similar to: What's left for 1.0?

--- Matt Zimmerman <mdz@debian.org> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 22, 2001 at 02:42:51PM -0800, Josh Coalson wrote: > > > > maybe tagging. i think that id3 tag isn't enough 'cause it > supports only 30 > > > character strings and don't fulfil a requirement of > internationalization i > > > mentioned before. > > > > > The decoder

I've been with FLAC since 0.7, and I've loved the FLAC files I've ripped with grip, converted from FLAC 0.8 to 0.9, and played constantly on my desktop. And then I noticed the truncated ID3 tags in my FLAC files. I at first thought the problem lied in FLAC; I posted to this list, hoping for a solution. But then I realized my trusty GRIP was the flawed program. Now re-ripping my

It looks like libplugin_common.a is being linked into the shared object libxmms-flac.so. In that case, all of the objects in libplugin_common.a must be compiled with -fPIC. ----- Forwarded message from lamont+buildd@hp.com ----- Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2002 18:54:08 -0600 From: lamont+buildd@hp.com Resent-From: lamont+buildd@hp.com To: submit@bugs.debian.org Subject: Bug#162718:

On Tuesday, February 11, 2003, at 09:51 AM, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 05:14:45PM +0000, Christian Weisgerber wrote: > >> Ben Hines <bhines@alumni.ucsd.edu> wrote: >> >>> The patch fixed the problem with your libs. However, when linking the >>> xmms plugin i still get: >>> >>> *** Warning: This library needs some

Hello, I heard from a coworker that there was something that changed recently with FLAC and ID3. I don't have ANY details on what that means, and was wondering what has changed. The only thing I see (in the changelog) is that plugins have removed support for ID3 tags. I'm curious because I have been using ID3 tags with FLAC (I store extra data such as album art with my media files,

--- Ron Cococcia <ron.cococcia@request.com> wrote: > Hello, > > I heard from a coworker that there was something that changed > recently > with FLAC and ID3. I don't have ANY details on what that means, and > was > wondering what has changed. The only thing I see (in the changelog) > is > that plugins have removed support for ID3 tags. > > I'm

severity 200435 normal thanks I received this bug report from a Debian user. I can't think of any reason offhand why the command line tool would work while the xmms plugin would fail. ----- Forwarded message from Stephan Niemz <st.n@gmx.net> ----- Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2003 10:24:57 +0200 From: Stephan Niemz <st.n@gmx.net> Resent-From: Stephan Niemz <st.n@gmx.net> To: Debian

thx oddsock for your detailed reply, I think I now understand the problem :) I'm currently using a php-script (mp3 toolbox - http://www.radiotoolbox.com/downloads/) to stream static mp3's on-demand, and this script obviously sends the icy-headers (which are the shoutcast metadata protocol, right?). however, I think that it would be a nice feature for icecast to support these

The protocol of sending of metadata over a stream (which is HTTP) does not allow for this type of thing. The problem is not necessarily the fact that the id3 tags are at the end of the files, as id3v2 does not have this restriction, but rather just the "agreed" upon protocol for handling metadata for streamed mp3s (and I'm only going to talk about mp3s here, since it's

On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 05:14:45PM +0000, Christian Weisgerber wrote: > Ben Hines <bhines@alumni.ucsd.edu> wrote: > > > The patch fixed the problem with your libs. However, when linking the > > xmms plugin i still get: > > > > *** Warning: This library needs some functionality provided by -lstdc++. > > This is because of id3lib, which is written in

> ID3 support was only dropped in the plugins. libFLAC still can > decode FLAC files that have ID3 tags (v1 or v2). it just ignores > them and there are no plans to change that in the future. OK, that's what I thought, but wanted to be sure. I've been updating some metadata handling routines in our application and heard something about this and was curious. > the spec

--- Joshua Haberman <joshua@haberman.com> wrote: > * Josh Coalson (xflac@yahoo.com) wrote: > > I'm kind of swamped today so I'll answer what I can get > > away with until tonight: > > > > --- Joshua Haberman <joshua@haberman.com> wrote: > > > The most interesting questions to me are ones you didn't address: > > > > > >

On Wednesday, February 5, 2003, at 10:47 PM, Josh Coalson wrote: > --- Matt Zimmerman <mdz@debian.org> wrote: > > good, very good. it may take me a little bit to get to it > since I'm starting a new job next week. > > Ben, can you inspect the patch and confirm that it covers > what you also suggested? The patch fixed the problem with your libs. However, when

--- Asheesh Laroia <paulproteus@technologist.com> wrote: > However, I need its ID3 information. I need the client program > (i.e., > XMMS) to be able to look at a file and know its artist and title. > Those > are the only two required fields, as a matter of fact. > flac (the decoder) 'supports' ID3 and ID3v2 tags by ignoring them. The input plugins (including

All, FLAC is nearing an official version. I am going to release a 0.9 version first with the winamp2 plugin fixes (and some other small inprovements). but I want to ask the question now: As a user, what do you think is left to do before 1.0? FLAC is bound to have incremental improvements but are there any fundamental format or feature changes/additions that you think that should be made? I am

Does anyone know if there are any players that use the id3v2 album art people mention every so often? -- imalone

On Fri, Jul 20, 2001 at 08:14:55PM -0700, Josh Coalson wrote: > --- Matt Zimmerman <mdz@debian.org> wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 20, 2001 at 10:51:11PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > > > > > This version seems to work at least partially on ia64. I am able > > to encode my > > > usual test WAV file now, but I still get a segfault during the > >

Alright. So, the tag proposal that has been labored over for some months has now been reclassified a bit. There new URL is now here: http://reactor-core.org/ogg-tag-recommendations.html And is prefaced by the following statement: "The following recommendations were developed by a community of Ogg/Vorbis users for their own use." I believe the implication is that this document

I'll be forwarding some posts from Matt since the list is blocking him out... --- Matt Zimmerman <mdz@debian.org> wrote: > Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 18:22:31 -0500 > From: Matt Zimmerman <mdz@debian.org> > To: flac-dev@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: Odd xmms plugin behavior > > While testing out the xmms plugin, I found that the 0.8 plugin would not play a >

--- Matt Zimmerman <mdz@debian.org> wrote: > Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2001 18:40:38 -0500 > From: Matt Zimmerman <mdz@debian.org> > To: flac-dev@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: Re: [Flac-dev] ogg-flac? > > On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 11:34:04AM -0800, Josh Coalson wrote: > > > --- "smoerk@gmx.de" <smoerk@gmx.de> wrote: > > > hi, > >