similar to: What's left for 1.0?

--- Matt Zimmerman <mdz@debian.org> wrote: > Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2001 19:07:19 -0500 > From: Matt Zimmerman <mdz@debian.org> > To: flac-dev@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: Re: [Flac-dev] What's left for 1.0? > > On Thu, Mar 22, 2001 at 02:42:51PM -0800, Josh Coalson wrote: > > > > maybe tagging. i think that id3 tag isn't enough 'cause it >

All, FLAC is nearing an official version. I am going to release a 0.9 version first with the winamp2 plugin fixes (and some other small inprovements). but I want to ask the question now: As a user, what do you think is left to do before 1.0? FLAC is bound to have incremental improvements but are there any fundamental format or feature changes/additions that you think that should be made? I am

Hello, I heard from a coworker that there was something that changed recently with FLAC and ID3. I don't have ANY details on what that means, and was wondering what has changed. The only thing I see (in the changelog) is that plugins have removed support for ID3 tags. I'm curious because I have been using ID3 tags with FLAC (I store extra data such as album art with my media files,

--- Ron Cococcia <ron.cococcia@request.com> wrote: > Hello, > > I heard from a coworker that there was something that changed > recently > with FLAC and ID3. I don't have ANY details on what that means, and > was > wondering what has changed. The only thing I see (in the changelog) > is > that plugins have removed support for ID3 tags. > > I'm

thx oddsock for your detailed reply, I think I now understand the problem :) I'm currently using a php-script (mp3 toolbox - http://www.radiotoolbox.com/downloads/) to stream static mp3's on-demand, and this script obviously sends the icy-headers (which are the shoutcast metadata protocol, right?). however, I think that it would be a nice feature for icecast to support these

The protocol of sending of metadata over a stream (which is HTTP) does not allow for this type of thing. The problem is not necessarily the fact that the id3 tags are at the end of the files, as id3v2 does not have this restriction, but rather just the "agreed" upon protocol for handling metadata for streamed mp3s (and I'm only going to talk about mp3s here, since it's

> ID3 support was only dropped in the plugins. libFLAC still can > decode FLAC files that have ID3 tags (v1 or v2). it just ignores > them and there are no plans to change that in the future. OK, that's what I thought, but wanted to be sure. I've been updating some metadata handling routines in our application and heard something about this and was curious. > the spec

--- Joshua Haberman <joshua@haberman.com> wrote: > * Josh Coalson (xflac@yahoo.com) wrote: > > I'm kind of swamped today so I'll answer what I can get > > away with until tonight: > > > > --- Joshua Haberman <joshua@haberman.com> wrote: > > > The most interesting questions to me are ones you didn't address: > > > > > >

--- Asheesh Laroia <paulproteus@technologist.com> wrote: > However, I need its ID3 information. I need the client program > (i.e., > XMMS) to be able to look at a file and know its artist and title. > Those > are the only two required fields, as a matter of fact. > flac (the decoder) 'supports' ID3 and ID3v2 tags by ignoring them. The input plugins (including

I've been with FLAC since 0.7, and I've loved the FLAC files I've ripped with grip, converted from FLAC 0.8 to 0.9, and played constantly on my desktop. And then I noticed the truncated ID3 tags in my FLAC files. I at first thought the problem lied in FLAC; I posted to this list, hoping for a solution. But then I realized my trusty GRIP was the flawed program. Now re-ripping my

Does anyone know if there are any players that use the id3v2 album art people mention every so often? -- imalone

Alright. So, the tag proposal that has been labored over for some months has now been reclassified a bit. There new URL is now here: http://reactor-core.org/ogg-tag-recommendations.html And is prefaced by the following statement: "The following recommendations were developed by a community of Ogg/Vorbis users for their own use." I believe the implication is that this document

ah. I was only talking about removing support in the winamp2 and xmms plugins. the decoder libraries will still be able to skip over/ignore id3 tags as before. I think AudioReQuest and PhatNoise must be using their own code to read id3 tags, which won't be affected. Josh --- Steve Vasquez <steve.vasquez@request.com> wrote: > Hey Josh, > > We currently use id3 v1/2 in the

sorry for replying so late... --- E S <es0123@hotmail.com> wrote: > Can anyone relate any general tips for using flac on Windows for the > purpose > of archiving cd's? If I can nail down a solid, easy-to-use process, > I'm > happy to write it up and contribute it to the FLAC documentation > section for > the untold masses that I am sure will be soon

Where is id3lib used? I must admit that I only noticed it recently when trying to compile 1.1.1beta ... I had hoped that it would be used in the flac command-line tool to support conversion of AIFF and WAVE ID3 tags to FLAC tags, or something along those lines as an interim measure since unknown chunks are generally lost when compressing AIFF or WAVE. Is there any way the ID3 library

Hey Josh, We currently use id3 v1/2 in the AudioReQuest but are working to support Vorbis Comments in a future version. I do know that PhatNoise and Tag and Rename both use id3 as well. Just an FYI, you have to do what you have to do. Steven Vasquez Director of Product Marketing/Founder ReQuest Multimedia steve@request.com -----Original Message----- From: flac-dev-bounces@xiph.org

I've been using FLAC for just over two years now, and I've been on the list for as long. I asked in March of 2001 about ID3 V1 and V2, and learned that both are supported. However, since then FLAC has moved to being an Ogg project, and the Vorbis comment field seems to be more capable. More than once, if I recall correctly, I've read Josh Coalson cursing his support for ID3 tags.

I searched for libid3-3.8.so.3 with yum: # yum search \*libid3-3.8\* but it returns "No Matches found" Am I not searching correctly, or does this not exist in CentOS 5.7? tnx

On Thu, Mar 14, 2002 at 10:26:45AM -0700, Chris Hirsch wrote: > So there are no command line options like in oggenc to do artist and > misc tags? Sure if you've got a solution that I don't have to do from > scratch then post away! :-) the patch is located below. i have already submitted it to the author. http://www.bagu.org/flac.html i have also made a utility to calculate

Just finally getting around to this :-) I've never used abcde...looks like it'll be a winner in my book....just to understand...your patch (which does tagging) is against the original and only FLAC patch that enables abcde to do flac which is v1.9.9 and the newest is 2.0.3? or do I just patch your new patch against 2.03? Yeah I know I should just try it (and I'm sure I will) I