similar to: 0.10 almost ready

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 8000 matches similar to: "0.10 almost ready"

2004 Sep 10
4
the road to 1.0...
This is a fantastic selling point, and one that I've never really thought of. Back in the early days of etree (a whole three years ago ;) ), before we learned the virtues of MD5 sums for SHN downloads, I downloaded a Hornsby show from someone. Of course, an MD5 wasn't available, but when I decompressed and Shoren didn't throw a sanity error my way, I figured all was well. I burned
1999 Jul 16
1
R-0.64.2 ssize_t not defined in src/unix/sock.h
I though I should let you all know of this: Trying to build R-0.62.2 on a SunOS xxxx 4.1.4 2 sun4m machine using gcc (gcc version egcs-2.91.57 19980901 (egcs-1.1 release)): gnumake[2]: Entering directory `/tmp_mnt/xxxx/src/R-0.64.2/src/unix' gcc -g -O2 -I../include -I../../src/include -c Rsock.c -o Rsock.o In file included from Rsock.c:8: sock.h:21: parse error before `Sock_read'
2010 Jun 09
2
Question on trying to build R 2.11.1 on Tru64(aka OSF1)
First I tried 'setenv R_SHELL /usr/local/bin/bash', as bash is the weapon of choice for the faculty wishing to use R, then ran ./configure as before. The ./configure output line using as R_SHELL for scripts ... /usr/local/bin/bash would seem to indicate that the R_SHELL environment variable was recognized and acknowledged. However, I got the same build error: gnumake[2]: Entering
2010 Jun 08
3
Question on trying to build R 2.11.1 on Tru64(aka OSF1) system
Hello, I am trying to build the R-2.11.1 software for university faculty to use in research projects on a DEC/Compaq/HP AlphaServer model GS160 16CPU/64GB memory running Tru64Unix aka OSF1 version 5.1B-5. Is it known whether it is possible to build the R-2.11.1 software on the platform I am using? In my attempts to build the R-2.11.1 software, I first used the native C and Fortran 77/90/95
2004 Sep 10
1
flac worse than shorten ON SOME FILES
had to fix the subject... was getting under my skin! yeah, could you put up the FLAC version of the worst track that is less than 20 megs compressed? (I'll have to grab it with a 56k modem). by worst I mean the one where shorten beats flac by the most. also: 1. what version of shorten are you using? 2. what command-line options for flac and shorten did you use on this track? thanks, Josh
2004 Sep 10
2
flac worse than shorten
On Wed, 7 Feb 2001, Josh Coalson wrote: > Mark, if it's possible, can you do me a favor... > Try encoding the album as individual tracks and > compare sizes. The reason I ask is because of > the way FLAC frames are numbered in the frame > headers (if you check the format page you'll see > what I mean). Sorry, I don't :( I've split into individual files and
2003 Oct 24
2
Missing "ISO8859-1.so" on Tru64Unix
Hello, I am testing Samba 3.0.0 on a Tru64Unix v 5.1b. I compile it with gcc et gnumake. I am able to start it and I can see a share. Until now, I have only one problem: Logs are full of messages like "Error loading module '/usr/local/samba/lib/charset/ISO8859-1.so': dlopen: Can't open needed library: /usr/local/samba/lib/charset/ISO8859-1.so" In fact, I don't find
2004 Sep 10
2
flac can occasionally be worse than shorten
well, I took a look at the files. from my knowledge of shorten there are two things it does that flac doesn't do: 1. it estimates the mean of the signal for each block, subtracts it out and stores it separately. but this is pretty useless for the predictors that shorten uses as they are pretty insensitive to the mean (try different values of -m from 0 to whatever and note practically no
2013 Jan 03
2
Sas by function in R
Hello, It's an alternative to use SAS by function in R? I want to plot d histograms by plot.from example bellow: Thank you! plot d 1 1 16.3 2 1 25.0 3 1 57.8 4 1 17.0 5 2 10.8 13 2 96.4 17 3 76.0 18 3 32.0 19 3 11.0 20 3 11.0 24 3 106.0 25 3 12.5 21 4 19.3 22 4 12.0 26 4 15.0 27 5 99.3 32 7 11.0 36
1999 Dec 09
1
solaris 2.5.1 still no good
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi folks, Here's what I get under solaris 2.5.1 (sparc) with gcc-2.95.2 and gnumake 3.78-something : bsd-snprintf.c: In function `msetup': bsd-snprintf.c:67: warning: implicit declaration of function `getpagesize' bsd-snprintf.c:72: `x' undeclared (first use in this function) bsd-snprintf.c:72: (Each undeclared identifier is reported
1998 Dec 08
0
R compile problems with AIX
Hello, I've allways had some problems compiling R (R-62.x and R-63.x) on a AIX 4.2.1 System to the end: make produces following output: ... ... mkdir ../../../library/eda/R ld: 0711-327 WARNING: Entry point not found: __start ld: 0711-244 ERROR: No csects or exported symbols have been saved. gnumake[4]: *** [eda.so] Error 8 gnumake[3]: *** [all] Error 1 gnumake[2]: *** [R] Error 1 gnumake[1]:
1998 Dec 08
0
R compile problems with AIX
Hello, I've allways had some problems compiling R (R-62.x and R-63.x) on a AIX 4.2.1 System to the end: make produces following output: ... ... mkdir ../../../library/eda/R ld: 0711-327 WARNING: Entry point not found: __start ld: 0711-244 ERROR: No csects or exported symbols have been saved. gnumake[4]: *** [eda.so] Error 8 gnumake[3]: *** [all] Error 1 gnumake[2]: *** [R] Error 1 gnumake[1]:
2009 Jan 21
1
[LLVMdev] Errors while building and installation of llvm-1.9
I have downloaded the llvm-1.9 from the following link http://llvm.org/releases/download.html#1.9 There are some header files missing and I am getting some compilation errors of the source code when I compiled the llvm-1.9. Can you please send me the correct source code. I am getting the following errors when I compiled the llvm-1.9 on linux-ubuntu with the following command. make -k | tee
1999 Feb 12
0
Installing on DEC 4.0b
> To: Jonathan.Yuen at tvs.slu.se > Cc: "G.Janacek" <G.Janacek at uea.ac.uk>, r-help at stat.math.ethz.ch > Subject: Re: [R] Installing on DEC 4.0b > From: Peter Dalgaard BSA <p.dalgaard at biostat.ku.dk> > Date: 12 Feb 1999 13:25:18 +0100 > > Jonathan.Yuen at tvs.slu.se writes: > > > I don't know how well it is documented, but you need gnu
2014 Jun 07
2
asterisk-users Digest, Vol 119, Issue 7
I changed in asterisk.conf mindtmfduration = 50 The inter-digit duration is for this function SendDTMF when we dial out dtmf The question is, how do I change it without changing the source code? On Sat, Jun 7, 2014 at 1:00 PM, <asterisk-users-request at lists.digium.com> wrote: > Send asterisk-users mailing list submissions to > asterisk-users at lists.digium.com > > To
2004 Sep 10
1
Re: flac and pipes problems (was: Possible bug)
I'll rearrange a little and respond: --- Mark Powell <M.S.Powell@salford.ac.uk> wrote: > Also, when flac takes input from stdin it fails to > fill in the wav size > fields correctly, whereas shorten has no problems > with this: i.e. >... > You can see it puts a data chunk size of zero in > there. > OK, this has been fixed in CVS. > Flac refuses
2008 Oct 21
4
[LLVMdev] Replacing llvm-gcc in Xcode 3.1.1 with svn version
Hello all, I have replaced the llvm-gcc shipped with the Xcode by the latest version and I was wondering if I have missed something... (everything *seems* to work). Here's what I did: 0. Checkout LLVM (and clang) + llvm-gcc 1. Build LLVM (with clang) and install into /Developer/usr/local : # mkdir llvmobj # cd llvmobj # CC=gcc-4.2 CXX=g++-4.2 ../llvm/configure
2004 Sep 10
3
Non-audio applications
Hi, I work for a company which makes meteor and wind radar (http://www.gsoft.com.au). On occasion (ie during meteor showers such as the Leonids) we configure the system to save raw data as it comes out of the acquisition system, the data rate for this varies (depends on acquisition parameters and number of coherent integrations etc), but usually it is around 600kb/sec. The data consists of 16
2004 Sep 10
3
FLAC status
Hi, How's the testing going? I compressed 194 individual .wav files (totaling 8.54GB) which contained tracks ripped from many varied albums. I unflacced them and compared their md5 signature with the same from the original .wav. They were all perfect. I didn't use the -V option just in case of any chance of mis-reporting. I hope to test it with the complete collection of ~41GB
2000 May 17
2
samba-2.0.7 build in separate directory fails
I try to compile samba-2.07 in a separate directory and it fails with : Linking bin/smbd ld: 0711-934 SEVERE ERROR: Cannot create the output file: bin/smbd ld:open() A file or directory in the path name does not exist. collect2: ld returned 12 exit status gnumake: *** [bin/smbd] Error 1 because the directory `bin' does not exist in my build directory; the