similar to: new --sector-align option

is anyone using the --sector-align option of flac, or flac frontend, or shntool? that option actually complicates the flac code a lot and I would like to take it out if possible. it really belongs in a higher level encoding or burning tool. if you are using it, let me know which tool you use it with and if it's with wave, aiff, or raw files.

Dat Head wrote: > I use it all the time for wav to flac conversions for CDR burning (doesn't > everybody?!) or maybe i use it with shntool before encoding to flac, I'm pretty sure (don't have the code and couldn't read it if I had it) that shntool's "fix" module doesn't use flac's --sector-align option but has its own routines. For one thing,

thanks, will take a look. Josh --- Dave Chapman <dave@dchapman.com> wrote: > Hi, > > A user at the www.thetradersden.org website reported a difference > when > fixing "sector boundary errors" in CD-quality WAV files with shntool > and > flac. As as result of investigating this, I think I've found a bug > in > the zero-ising of the buffer used to

Hi, A user at the www.thetradersden.org website reported a difference when fixing "sector boundary errors" in CD-quality WAV files with shntool and flac. As as result of investigating this, I think I've found a bug in the zero-ising of the buffer used to zero-pad the last file when encoding with the --sector-align option. My test consisted of the creation of four

Hi all, I'm seeing this failure on my PPC G4 box running TOT with llvm-gcc 4.2. Is anyone else seeing this? I'm sure it's related to the byval stuff that's recently gone into LLVM. I'm attaching the output of this command: $ llvm-gcc -emit-llvm -O3 -S -o - -emit-llvm /Users/wendling/llvm/ llvm.src/test/CFrontend/2008-01-25-ByValReadNone.c As you can see in it, there

Hi ALL, Here is a weird problem comfusing me for a long time. i''v installed xen 4.0.1 with linux kernel 3.1.0-rc9+ Everything works fine except i cannot ping to the gateway in a PVM domU. i''v installed bridge-utils and brctl show like this bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces eth0 8000.00219b480d56 no

Hi r-users,   I would like to extract the data that match.  Attached is my data: I'm interested in matchind the value in column 'intg' with value in column 'rand_no' > cbind(z=z,intg=dd,rand_no = rr)             z  intg rand_no    [1,]  0.00 0.000   0.001    [2,]  0.01 0.000   0.002    [3,]  0.02 0.000   0.002    [4,]  0.03 0.000   0.003    [5,]  0.04 0.000   0.003    [6,] 

Hi! > [ANNOUNCE] Btrfs v0.9 > [...] > * Stripe size parameter to mkfs.btrfs (-s size_in_bytes). Extents will > be aligned to the stripe size for performance. > [...] http://fixunix.com/kernel/258991-[announce]-btrfs-v0-9-a.html versus > -s, --sectorsize size > Specify the sectorsize, the minimum block allocation. (man mkfs.btrfs with btrfs-tools

Hi, In my analysis of impacts of insecticide-treated bednets on malaria, I look at the relationship between malaria incidence and mosquito behaviors. The condensed data set is copied here. Ordinary regression (lm) shows that Incidence was negatively related to Mortality. This makes sense because the latter reflected the strength of killing mosquitoes by insecticide-treated nets. Since the

Does anyone have an address for a maintainer, or know what's going on? cheers Ben Bolker ben at bolker-lap2:~$ ping wiki.r-project.org PING econum.umh.ac.be (193.190.194.5) 56(84) bytes of data. ^C --- econum.umh.ac.be ping statistics --- 8 packets transmitted, 0 received, 100% packet loss, time 6999ms ben at bolker-lap2:~$ traceroute wiki.r-project.org traceroute to

Hi Everyone, I'm continuing to run into trouble with polyfit. I'm using the fitting function of the form; fit <- lm(y ~ poly(x,degree,raw=TRUE)) and I have found that in some cases a polynomial of certain degree can't be fit, the coefficient won't be calculated, because of a singularity. If I use orthogonal polynomials I can fit a polynomial of any degree, but I don't get

-- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones virt-top is 'top' for virtual machines. Tiny program with many powerful monitoring features, net stats, disk stats, logging, etc. http://et.redhat.com/~rjones/virt-top -------------- next part -------------- >From 4f6bd18d2e2a9c1d317a07b59072579d8fff42ac Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Richard W.M. Jones

Sadly you failed to set your email program to send plain text and the data is corrupted at my end. I also think you need to reduce the size of the data set... the intent here is to increase your understanding, not debug your particular analysis. I will say that I am having a very challenging time understanding what you are trying to accomplish though. What are the equations that you think need

I've mentioned this problem before but put off doing anything about it and maybe now someone can suggest the best solution. I have a 3-member RAID1 set where one of the members is periodically swapped and rotated offsite. The filesystem contains a backuppc archive which has millions of hardlinks that make it impractical to copy with a file-oriented approach. The current filesystem is

Hi, with being exposed to more and more failed hard disks reports, I've accumulated several questions of the logged messages in /var/log/messages file: like how to identifying failed disks(partitions), where is the exact failed sector(s) on the hard disk, and why badblocks reports OK to the reported disk failure. Let me explained the above with the following several example. scenario #1, a

On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 04:17:28AM -0400, Chen Hanxiao wrote: > This patch will add fields of sector size for: > - partition sector data size > - target partition sector data size > > Signed-off-by: Chen Hanxiao <chenhanxiao@cn.fujitsu.com> > --- > resize/resize.ml | 9 +++++---- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git

Hi, with being exposed to more and more failed hard disks reports, I've accumulated several questions of the logged messages in /var/log/messages file: like how to identifying failed disks(partitions), where is the exact failed sector(s) on the hard disk, and why badblocks reports OK to the reported disk failure. Let me explained the above with the following several example. scenario #1, a

This patch will add fields of sector size for: - partition sector data size - target partition sector data size Signed-off-by: Chen Hanxiao <chenhanxiao@cn.fujitsu.com> --- v2: realign the position of '+^ 1' resize/resize.ml | 9 +++++---- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/resize/resize.ml b/resize/resize.ml index 4e58e84..602a583 100644 ---

Hi list, I just received a storage array and created a 3TB LUN with a block/sector size on the disks of 4096. When I boot the our centos-4.4 box attached to this array I get the "unsupported sector size 4096" message: Remounting root filesystem in read-write mode: [ OK ] ERROR: unsupported sector size 4096 on /dev/sda. No RAID disks Setting up Logical Volume Management: [ OK ]

> Hi syslinux developers, > > As the title questions. > Would like to know the status about 4k sector size support. > > I use the latest code build and use these library. > Then try to boot on efi from my 4k sector size virtual devices. > It always hangs on bootloader. > > I try to use the same bootloader and library on 512 sector size > virtual devices and it