similar to: Another Beta Patch

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1173 Bug ID: 1173 Summary: Documentation/error messages around NAT statements in "inet" tables incorrect Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: P5

Hi all, I was trying to test ROUTE specific code with a multi-isp serviced box. There is a bug somewhere, but I''m not able to understand what the real problem is: when I issue a "shorewall show capabilities" I get: Loading /usr/share/shorewall/functions... Processing /etc/shorewall/params ... Processing /etc/shorewall/shorewall.conf... Loading Modules... Shorewall has

Dear list members, Masquerading does''not work for me. This is a Mandrake Linux 10 system, but I use another kernel, that included in the original distribution (original: 2.6.3, now used 2.6.8 because of a lot of suck with OpenSwan with kernels prior 2.6.4). The problem seems to be similar or identical mentioned here:

On Thu, 2004-12-23 at 12:35, Markus F.X.J. Oberhumer wrote: > Yes, but "TARGET_HAS_JIT" seems to be unused, so what is this for ? projects/llvm-test/Makefile.programs:175:ifdef TARGET_HAS_JIT projects/llvm-test/Makefile.programs:182:endif#TARGET_HAS_JIT projects/llvm-test/LLVMSource/Makefile:22:ifdef TARGET_HAS_JIT projects/llvm-test/SingleSource/CustomChecked/Makefile:27:ifdef

I have a dsl modem and two static IP addresses: 66.17.65.22 and 66.17.65.161. I am using the standard configuration from the Shorewall Setup Guide for multiple IP addresses and modifications suggested by the Aliased Interfaces Guide. I want to set up a shorewall 2.08 router for my home (Fedora Core 2 / kernel 2.6.8-1.521). I want share an internet connection with some pc''son a local

Hello everybody, To make all clear; I am newbee in shorewall, but... I''ve tried to connect two computers by Mandrake Connection Sharing facility. (Mandrake 9.1). Briefly, the problem is that after all that auto-configuration activities the network is completely down, just because shorewall. The result of calling `shorewall debug start` by hand is available at the end of the

I am getting the following message when Shorewall stops can anybody shed any light on this message and where I should be looking? Thanks root@bobshost:~# shorewall stop Loading /usr/share/shorewall/functions... Processing /etc/shorewall/params ... Processing /etc/shorewall/shorewall.conf... Loading Modules... Stopping Shorewall...Processing /etc/shorewall/stop ... IP Forwarding Enabled

I have /bin/ash from rh8 installation and I have following error when I tried to change using ash instead of sh with shorewall-1.4.7: + eval options=$tap0_options + options= + list_search newnotsyn + local e=newnotsyn + [ 1 -gt 1 ] + return 1 + run_user_exit newnotsyn + find_file newnotsyn + [ -n -a -f /newnotsyn ] + echo /etc/shorewall/newnotsyn + local user_exit=/etc/shorewall/newnotsyn + [

On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 07:36:31PM +0100, Miroslav Lichvar wrote: > attached are patches that improve decoding speed a bit. The first > patch improves the bit scan macro used for decoding unary values, the > second one adds a GCC inline assembly for bswap and the third patch > replaces the read_rice_block function. The third patch has a bug causing reading past input buffer, attaching

Attached please find updated build and publish scripts. They set the ''ulink.target'' parameter appropriately when converting docbook->HTML. I have always hacked my xhtml/params.xsl file to set this parameter; these updated scripts make that abomination unnecessary. Paul/Mike: It might be a good idea to add a CVS project for these scripts. -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ Nothing is

Hi, I have a proxy/firewall, I want to dnat requests for 193.205.140.106 on port 443 towards 10.2.15.23 and requests for 193.205.140.106 on ports 4330 and 3389 towards 10.2.15.25, these rules must apply from internet, loc and fw (some client use a proxy on fw to reach these servers) I have tried with the following rules: DNAT net dmz:10.2.15.23 tcp 443 -

This is a minor release of Shorewall. WARNING: This release introduces incompatibilities with prior releases. See http://www.shorewall.net/upgrade_issues.htm. Changes are: a) There is now a new NONE policy specifiable in /etc/shorewall/policy. This policy will cause Shorewall to assume that there will never be any traffic between the source and destination zones. b) Shorewall no longer

Hi, attached are patches that improve decoding speed a bit. The first patch improves the bit scan macro used for decoding unary values, the second one adds a GCC inline assembly for bswap and the third patch replaces the read_rice_block function. In my testing it turned out to be even faster than the _ia32_bswap function. If the code produced by MSVC is faster as well, I'd suggest to remove

Let''s move this to the Shorewall Development list.... On Tuesday 10 February 2004 03:14 pm, xavier wrote: > here is a patch to allow this : > |ACCEPT<10/sec:20>:debug fw lan:$ntp_servers udp 123 - - - - ntp > > a problem with the patch is that now the logprefix is mandatory. > i''m trying to debug it, but i can''t find the flaw. Also, with

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I''m running systems with openswan and modified _updown script supporting shorewall dynamic hosts. Because on problems with cvs head version of openswan I found a error from shorewall dynamic hosts support. When host is already in zone shorewall aborts adding process with error. This is not good thing(tm). I found out that deleting host from

Hello again R help. This is a simple question perhaps(laughing as I type) with a simple answer. Is the multcomp package appropriate for using with a lme built under the nlme package. I know i can get it to work (i.e report p-values for a tukey test) but i am not unsure if this is appropriate for a linear mixed effects model. Below is the code i used lmm1 <- lme(asinh(density_recruit) ~

Hi, I installed the shorewall 1.3.8-2 debian package to my debian testing machine which serves as the gateway to the internet. Since I have two other machine connect to internet thru this gateway machine, I also downloaded the configuration guide for "basic two-interface firewall" and followed the instructions. When I try to start the shorewall I get the following message and can not

In order to see how llvm-gcc-4.2 svn performs in code generation compared to the upcoming gcc 4.4, I ran the Polyhedron 2005 benchmarks on a MacPro with the -ffast-math -funroll-loops -msse3 -O3 optimization flags for both compilers. The results are summarized below. Ave Run (secs) Ave Run (secs) llvm-gcc-4.2/ Benchmark llvm-gcc-4.2 svn gcc trunk gcc trunk

Hi, After manipulate my data I have ended up with 5 different data frames with different number of observations but the same number of variables (columns) An example, if I write str(object1), I see this, data.frame': 47 obs. of 3 variables: $ ORF : Factor w/ 245 levels "YAL038W","YAL054C",..: 10 19 38 39 44 45 50 51 59 60 ... $ mRNA : num 0.891 1.148 1.202