Displaying 20 results from an estimated 3000 matches similar to: "1.0 source candidate"
2004 Sep 10
5
1.0 candidate checked in
On Sat, Jul 21, 2001 at 04:06:14PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> Argh. Maybe libtool will have to get involved after all. I'll work on it
> this afternoon.
I think I give up. automake and libtool assume that the compiler will be able
to assemble stuff, and compilers don't generally understand NASM input. I
don't like the strip_fPIC bit, since just about anything that could
2004 Sep 10
0
1.0 source candidate
On Fri, Jul 20, 2001 at 05:15:21PM -0700, Josh Coalson wrote:
> I rethought it and it seemed like a bad idea to post
> a big file, so you can get it here:
>
> http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/flac/junk/flac-1.0-src-candidate.tar.bz2
With the attached patch, a complete "make distcheck" should work, including the
self-tests. It adds missing directories to some
2004 Sep 10
2
1.0 candidate checked in
On Thu, Jul 19, 2001 at 05:05:46PM -0700, Josh Coalson wrote:
> --- collver@linuxfreemail.com wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 19, 2001 at 04:58:44PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jul 19, 2001 at 10:38:14AM -0700, Josh Coalson wrote:
> > >
> > > > So, last chance to checkout from CVS and break it!
> > >
> > > Also, my libtool
2004 Sep 10
2
1.0 candidate checked in
On Sun, Jul 22, 2001 at 12:28:52AM -0700, Josh Coalson wrote:
> 2. Applied Matt's last cleanup patch of 8 files. I did not apply the patch
> to src/test_unit/main.c since it looks wrong. main.c is supposed to include
> the local bitbuffer.h, not src/libFLAC/private/bitbuffer.h; I think the
> current version is correct.
Ah, I missed that there was a local bitbuffer.h. In that
2006 Jul 27
1
[PATCH] nasm cleanup
Hi folks,
here's a patch which cleans up the nasm call from Makefiles.
Abusing libtool and then having to drop in some additional
wrapper script to rewrite the commandline again is rather stupid.
cu
--
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Enrico Weigelt == metux IT service - http://www.metux.de/
2004 Sep 10
2
Re: beta 10 candidate checked in
--- Christian Weisgerber <naddy@mips.inka.de> wrote:
> Josh Coalson <xflac@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > I have checked in all the latest into CVS and am going to start the
> > test suite again. if all goes well I will probably release this as
> > beta 10.
>
> What's the sequence of steps required to turn this into a buildable
> distribution?
>
2012 Dec 03
4
[PATCH 1/5] Remove old GNU-stack sections from nasm files.
They are not needed since the section is defined in nasm.h.
---
src/libFLAC/ia32/bitreader_asm.nasm | 4 ----
src/libFLAC/ia32/cpu_asm.nasm | 4 ----
src/libFLAC/ia32/fixed_asm.nasm | 4 ----
src/libFLAC/ia32/lpc_asm.nasm | 4 ----
src/libFLAC/ia32/stream_encoder_asm.nasm | 4 ----
5 files changed, 20 deletions(-)
diff --git
2004 Sep 10
2
1.0 candidate checked in
> OK, that worked.
>
> I checked in your patch to make a static libFLAC-asm.a and
> I moved @XMMS_LIBS@ to the end of ...LIBADD. Matt and Ben,
> can you try the latest CVS to see if it works for you now?
It doesn't work for me. Looks like libtool decided not to link
libFLAC-asm.a into libFLAC.
Here's the output:
Making all in src
gmake[1]: Entering directory
2004 Sep 10
2
1.0 candidate checked in
On Fri, Jul 20, 2001 at 04:17:38PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> Maybe the easy way to get around all of this is to build a plain old .a archive
> for the assembler stuff, instead of a libtool .la library. This may or may not
> cause problems when linking the libFLAC shared library. I'll try it.
It does work, but gives a warning:
*** Warning: Linking the shared library
2004 Sep 10
2
1.0 candidate
I just checked out the 1.0 candidate and ran autogen.sh
autoconf errored out so autogen.sh did not work and I had to run automake
manually. the autoconf error message was:
configure.in:145: CFLAGS="$CFLAGS -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops -finline-functions -Winline -DFLAC__INLINE=__inline__"
anyhow I ran configure and I went into src/libFLAC/ia32 and ran gmake
I get
2004 Sep 10
1
[Flac-users] flac validation?
hello gang
i'm about to start encoding lots of data (i.e. a 160 GB HDD full of wav
files), and i'm having last minute hesitations about using a fairly new
encoding program (flac).
how much validation has been done on flac? in other words, apart from "it
works", how can i trust that i'm not going to lose my data? i have seen at
least one bug in the bug db where flac
2017 Jan 06
8
[PATCH 0/5] Allow multiple targets to be disabled
Hi,
This patchet allows a few targets to be disabled when unrequired.
The rational is coming from VLC's contrib buildsystem, so far we use make -C to select only some subparts of the available targets.
It would be easier and cleaner to use autoconf to do so IMHO.
There's an additional patch which fixes the build when building for WinRT/UWP platform, upstreamed from VLC.
We have a couple
2004 Sep 10
2
object format detection
Last night I checked in code to enable changing the object
file format passed to nasm. But I don't have many examples
to draw from so if anyone could submit patches against
configure.in for any of nasm's supported formats I'll put
them in. Right now the relevant snippet just looks like:
AC_CANONICAL_HOST
case "$host" in
*) OBJ_FORMAT=elf ;;
esac
Any patterns for
2017 Jan 15
4
Updated CFLAGS patches and make test compilation conditional
Hi Erik,
I've found a middleground for the problem of setting default CFLAGS. I've gone back
to setting them if {C,CXX,CPP,LD}FLAGS are unset at the onset of the configure script
(i.e., the user hasn't specified anything) and then proceed to set them to the defaults
as before. This has been suggested before:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/autoconf/2006-04/msg00022.html
In
2016 Jan 31
3
test_streams dependencies
test_streams currently depends on grabbag and (on Windows) on win_utf8_io libs.
It depends on win_utf8_io only because it uses flac_fopen() function.
It will become to depend on libFLAC when all file functions will be moved
from win_utf8_io to libFLAC. Not a big problem, but it is possible to avoid
this dependency by replacing flac_fopen() with fopen().
test_streams doesn't open/create
2005 Feb 04
1
[PATCH] FLAC 1.1.2-beta on Cygwin
Without the following, nasm builds elf objects on cygwin and the
build fails. (Though my cygwin packages are not very recent;
would anyone else like to test this out?)
Chris
*** configure.in.orig Fri Feb 4 06:58:06 2005
--- configure.in Fri Feb 4 06:59:18 2005
***************
*** 52,57 ****
--- 52,58 ----
AM_CONDITIONAL(FLaC__CPU_SPARC, test x$cpu_sparc = xtrue)
case
2004 Sep 10
5
FLAC 1.0.4 beta released
All,
I have just finished uploading the source release for FLAC 1.0.4 beta
to Sourceforge; there are no binary releases. See the included
doc/html/news.html for the changes since 1.0.3; there are quite a few.
http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/flac/flac-1.0.4_beta-src.tar.gz?download
Please beat up on this as much as possible in the next week or two and
try and turn up bugs. Here's a
2004 Sep 10
6
libFLAC docs
> > For those of you using CVS, I have added a libFLAC section to the
> > documentation page. I'm not sure how detailed to make it but I
> > think it's a good start. Let me know if there's anything else
> > you'd like to have in there.
> >
> >
>
2016 Jan 31
2
test_streams dependencies
Brian Willoughby <brianw at audiobanshee.com> ?????(?) ? ????? ?????? Sun, 31 Jan 2016 22:26:40 +0300:
> My assumption is that the code was written to call flac_fopen() so that it is portable to every operating system, even those without fopen(). If you replace flac_fopen() with fopen(), then the tests won't compile on systems that don't have fopen().
I REALLY doubt it. Even if
2004 Sep 10
2
-lm ordering
In order to compile flac-1.0 with Compaq C on FreeBSD/alpha, I
needed to move -lm to the end of the libraries, otherwise ccc would
complain about unresolved symbols. Patches below.
The result is nothing less than stunning. On my 21164A/500 box,
"ccc -fast" code is almost twice as fast as "gcc -O -mcpu=ev56",
1:11 vs. 2:03 for encoding a test track with default parameters.