similar to: VLAN Fix

10/30/2003 - Shorewall 1.4.8 RC1 Given the small number of new features and the relatively few lines of code that were changed, there will be no Beta for 1.4.8. I am particularly interested in people testing: a) The interface to ''ftwall'' b) Handling of <zone>_frwd chains (those of you who had problems with 1.4.7b or that have reported extra rules in these chains).

Currently at: http://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/shorewall-1.4.8 ftp://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/shorewall-1.4.8 Coming soon to a mirror near you. This is a minor release of Shorewall. Problems Corrected since version 1.4.7: 1) Tuomo Soini has supplied a correction to a problem that occurs using some versions of ''ash''. The symptom is that "shorewall start"

This is a bugfix roll up of the following: 1) Tuomo Soini has supplied a correction to a problem that occurs using some versions of ''ash''. The symptom is that "shorewall start" fails with: local: --limit: bad variable name iptables v1.2.8: Couldn''t load match `-j'':/lib/iptables/libipt_-j.so: cannot open shared object file: No such

If I'm not mistaken, "bundle" is really only useful as a concept for distribution and installation. You distribute and install a bundle, but load the individual packages when you want to use them. Once you install the bundle, you won't see the name of the bundle in the list of installed packages, but you see the constituent packages, and those are what you load when you want to

Folks I have come across an issue with gc() hogging the processor according to Rprof. Platform is Ubuntu 20.04 all up to date R version 4.3.1 libraries: survival, MASS, gtools and openxlsx. With default gc.auto options, the profiler notes the garbage collector as self.pct 99.39%. So I have tried switching it off using options(gc.auto=Inf) in the R session before running my program using

The first Beta Version is available at: http://www.shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/Beta ftp://ftp.shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/Beta New features include: 1) "shorewall refresh" now reloads the traffic shaping rules (tcrules and tcstart). 2) "shorewall debug [re]start" now turns off debugging after an error occurs. This places the point of the failure near the end of the

The versions of the CVS ''firewall'' script in both the /Shorewall and /STABLE threads corrects the problem described in the attached post. These scripts should be installed on the 1.4.7 Beta and 1.4.6c releases respectively. -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ Shorewall - iptables made easy Shoreline, \ http://shorewall.net Washington USA \ teastep@shorewall.net -------------- next

An Investor ALERT is being issued starting right N0W. Keep your eyes glued on PSUD!! Explosive pick for our members! PETROSUN DRILLING (PSUD) Current Price: 1.13 Don't get caught in the dust, start watchin today because this company has been known to release major news at any time which could bring the st0ck up!! Current News PetroSun Named Title Sponsor of The Independence Bowl

Tuomo Soini wrote: > You don''t happen to read shorewall-devel mailinglist ? I read it -- I just didn''t know what to make of your post and it arrived while I was on vacation. What exactly are you trying to accomplish that Shorewall isn''t doing for you now? e.g. /etc/shorewall/zones rw Roadwarriors Road Warriors /etc/shorewall/interfraces rw ipsec+

Hi! I''m trying to develop a web chat (like the facebook one, but much simpler) that works inside Rails 3, and so I''m inquiring about the methods used for this scope. I had some success applying this guide http://www.web2media.net/laktek/2010/02/16/building-real-time-web-apps-with-rails3/ , so now I am able to send messages form the server to the client. Anyway, I read about

I will be resurrecting the ''check'' command in 1.4.0 Beta 3 (which may be named RC1). a) For checking the ''rules'' file, it will use the same code that processes that file for the [re]start command with the exception that ''iptables'' won''t be run. While this will make the code easier to maintain, it probably won''t do any

FYI... ---------- Forwarded Message ---------- Subject: RE: [Shorewall-users] 2.6 kernel ipsec and shorewall Date: Thursday 23 September 2004 07:44 From: "Jonathan Schneider" <jon@clearconcepts.ca> To: "''Tom Eastep''" <teastep@shorewall.net> I must have been up too late working on this, looking at it the next day I noticed I completely forgot

Hi I have 2nic firewall . I had to open some ranges of udp and tcp ports . I faced a problem that although all the ports are open Some functionality was not working . Any body used shorewall with H323 Voip traffic DNATed . Any help is appretiated . Thanks ----- Original Message ----- From: <shorewall-users-request@lists.shorewall.net> To: <shorewall-users@lists.shorewall.net> Sent:

FYI This bug will prevent ''shorewall restore'' from working if you have "!<single IP address>" in the ORIGINAL DEST column. -Tom ---------- Forwarded Message ---------- Subject: [PATCH] Another iptables-save buglet Date: Wednesday 14 September 2005 15:09 From: Tom Eastep <teastep@shorewall.net> To: netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org The conntrack

I''m thinking of starting on a Ruby website that uses WebSockets, and perhaps working some on a server for it beforehand. Is good support for asynchronous connections something I could work on adding to the Rails core? Is it feasible? Desired? As I understand it, Rails plugins like Juggernaut [1] aren''t going to optimally support async, since they can''t re-architecture

the data file has such structure: 1992 6245 49 . . 20 1 0 0 8.739536 0 . . . . . . . . "alabama" . 0 . 1993 7677 58 . . 15 1 0 0

And Andrew -- PLEASE don''t reply off-list. I''m not a private help desk... -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ Shorewall - iptables made easy Shoreline, \ http://shorewall.net Washington USA \ teastep@shorewall.net ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2003 19:01:34 -0700 (Pacific Daylight Time) From: Tom Eastep <teastep@shorewall.net> To: andrew

http://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/2.2-Beta/shorewall-2.2.0-Beta2 ftp://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/2.2-Beta/shorewall-2.2.0-Beta2 Problems Corrected: 1. The "shorewall check" command results in the (harmless) error message: /usr/share/shorewall/firewall: line 2753: check_dupliate_zones: command not found 2. The

Hiya, My two cents here .. I use a locked down Linux Sendmail relay (use sendmail null-client feature on any spare old server or PC) in my DMZ to relay Mail to the exchange server in my local zone. Its sort of the moat you have to cross over to get at the castle walls and the hot oil dumped on your head approach. Francesca C. Smith Lady Linux Internet Services 1801 Bolton Street # 1 Baltimore,

I got a message from the organizer, for the first time the video feed of the Golden Penguin Bowl is available.... So if you never saw me making a complete fool of myself live, now's your chance to see it second hand :-) :-). John Mark Walker wrote : > Hey ho... so the Golden Penguin Bowl video is now up, and you can get to > it from http://www.linuxworldblog.com/ Jeremy.