similar to: Opinions Please

It seems to me that ipsecnat tunnel type is not complete. Latest drafts of ipsec nat-traversal use udp port 4500 for nat-traversal communications. (It''s called port floating). That is needed to get rid of ugly ipsec passthru devices. Now ipsecnat opens port udp/500 from any source port. And I think ipsecnat won''t work at all with gw zone defined? I''m not sure about

Tuomo Soini wrote: > You don''t happen to read shorewall-devel mailinglist ? I read it -- I just didn''t know what to make of your post and it arrived while I was on vacation. What exactly are you trying to accomplish that Shorewall isn''t doing for you now? e.g. /etc/shorewall/zones rw Roadwarriors Road Warriors /etc/shorewall/interfraces rw ipsec+

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I''m running systems with openswan and modified _updown script supporting shorewall dynamic hosts. Because on problems with cvs head version of openswan I found a error from shorewall dynamic hosts support. When host is already in zone shorewall aborts adding process with error. This is not good thing(tm). I found out that deleting host from

I found a minor problem in new logging system. New logging system limits zone-names effectively to 4 characters. If you have REJECT policy between 2 zones which have 5 characters long, here example ipsec zone, I iptables will give error because logprefix is limited to 29 characters. --log-prefix "Shorewall:ipsec2ipsec:1:REJECT:" So zone names should be limited to 4 characters or

I just added 802.1Q VLAN support to redhat initscripts. And after support was ready, I tried to restart shorewall. Well it blew into pieces. Seems like shorewall can''t handle device names like: eth0.3 very properly. That''s default naming of vlan devices. eth1 is master device and 3 is id of my test vlan. So when I added to interfaces line: home eth0.3 detect seems like

The first Beta Version is available at: http://www.shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/Beta ftp://ftp.shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/Beta New features include: 1) "shorewall refresh" now reloads the traffic shaping rules (tcrules and tcstart). 2) "shorewall debug [re]start" now turns off debugging after an error occurs. This places the point of the failure near the end of the

Hello all, Name is Andrew and in desperate need of some info. Setup: - Mandrake 9.1 with three interfaces (eth0 --> WAN) C-class /28 network (with tree virtual addresses which I am DNAT-ing to the DMZ) (eth1 --> LAN) A-class 10.0.0.0/8 (eth2 --> DMZ) A-class subnet 10.1.123.0/24 - Running stock Shorewall ver: shorewall-1.3.14-3.1.91mdk Dilemma: - LAN can not access the DMZ zone

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I found out problems with dynamic add of hosts to zones. If somebody has idea how to fix it, please do tell. My head is not working on this on properly. Hope you get idea from this message. I''m trying to simplify this as much as possible to get problem clear. Problem is: Zones: vpn wlan net Interfaces: net eth0 wlan eth1 Policies: vpn all

I have /bin/ash from rh8 installation and I have following error when I tried to change using ash instead of sh with shorewall-1.4.7: + eval options=$tap0_options + options= + list_search newnotsyn + local e=newnotsyn + [ 1 -gt 1 ] + return 1 + run_user_exit newnotsyn + find_file newnotsyn + [ -n -a -f /newnotsyn ] + echo /etc/shorewall/newnotsyn + local user_exit=/etc/shorewall/newnotsyn + [

I have implemented the ability to specify ''all'' in the SOURCE and DESTINATION columns of the rules file and I''m not sure I like the result. The code is in CVS if any of you are interested in giving it a try. If you do try it, please let me know what you think. If you specify ''all'' in those columns it must not be qualified (may not be followed by

shorewall-docs-html-1.4.10a is missing following files: Banner.htm Shorewall_index_frame.htm seattle_firewall_index.htm Or there should be different index.htm in tar. There might be other missing files but that''s what I found out immidiately when I tried to check local docs. -- Tuomo Soini <tis@foobar.fi> Linux and network services +358 40 5240030 Foobar Oy

Hi, I have setup a IPSEC VPN using Openswan to connect a Draytek router to a CentOS 5.2/Shorewall 4.2.9 firewall. The VPN establishes OK but I''m getting a problem with packets from the left hand subnet getting masqueraded rather than routed down the IPSEC VPN as though they were going out onto the net. I''ve spent the last day searching Google and so far I''ve hit a

I don''t know whether this is the right place to ask, but kindly point me to an FM that I can R if it isn''t. My wife is creating lots of Kazaa traffic, and I am using rsync to create a full mirror of Red Hat''s FTP site, Aurora Linux FTP site, the LDP site, and some other stuff. Clearly, when one is moving well over 100GB over a 128 Kbps link, this is going to take a

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I found a problem with my tcstart script. First I was running system TC enabled for testing and then to stop all TC I changed TC_ENABLED=No. But I started to wonder why shorewall restart did _not_ clear TC rules after TC was disabled? So I checked firewall and found out that if TC_ENABLED=No TC_CLEAR is disabled automatically. Question is: should

All, I have been using Shorewall successfully for years on many different machines and configurations. However, I just built a new box and wanted to setup shorewall on it. I''m running SuSE Linux Enterprise Server 11 and Shorewall 4.4.8 (latest version as of this e-mail) using the RPM download. I am able to install Shorewall just fine and I''m able to setup everything except

I''m currently building a firewall for a network with 2 ISP links. Unfortunately, one of the ISP''s doesn''t support BGP yet, otherwise I would be doing load balancing at the router, instead of the firewall. I''ve been trying to find information on how to get WonderShaper working, but everything I''ve found talks about setting it up for a firewall with one

I will be resurrecting the ''check'' command in 1.4.0 Beta 3 (which may be named RC1). a) For checking the ''rules'' file, it will use the same code that processes that file for the [re]start command with the exception that ''iptables'' won''t be run. While this will make the code easier to maintain, it probably won''t do any

Just something I patch in my rpm set to make shorewall configurable. -- Tuomo Soini <tis@foobar.fi> Linux and network services +358 40 5240030 Foobar Oy <http://foobar.fi/> -------------- next part -------------- --- shorewall-2.0.2d/install.sh.orig 2004-05-28 03:17:01.000000000 +0300 +++ shorewall-2.0.2d/install.sh 2004-05-30 01:08:00.000000000 +0300 @@ -87,11 +87,20 @@ # RUNLEVELS

I have problem with my shorewall. We are now doing some stress test with a http application behind the shorewall. Firstly we send 10.000 requests to a http based application with no firewall. It can received 100% requests. But when we put shorewall in front of it then it stats to loose requests. Is there any packet limitation from shorewall all it''s about conntrack? Thanks for the reply.