similar to: FLAC copyright

On Thursday 04 October 2007 04:27:47 you wrote: > Sir, you need to provide more information. What kind of errors? What > is not working? What exactly are you trying to do? What compiler are > you using? H IV0, we are using a lot of different cross-compiler (mainly based on GCC 3.4.x) When I tried to cross-compile FLAC for non-i386 platforms (such as ARM), I use use

--- Joshua Haberman <joshua@haberman.com> wrote: > * Josh Coalson (xflac@yahoo.com) wrote: > > I'm kind of swamped today so I'll answer what I can get > > away with until tonight: > > > > --- Joshua Haberman <joshua@haberman.com> wrote: > > > The most interesting questions to me are ones you didn't address: > > > > > >

Yes, it's finally here. See the homepage for details, but here's a summary: - 10-15% decoder speedup - 24-bit input support restored - more robust plugins - new metadata block for Vorbis-style tags - vastly improved metadata editor - fixed bug with pipes and Windows - new libFLAC++, a C++ object wrapper around libFLAC - new metadata editing interface in libFLAC and libFLAC++ - and

Hi, I'm a developer with the Rockbox project - http://www.rockbox.org - which is a written-from-scratch operating system and application suite designed for portable audio players. We of course support FLAC, and have a small, well-optimised (for embedded targets, including ARM) decoder which I think would be perfect for the devices Android runs on. It is based on the decoder from

Thanks for the info, Dave. Speed is a very important feature, but there might be some risk choosing the FFmpeg decoder. They've had trouble with their encoder in the past, which tells me it's possible your users might one day run into a valid FLAC that the FFmpeg decoder won't handle correctly. A better suggestion might be to start with libFLAC, optimize as needed, and

I've always wondered, why can't a simple LGPL/GPL double-license do the trick? -- Asheesh. On Tue, 15 Jan 2002, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 03:27:42PM -0500, Woodrow Stool wrote: > > > A while back Josh was thinking of changing the Flac license, and posted a > > question on Slashdot regarding various licensing schemes. > > > > Josh, have

--- Chris Csanady <cc@137.org> wrote: > Building the beta on the mac has one stumbling point: the ppc/as/ > libFLAC-asm.la is not currently built due to the configure define > FLaC__HAS_AS__TEMPORARILY_DISABLED, but it is expected to exist by > > libFLAC_la_LIBADD = ppc/as/libFLAC-asm.la > > in src/libFLAC/Makefile.am. After removing this line, it builds > and

Hi, I have been making an RPM of FLAC to bundle with GStreamer. In order to get it working I had to make some rather hackish solutions in the SPEC file. The flac Makefile does to build into the correct directories while creating an RPM for some reason. I have attached the SPEC file I ended up with if it is of interest. Of course it didn't help me much cause it turned up we had a bug in the

Josh Coalson <xflac@yahoo.com> wrote: > --- Eric Wong <eric@petta-tech.com> wrote: > > Just to let you guys know, I've been listening to FLAC (compression > > level 2 or lower) tunes on my 3rd generation ipod running ipodlinux > > (modified uCLinux) for the past few days. No skips or slow-downs > > whatsoever using MPD to play music. > > how

Josh Coalson <xflac@yahoo.com> wrote: > Yes, it's finally here. I'm looking into updating the OpenBSD port from 1.0.2 to 1.0.3 and I'm seeing some unhappiness in various regression tests: i386: | +++ libFLAC unit test: FLAC__SeekableStreamDecoder | | testing FLAC__seekable_stream_decoder_new()... OK | testing FLAC__seekable_stream_decoder_delete()... OK | testing

Hello, This is a patch to allow building of the project using MSYS, MinGW, and MinGW-w64 with the following invocation: make -f Makefile.lite libFLAC libFLAC++ flac metaflac test_libs_common test_libFLAC test_libFLAC++ test_grabbag test_seeking test_streams utils examples This patch addresses eight points: 1. `uname -p` in MSYS returns "unknown" so we must use `gcc -dumpmachine`

Josh Coalson <xflac@yahoo.com> wrote: > --- Scott F <graue@oceanbase.org> wrote: > > > If I use flac to encode with the --replay-gain > > option, I get a warning about the --no-padding > > option... > > > > "NOTE: --replay-gain may leave a small PADDING block even with > > --no-padding" > > > > ...even though I'm

Hello, This is a patch to allow building of the project using MSYS, MinGW, and MinGW-w64 with the following invocation: make -f Makefile.lite libFLAC libFLAC++ flac metaflac test_libs_common test_libFLAC test_libFLAC++ test_grabbag test_seeking test_streams utils examples This patch addresses eight points: 1. `uname -p` in MSYS returns "unknown" so we must use `gcc -dumpmachine`

--- John Steele Scott <toojays@toojays.net> wrote: > Josh Coalson <xflac@yahoo.com> writes: > > > --- John Steele Scott <toojays@toojays.net> wrote: > >> Back in October 2004, I did a bit of work on FLAC to get version > >> 1.1.1 to > >> build correctly under GNU/Linux/PPC. Only now have I realised that > >> somewhere > >>

Josh Coalson <xflac@yahoo.com> writes: > --- John Steele Scott <toojays@toojays.net> wrote: >> Back in October 2004, I did a bit of work on FLAC to get version >> 1.1.1 to >> build correctly under GNU/Linux/PPC. Only now have I realised that >> somewhere >> along the way something broke in FLAC's decoding. On my machine, >> roughly 50%

I tried to send this message via gmane a couple of weeks ago but it never got through moderation. So maybe the moderator is on holiday, or there is some other problem in the gmane->flac-dev connection? -------------------- Start of forwarded message -------------------- Newsgroups: gmane.comp.audio.compression.flac.devel Subject: A couple of points about flac 1.1.1 on ppc/linux/altivec

Josh Coalson <xflac@yahoo.com> wrote: > That is the question I put before you all tonight :) > > (Short background, Xiph is the corp behind Vorbis and Ogg, > among other things; see http://xiph.org/about.html . I > think Emmett is here now so correct any of this if it's > wrong.) > > I've been talking a little with Emmett Plant and Monty about > this.

sorry if I did not reply to this, answers below: --- Josh Green <josh@resonance.org> wrote: > On Tue, 2006-07-25 at 06:37 +0200, Josh Green wrote: > > A user of CRAM (http://swami.sourceforge.net/cram.php) sent in a > bug > > report related to decoding of CRAM files. This issue occurs with > > flac-1.1.2 but not previous versions (such as flac-1.1.1). Note >

--- Harry Sack <tranzedude@gmail.com> wrote: > 2007/9/8, Josh Coalson <xflac@yahoo.com>: > > > > it actually is complicated. the libFLAC api is not suited to a > > multithreaded design because the i/o is stream-based, not file- > > based. flac(.exe) is the file-based wrapper around libFLAC that > > allows it to work on files. the way libFLAC buffers

* Josh Coalson (xflac@yahoo.com) wrote: > I'm kind of swamped today so I'll answer what I can get > away with until tonight: > > --- Joshua Haberman <joshua@haberman.com> wrote: > > The most interesting questions to me are ones you didn't address: > > > > 1. Will Ogg FLAC become the default manifestation of the FLAC codec? > > If not, why