libFLAC-asm.a is not portable! > > > > I think this is just because libtool can't determine whether the