similar to: Odd xmms plugin behavior

--- Matt Zimmerman <mdz@debian.org> wrote: > Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2001 18:09:51 -0500 > From: Matt Zimmerman <mdz@debian.org> > To: flac-dev@lists.sourceforge.net > CC: Josh Coalson <xflac@yahoo.com> > Subject: Re: [Flac-dev] Re: Odd xmms plugin behavior > > On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 11:46:52AM -0800, Josh Coalson wrote: > > > hmm, you must have found a

hmm, you must have found a bug. the format does support other resolutions and sample rates, and the test suite does include numerous 8 bps mono files, so it's probably in the plugin itself. if you 'flac -t' the encoded 8-bit mono file, does it test ok? Josh --- Matt Zimmerman <mdz@debian.org> wrote: > While testing out the xmms plugin, I found that the 0.8 plugin would

I'll be forwarding some posts from Matt since the list is blocking him out... --- Matt Zimmerman <mdz@debian.org> wrote: > Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 18:22:31 -0500 > From: Matt Zimmerman <mdz@debian.org> > To: flac-dev@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: Odd xmms plugin behavior > > While testing out the xmms plugin, I found that the 0.8 plugin would not play a >

On Fri, Jul 20, 2001 at 03:13:31PM -0700, Josh Coalson wrote: > --- Matt Zimmerman <mdz@debian.org> wrote: > > Basically, you are allowed to specify object code, whether in shared or > > static libraries, normal object files, libtool libraries, and libtool > > object files. libtool figures out any magic that needs to be done to > > actually link those objects

--- Matt Zimmerman <mdz@debian.org> wrote: > Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2001 22:05:48 -0500 > From: Matt Zimmerman <mdz@debian.org> > To: flac-dev@lists.sourceforge.net > CC: Josh Coalson <xflac@yahoo.com> > Subject: Re: [Flac-dev] Normalize? > > On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 01:39:32PM -0800, Josh Coalson wrote: > > > --- "Jesse W. Hathaway"

--- Matt Zimmerman <mdz@debian.org> wrote: > I did not catch the beginning of this thread. What is the bug? > yeah, the thread's about a month old. you can see the whole thing here: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_id=738315&forum_id=6312 basically on OS X Ben's libtool is trying to "relink" libxmms-flac with the installed libFLAC before

On Fri, Jul 20, 2001 at 01:06:53PM -0700, Josh Coalson wrote: > > xmmsinputplugin_LTLIBRARIES = libxmms-flac.la > > libxmms_flac_la_SOURCES = plugin.c > > -libxmms_flac_la_LIBADD = -L$(top_builddir)/src/libFLAC/.libs -lFLAC > > @XMMS_LIBS@ > > +libxmms_flac_la_LIBADD = @XMMS_LIBS@ > > $(top_builddir)/src/libFLAC/libFLAC.la > > libxmms_flac_la_LDFLAGS =

--- Matt Zimmerman <mdz@debian.org> wrote: > The only difference in the command lines seems to be that your > xmms-config > explicitly links with -lgthread, while I suppose mine lets the > dynamic linker > pull it in. The only significant difference between the old and new > _LIBADD > lines is that @XMMS_LIBS@ is at the beginning in the new one. Now > that I think

On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 10:11:49PM +0200, Miroslav Lichvar wrote: > On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 11:07:09AM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > > severity 200435 normal > > thanks > > > > I received this bug report from a Debian user. I can't think of any reason > > offhand why the command line tool would work while the xmms plugin would > > fail. > ... >

Matt Zimmerman <mdz@debian.org> wrote: > I received this bug report from a Debian user. > Xmms-flac has problems with files longer than 55 minutes and 54 seconds. > It shows the files (and length) correctly in the playlist, but as soon as I > start playing such a file, the length kind of switches to 55:54. I can still > play these files completely, but the remaining

On Thu, Jun 27, 2002 at 05:15:17AM -0700, Ben Hines wrote: > On Wednesday, June 26, 2002, at 04:12 PM, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > >Was this problem new in the 1.0.3 beta? My 1.0.2 packages do not have > >any such problem; I didn't notice any weirdness with 1.0.3beta, but the > >packages have probably only been built on my machine so far. > > How are you buildling

--- Matt Zimmerman <mdz@debian.org> wrote: > On Fri, Jul 20, 2001 at 08:14:55PM -0700, Josh Coalson wrote: > > > --- Matt Zimmerman <mdz@debian.org> wrote: > > > On Fri, Jul 20, 2001 at 10:51:11PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > > > > > > > This version seems to work at least partially on ia64. I am > > > able > > > to

On Fri, Jul 20, 2001 at 08:14:55PM -0700, Josh Coalson wrote: > --- Matt Zimmerman <mdz@debian.org> wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 20, 2001 at 10:51:11PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > > > > > This version seems to work at least partially on ia64. I am able > > to encode my > > > usual test WAV file now, but I still get a segfault during the > >

On Tue, Jan 22, 2002 at 10:58:02PM -0500, Asheesh Laroia wrote: > The best I can suggest is, run XMMS on repeat mode for a few hours. The > flac plugin will, if my setup isn't bizarre (it's just debian testing), > eventually give way. Just disable audio output or something, let it run > overnight, and see what state it's in in the morning. I'm sure the Oggs >

retitle 119396 flac: Decoded raw data does not match original raw data thanks On Tue, Nov 13, 2001 at 02:38:32AM +0000, Adam M. Costello wrote: > Matt Zimmerman <mdz@debian.org> wrote: > > > Based on a few quick tests, this kind of problem seems to occur with > > any file smaller than 4k (at least when using 44100Hz/16bps/2chan). > > I don't think the problem

--- Matt Zimmerman <mdz@debian.org> wrote: > retitle 119396 flac: Decoded raw data does not match original raw > data > thanks > > On Tue, Nov 13, 2001 at 02:38:32AM +0000, Adam M. Costello wrote: > > > Matt Zimmerman <mdz@debian.org> wrote: > > > > > Based on a few quick tests, this kind of problem seems to occur > with > > > any

I think I sent a bad patch for this one already, which used a _LIBS variable. There is no _LIBS variable. :-) So, the .la file should be specified directly in _LIBADD, with no linker flag syntax. libtool will figure it out. diff -u -r1.1.1.1 Makefile.am --- Makefile.am 29 Jan 2001 18:13:29 -0000 1.1.1.1 +++ Makefile.am 21 Jun 2001 19:27:31 -0000 @@ -9,5 +9,5 @@

severity 200435 normal thanks I received this bug report from a Debian user. I can't think of any reason offhand why the command line tool would work while the xmms plugin would fail. ----- Forwarded message from Stephan Niemz <st.n@gmx.net> ----- Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2003 10:24:57 +0200 From: Stephan Niemz <st.n@gmx.net> Resent-From: Stephan Niemz <st.n@gmx.net> To: Debian

This is mostly to Matt Zimmerman. The xmms package in unstable was updated to 1.2.6-1; that's fine. Then I noticed my XMMS would no longer play FLAC files. I run testing, not unstable, I thought. What could have happened? That change was propagated into testing without an xmms-flac update! Huh? This makes me wonder: xmms-flac 1.0.2-1 should depend on xmms = 1.2.5. I think because this

On Wednesday, June 26, 2002, at 04:12 PM, Matt Zimmerman wrote: >> > > Was this problem new in the 1.0.3 beta? My 1.0.2 packages do not have > any > such problem; I didn't notice any weirdness with 1.0.3beta, but the > packages > have probably only been built on my machine so far. > How are you buildling it? Do you use make install DESTDIR to build into your