Displaying 20 results from an estimated 4000 matches similar to: "problem compiling with gcc 3?"
2004 Sep 10
3
AMD debugging test files available
On Fri, Aug 16, 2002 at 11:14:01AM -0700, Josh Coalson wrote:
> --- Josh Coalson <xflac@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >...
> > If anyone with a similar set up can read the comments in the
> > following bug reports and do some investigation it would really
> > help a lot. I would like to hear about setups that are working
> > as much as ones that aren't.
>
2004 Sep 10
7
Need AMD debugging help
To all who have an AMD + Windows based PC:
I have gotten a few similar bug reports about encoding
errors with FLAC. The common features are:
- Repeatedly encoding the same file with verify will have
verify errors some of the time (looks like aroung 50%) and
the verify errors will occur in different places each time.
- This is happening on AMD PCs running Windows. More reports
come from
2004 Sep 10
1
problem compiling with gcc 3?
Yes, the tests are pretty exhaustive. Actually if you have
the test_files/ directory checked out of CVS it will run
even more tests.
I reran all the tests again (asm optimizations on) on redhat
7.1 with gcc 2.96 and they all passed. They are also all
passing on Windows with MSVC and OS X with gcc 2.95.2.
Matt, there is a slight chance that your noise tests failed
because your run produced the
2004 Sep 10
2
Re: seeking problems
--- august <august@alien.mur.at> wrote:
>
>
> sorry to bother again,
>
> but I can narrow down my problem to certain parst of my flac file.
>
> for example, when I seek to 19*44100 samples or to 81*44100 samples,
> the
> seek callback runs off in an endless loop.
>
> there aren't any while loops in my code, so I don't think I am
> causing it.
2005 Sep 16
3
Rather serious flac problem
Okay.. I love flac but just had a rather serious failure that really
shakes my confidence. It resulted in the near loss of a master audio
recording. Fortunately, I have a backup. Though there may have been
other cases where I have lost original material because I have been
compressing a lot of originals and deleting them after doing a 'flac
-t' on them.
Basically, flac failed with a
2004 Sep 10
1
FLAC 1.0.5 beta1 released
make check > out 2> err
bzip2 out
bzip2 err
Oh, look, errors. Huh. Check the end of "out" for details.
-- Asheesh.
--
What the world *really* needs is a good Automatic Bicycle Sharpener.
On Fri, 3 Jan 2003, Asheesh Laroia wrote:
> I have an Athlon Thunderbird 1Ghz sitting running all alone in my dorm
> room while I'm at home for six weeks. I figure I'll run
2004 Sep 10
1
--until decodes rest of file?
On Fri, 7 Nov 2003 11:42:05 -0800 (PST) Josh Coalson <xflac@yahoo.com> wrote:
> sorry about the delay on this one...
>
> do you have a sample flac file that you can host that exhibits
> the problem?
Ha. The flac files used in the examples below were of entire audio CDs;
due to my use of "time" to demostrate the problem I need a fairly large
file.
I can simulate the
2007 Jul 25
1
Bug: flac --replay-gain thinks that I used --no-padding
Josh Coalson <xflac@yahoo.com> wrote:
> --- Scott F <graue@oceanbase.org> wrote:
>
> > If I use flac to encode with the --replay-gain
> > option, I get a warning about the --no-padding
> > option...
> >
> > "NOTE: --replay-gain may leave a small PADDING block even with
> > --no-padding"
> >
> > ...even though I'm
2005 Feb 11
1
FreeBSD 4.x problem resolved
Bryan Levin reported a problem of the FreeBSD flac port dumping
core on FreeBSD 4.x:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1099004&group_id=13478&atid=113478
It turns out that the port enabled SSE support, but FreeBSD 4.x
does not support SSE by default. (FreeBSD 5.x and later do.) I
have added a small patch to the port to check at runtime whether
the system
2007 Dec 28
1
Tags in files with Unicode BOM
Is there any way for flac or metaflac to support input from files with
Unicode Byte Order Marks (BOM)?
In command:
metaflac --remove-all-tags --set-tag-from-file="CUESHEET=CDImage.cue"
--set-tag-from-file="LOGFILE=CDImage.log" CDImage.flac
If "CDImage.cue" contains Unicode characters, most text editors append BOM
at the 1st line of this file.
And metaflac does not
2004 Sep 10
1
[Flac-users] Winamp 3 plugin
Hi all,
I've installed the Winamp 2 plugin and it seems to work fine. However
I wish to install the Winamp 3 plugin on another machine but can't find it
anywhere. Where is it?
Thanks
Ashton
__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
New DSL Internet Access from SBC & Yahoo!
http://sbc.yahoo.com
2004 Sep 10
1
[Flac-users] trouble with flac -d --until=n
Hi,
I've noticed some strange behavior with flac 1.1 - first on NetBSD 1.6
and then on Solaris 9.
When I decode a flac with the --until=n option, the file decodes
normally, but pauses for a long time on the "99% complete" stage
while consuming a lot of CPU.
I took a closer look at what's happening and it appears like flac
is reading the entire flac file past the
2014 Nov 25
19
flac-1.3.1pre1
Hi all,
As people may have seen there's a pre-release here:
http://downloads.xiph.org/releases/flac/beta/
Specifically:
flac-1.3.1pre1.tar.xz : The source code
flac-1.3.1pre1-win.zip : Windows 32 and 64 bit binaries
Please test.
I'm particularly interested in hearing about the windows binaries
which were cross compiled from Linux to Windows. Unfortunately
there is a bug
2004 Sep 10
2
deafening silence
if your talking id3v1, something along the lines of (in bash):
for f in *.flac ; do tail -c 128 $f > tag && flac-0.8 -d $f
${f%*.flac}.wav && flac-0.9 -V ${f%*.flac}.wav $f && cat tag >> $f ;
done
should work. of course, test it before you set it loose on your
whole collection.
if you're on windows, my condolences... no wait, just get cygwin :)
Josh
---
2007 Sep 14
4
Testing 24-bit full-scale deflection streams fails
Hi list,
I am trying to compile and install flac 1.2. I $ ./configure(d) and $
make(d) without any errors or warnings. However I get the following error
when $ make check(ing):
> Testing 24-bit full-scale deflection streams...
> fsd24-01 (--channels=1 --bps=24 -0 -l 16 --lax -m -e -p): encode...ERROR
> during encode of fsd24-01
> FAIL: ./test_streams.sh
> ===================
2005 Feb 01
3
FLAC 1.1.2-beta: attn package maintainers
The FLAC 1.1.2 release candidate is now available at
http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/flac/flac-1.1.2-beta.tar.gz?download
Only the source tarball is available. I am putting out the beta
first so that package maintainers and others can smoke test the
build/install/check process before the official one goes out,
since we've had problems before. Everyone that can, please
download and try:
2014 Nov 25
2
flac-1.3.1pre1
Op 25-11-14 om 23:39 schreef Jan Stary:
> Is there a reason the test scripts are calling bash?
The change from sh to bash was made a little more than a year
ago. The mailing list thread accompanying this change can be
found here:
http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/flac-dev/2013-September/004374.html
2004 Sep 10
1
[Flac-users] osx 1.0.4
On 10/18/2002 7:29 PM, Josh Coalson wrote:
> --- Wagner One <wagner@wagnerone.com> wrote:
>> On 10/18/2002 12:50 PM, Josh Coalson wrote:
>>
>>>> i configured and built 1.0.4 in osx 10.2. seemed to build fine, but each
>>>> time i attemped to use the newly compiled flac binary I received this error
>>>>
>>>> "bus
2004 Sep 10
1
[Flac-users] FLAC 1.0.4 build issue
Hi,
I gave up on 1.0.4 on my osx machine for the time being, but needed it on a
linux machine this morning. Grabbed 1.0.4 and it seemed to build ok, but
doesn't pass make check.
Sorry if this is redudant information. I've seen a few posts recently and
can't tell if it is or not.
flac-1.0.3 on the same machine builds, checks and runs fine.
thanks,
mike
ERROR: iterator claims
2004 Sep 10
5
1.0 source candidate
I rethought it and it seemed like a bad idea to post
a big file, so you can get it here:
http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/flac/junk/flac-1.0-src-candidate.tar.bz2
Josh
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/