similar to: ogg-flac?

--- Matt Zimmerman <mdz@debian.org> wrote: > Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2001 18:40:38 -0500 > From: Matt Zimmerman <mdz@debian.org> > To: flac-dev@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: Re: [Flac-dev] ogg-flac? > > On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 11:34:04AM -0800, Josh Coalson wrote: > > > --- "smoerk@gmx.de" <smoerk@gmx.de> wrote: > > > hi, > >

--- Matt Zimmerman <mdz@debian.org> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 11:34:04AM -0800, Josh Coalson wrote: > > > --- "smoerk@gmx.de" <smoerk@gmx.de> wrote: > > > hi, > > > > > > would it be possible to use ogg as container for flac? so you > could use all > > > the features of the ogg format. > > > > > A long

On Mon, Jun 04, 2001 at 06:04:53PM -0700, Josh Coalson wrote: > --- "smoerk@gmx.de" <smoerk@gmx.de> wrote: > > is there a solution to stream flac files? maybe it's possible to > stream > > a ogg-flac file through the icecast2 server, but is ogg-flac working? > > > I think Matt Zimmerman hacked one version to write FLAC into an Ogg wrapper > but

--- Matt Zimmerman <mdz@debian.org> wrote: > On Fri, Nov 09, 2001 at 11:33:17AM -0800, Josh Coalson wrote: > > > I have checked in a few changes worth noting: > > > > 1. I split the file decoder into a more general 'seekable > > stream decoder' which, makes the file decoder just a special > > case of the seekable stream decoder. this is useful

I agree, but the idea behind the OGG formats is to build patent free codecs. Is FLAC really patent-free ? And does the OGG team agree to include FLAC in their specs ? smoerk wrote: > I agree. I think Ogg/Flac does not make sense, if it's not in the > official distribution. the benefits: > > - many ogg players could play flac > - flac could be integrated in oggenc (oggdrop)

On Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 06:46:22PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > [0] By the way, flac seems to segfault early on IA64. When built with > --enable-debug, I get a failed assertion: > > flac 0.10, Copyright (C) 2000,2001 Josh Coalson > flac comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY. This is free software, and you are > welcome to redistribute it under certain conditions. Type

retitle 119396 flac: Decoded raw data does not match original raw data thanks On Tue, Nov 13, 2001 at 02:38:32AM +0000, Adam M. Costello wrote: > Matt Zimmerman <mdz@debian.org> wrote: > > > Based on a few quick tests, this kind of problem seems to occur with > > any file smaller than 4k (at least when using 44100Hz/16bps/2chan). > > I don't think the problem

is there a solution to stream flac files? maybe it's possible to stream a ogg-flac file through the icecast2 server, but is ogg-flac working? smoerk

On Tue, Nov 20, 2001 at 02:18:16PM +0100, smoerk wrote: > how could i play ogg/flac files? > > would it be possible to add flac support to the ogg libaries? > > i would like to stream ogg/flac files over an icecast2 / jroar server > :). What would be required is support for ogg/flac in the streaming client (and perhaps in the server, depending on how sophisticated it is), by

I have checked in a few changes worth noting: 1. I split the file decoder into a more general 'seekable stream decoder' which, makes the file decoder just a special case of the seekable stream decoder. this is useful in situations where you are trying to add decoding support to something that has abstracted the file away. the file decoder interface is still identical, it is all backward

On Fri, Jul 20, 2001 at 08:14:55PM -0700, Josh Coalson wrote: > --- Matt Zimmerman <mdz@debian.org> wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 20, 2001 at 10:51:11PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > > > > > This version seems to work at least partially on ia64. I am able > > to encode my > > > usual test WAV file now, but I still get a segfault during the > >

On Fri, Jul 20, 2001 at 02:42:21PM -0700, Josh Coalson wrote: > --- Matt Zimmerman <mdz@debian.org> wrote: > > It does work, but gives a warning: > > > > *** Warning: Linking the shared library libFLAC.la against the *** static > > library ia32/libFLAC-asm.a is not portable! > > > > I think this is just because libtool can't determine whether the

Have you considered trying to have FLAC become an official part of the Ogg project? Ogg has Vorbis but no lossless codec, and FLAC is already production quality. You've already written the code to wrap FLAC in an Ogg bitstream. Ogg Squish seems to be abandoned, and it would be a grand waste of effort to revive it when FLAC already works so well. The Ogg people would be much better off

--- Matt Zimmerman <mdz@debian.org> wrote: > I noticed that you bumped the library version for this release. In > fact, > you incremened it twice. FLAC 1.0.2 shipped with libFLAC.so.1, while > 1.0.3beta seems to have libFLAC.so.3. It should never be necessary > to > increment the version more than once between releases; at first > glance, I > wonder whether

Matt Zimmerman <mdz@debian.org> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 08:11:13PM +0100, Steve Lhomme wrote: > > > Well, I think going GPL would be too much, only GPL softwares could use > > the library. > > This is a common misconception, but entirely untrue. There are many > free software licenses, including the BSD-style licenses, which are > compatible with the

--- Matt Zimmerman <mdz@debian.org> wrote: > On Fri, Jul 20, 2001 at 05:15:21PM -0700, Josh Coalson wrote: > > > I rethought it and it seemed like a bad idea to post > > a big file, so you can get it here: > > > > > http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/flac/junk/flac-1.0-src-candidate.tar.bz2 > > With the attached patch, a complete

* Matt Zimmerman (mdz@debian.org) wrote: > I agree with Josh (the other one) that abstraction libraries like > libaudiofile are a good way to make this a zero-maintenance feature. > Theoretically, support for new formats can be added to the library, and > all programs using that library will become instantly able to handle it. This is clearly the best solution. However, no abstraction

--- Matt Zimmerman <mdz@debian.org> wrote: > The only difference in the command lines seems to be that your > xmms-config > explicitly links with -lgthread, while I suppose mine lets the > dynamic linker > pull it in. The only significant difference between the old and new > _LIBADD > lines is that @XMMS_LIBS@ is at the beginning in the new one. Now > that I think

--- Matt Zimmerman <mdz@debian.org> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 11:11:24PM -0700, Josh Coalson wrote: > > > I have just finished uploading the source release for FLAC 1.0.4 > beta > > to Sourceforge; there are no binary releases. See the included > > doc/html/news.html for the changes since 1.0.3; there are quite a > few. > > > > >

--- Matt Zimmerman <mdz@debian.org> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 31, 2001 at 04:36:23PM -0800, Josh Coalson wrote: > > > - split the usage screen into a short and a long version. the > short > > version is the default, and you can use 'flac -H' to get the long > > version. > > It would be a good idea for the longer help text to go to stdout, > rather