similar to: 0.9 problems

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2000 matches similar to: "0.9 problems"

2004 Sep 10
3
0.9 problems
On Sat, May 19, 2001 at 12:55:08AM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > On Sat, May 19, 2001 at 02:05:14AM +0000, Christian Weisgerber wrote: > > > Problems in FLAC 0.9: > > > > - On alpha, flac immediately dumps core for both encoding and > > decoding (FreeBSD/alpha). > > I have reproduced this on Debian/alpha as well. I will spend some time > debugging it
2004 Sep 10
2
Re: 0.9 problems
On Sat, May 19, 2001 at 12:19:39PM +0000, Christian Weisgerber wrote: > Christian Weisgerber <naddy@mips.inka.de> wrote: > > > Problems in FLAC 0.9: > > Also: > > ===> Building for flac-0.9 > cd . && aclocal > aclocal: configure.in: 7: macro `AM_PROG_LIBTOOL' not found in library > aclocal: configure.in: 22: macro `AM_PATH_XMMS' not
2004 Sep 10
3
Re: 0.9 problems
Matt Zimmerman <mdz@debian.org> wrote: > Aha. In FLAC__fixed_restore_signal, the index variable 'i' is declared > unsigned, then used like so: [...] With the following trivial patch applied, > everything works on Alpha, at least with my test sample. Against 0.9 or CVS? While this clearly fixes a bug, 0.9 still dies for me. #0 0x1600692a8 in
2004 Sep 10
5
Re: beta 10 candidate checked in
> > > $ aclocal && autoconf && automake -c -a -i > > > aclocal: configure.in: 45: macro `AM_PATH_XMMS' not found in > library > > > > my hunch is that your version of either automake or possibly > > autoconf is not recent enough. > > No. He simply doesn't have xmms installed. That's what I mentioned > a while ago:
2004 Sep 10
2
beta 10 candidate checked in
> > > AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE(flac, 0.9) > > > > > > I've never had to run autoconf manually before so I'm not really > sure > > what > > > I'm doing. > > > > > hmm... not sure what the syntax error is; did you run aclocal > first? > > No. Had no idea I had to. I've gleaned from someone else's message > that I
2004 Sep 10
6
beta 10 candidate checked in
I have checked in all the latest into CVS and am going to start the test suite again. if all goes well I will probably release this as beta 10. this one should have all the configure stuff working with the new assembly infrastructure. I have tried to make it as easy as possible to port routines to assembly. all that's really needed now is to write the corresponding routine for a specific
2004 Sep 10
9
FLAC 1.0.4 released
I uploaded the source tarball and binary releases for win32 and redhat 7. Solaris package should be ready tomorrow. See the news item for all the improvements from 1.0.3: http://flac.sourceforge.net/news.html#20020924 Developers, see the new Doxygen-based API docs: http://flac.sourceforge.net/api/index.html Thanks again to all the contributors and testers. Josh
2004 Sep 10
5
Re: beta 10 candidate checked in
Christian Weisgerber <naddy@mips.inka.de> wrote: > | # nasm build rule: > | %.lo: %.s Even with gmake, this really works only by accident. Automake generates a competing suffix rule, and gmake apparently gives the rule above a higher priority than the suffix rule (or that just happens to be the evaluation order). Matt, since you seem to understand automake, can you come up with
2004 Sep 10
2
Re: 0.9 problems
Matt Zimmerman <mdz@debian.org> wrote: > 0.9. As I said, I was using an 8-bit sample, Ah, that didn't quite register with me. I'm using a CD-style 44.1kHz/stereo/16-bit test file. > to avoid dealing with endian issues in the file format. I don't > know whether any of those exist or not. I don't think so. 0.9 works fine on i386 (little) and sparc (big), and
2004 Sep 10
2
Re: 0.9 problems
On Sat, May 19, 2001 at 06:42:22PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > I think this could be fixed by changing the (data_len > 0) test to be > (data_len > 0 && total_error_X > 0). Yes, this appears to have worked. I can now correctly encode and decode both my 8kHz/8-bit/mono sample, and a 44.1kHz/16-bit/stereo sample on Debian/alpha. Attached is a patch which combines this fix
2004 Sep 10
4
beta 10 candidate checked in
> > I have checked in all the latest into CVS and am going to start the > > test suite again. if all goes well I will probably release this as > > beta 10. > > > > anyway, try it out and let me know if anything bad happens! it > > should be a short jump from beta 10 to 1.0. > > I've just checked out the latest from scratch. There is no configure
2004 Sep 10
1
Re: beta 10 candidate checked in
> > Now I have done some more reading, and I don't think simply > > putting the call to AM_PATH_XMMS an acinclude.m4 will help him. > > No, of course not. You need to put the macro _definition_, i.e. ... > > > This macro is defined in /usr/local/share/aclocal/xmms.m4 > > ... xmms.m4 into acinclude.m4. (Putting it into aclocal.m4 may or > may > not
2004 Sep 10
4
FLAC 1.0.1 source release out
The source release for 1.0.1 is finally up on sourceforge. If you are compiling for x86 make sure to read the note in in the README about automake 1.5. Josh __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Find the one for you at Yahoo! Personals http://personals.yahoo.com
2004 Sep 10
2
Re: beta 10 candidate checked in
--- Christian Weisgerber <naddy@mips.inka.de> wrote: > Josh Coalson <xflac@yahoo.com> wrote: > > > I have checked in all the latest into CVS and am going to start the > > test suite again. if all goes well I will probably release this as > > beta 10. > > What's the sequence of steps required to turn this into a buildable > distribution? >
2004 Sep 10
5
detecting host machine in configure.in?
I am trying to set up a flexible infrastructure for the assembly code. Basically what I want is configure.in determination of basic machine type (intel/compatible, alpha, ppc), then within that (say intel) the code will detect variants like MMX, SSE, and use the right routines. I know how to do the second, but what is a good way to do the first? Linux/Cygwin/Solaris seem to support the MACHTYPE
2004 Sep 10
5
ERROR: mismatch in decoded data, verify FAILED!
> > I also had this verify error encoding a wav I ripped from a CD. I > didn't > > report this as it happended on flac running on debian linux > -current unstable. > > This error happened only with one track of a CD I was ripping. > > > > Another reason for me not reporting this was, that flac 1.0 running > on OpenBSD > > 2.9 encoded the wav with
2003 Mar 10
3
Configure problems
I'm trying to compile on an Amiga for PPC using GNU but the configure script stops at this for libvorbis: <p>aclocal: configure.in: 42: macro `AM_PROG_LIBTOOL' not found in library make: *** [aclocal.m4] Error 1 <p>and this for libao: <p>checking size of short... configure: error: can not run test program while cross compiling How do I fix this? <p>J.Johansson
2008 Jan 25
7
vorbis-tools 1.2.0 Release Candidate
I bumped the version number of vorbis-tools and am preparing it for an eventual release in a few days. A changelog of what's new may be found at [1]. Meanwhile, what's in SVN is a "Release Candidate" to find out if anything was broken since version 1.1.1. Report any (or lack of) problems you may find, so we'll be able to put out a new version of vorbis-tools. -Ivo [1]
2004 Sep 10
3
FLAC 1.0.3 is out
Yes, it's finally here. See the homepage for details, but here's a summary: - 10-15% decoder speedup - 24-bit input support restored - more robust plugins - new metadata block for Vorbis-style tags - vastly improved metadata editor - fixed bug with pipes and Windows - new libFLAC++, a C++ object wrapper around libFLAC - new metadata editing interface in libFLAC and libFLAC++ - and
2004 Sep 10
2
1.0 souce released
OK, I did the last few patches and made the source release. Hope I got everything. I'll send out the standard announcement now. Thanks everyone. Josh __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messenger http://phonecard.yahoo.com/