similar to: failure with latest cross compiling

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 110 matches similar to: "failure with latest cross compiling"

2016 Jul 11
1
failure with latest cross compiling
Hi Roger, > > On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 6:41 PM, Roger Pack <rogerdpack2 at gmail.com> wrote: >> As a note, with the latest versions, I get this "new" failure, when >> cross compiling for windows using mingw: >> >> CCLD speexdec.exe >> speexdec.o:speexdec.c:(.text+0x4af): undefined reference to >> `_imp__waveOutGetNumDevs at 0'
2013 Apr 24
0
vorbis-psy compilation fix
This patch enables compilation with GCC 4.7.1 and --enable-shared=yes --enable-static=no --enable-vorbis-psy -------------- next part -------------- diff -r -u speex/configure.ac speex/configure.ac --- speex/configure.ac 2013-04-24 19:08:00.710564608 +0400 +++ speex/configure.ac 2013-04-24 20:04:33.589310544 +0400 @@ -204,7 +204,7 @@ AC_DEFINE([TI_C55X], , [Enable support for TI C55X DSP])
2009 Dec 30
0
[PATCH] Link libspeexdsp with libfftw3 when needed
When built with --with-fft=gpl-fftw3, libspeexdsp is not linked with libfftw3, while it uses symbols from it. This means every object linked with libspeexdsp should also be linked with libfftw3, but it is not something reflected in the pkgconfig file. Instead, link libspeexdsp with libfftw3 when --with-fft=gpl-fftw3, and remove explicit link with libfftw3 in objects build by the speex Makefile.
2016 Dec 24
1
failure at link time 3.9.1
As a note, I experimentally attempted to build 391 branch "just llvm + clang" on ubuntu the other day, and got this: [ 90%] Linking CXX executable ../../../../bin/clang ../../../../lib/libclangCodeGen.a(ObjectFilePCHContainerOperations.cpp.o): In function `(anonymous namespace)::PCHContainerGenerator::DebugTypeVisitor::VisitImportDecl(clang::ImportDecl*)':
2011 Apr 07
8
[Bug 714] New: Kernel panics in same_src()
http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=714 Summary: Kernel panics in same_src() Product: netfilter/iptables Version: linux-2.6.x Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: NAT AssignedTo: netfilter-buglog at lists.netfilter.org ReportedBy:
2008 Aug 24
1
domU lenny not working: kernel BUG at lib/radix-tree.c:474!
Trying to create a 32 bit domU is unsuccessful. I also tried some of the older builds from http://people.debian.org/~joeyh/d-i/images and found similar problems Can someone point me to an installer kernel that will work? dom0: Linux dom0test 2.6.18-6-xen-amd64 #1 SMP Tue Aug 19 06:15:09 UTC 2008 x86_64 GNU/Linux Hardware: Intel Pentium D 960 with EMT64 /etc/xen# xm create -c xm-debtest1.cfg
2018 May 10
2
Error compiling with --with-storages=
Hello, Usually I compile Dovecot with option --with-storages=maildir Starting with 2.2.30 and up to 2.2.36 RC this option cause the compilation to fail with this error: .libs/quota-imapc.o: In function `imapc_quota_refresh': quota-imapc.c:(.text+0x82d): undefined reference to `imapc_client_get_capabilities' quota-imapc.c:(.text+0x87d): undefined reference to
2007 Nov 14
10
[GE users] Apple Leopard has dtrace -- anyone used the SGE probes/scripts yet?
Hi, Chris (cc) and I try to get the SGE master monitor work with Apple Leopard dtrace. Unfortunately we are stuck with the error msg below. Anyone having an idea what could be the cause? What I can rule out as cause is function inlining for the reasons explained below. Background information on SGE master monitor implementation is under http://wiki.gridengine.info/wiki/index.php/Dtrace
2019 Aug 01
1
[PATCH] drm/nouveau: Only release VCPI slots on mode changes
Looks like a regression got introduced into nv50_mstc_atomic_check() that somehow didn't get found until now. If userspace changes crtc_state->active to false but leaves the CRTC enabled, we end up calling drm_dp_atomic_find_vcpi_slots() using the PBN calculated in asyh->dp.pbn. However, if the display is inactive we end up calculating a PBN of 0, which inadvertently causes us to have an
2004 Nov 18
3
[LLVMdev] A few beginner level questions..
1. If we run a few passes in a sequence ..is the bytecode file transformed after each pass in sequence i.e if we have a) opt -pass1 -pass2 -pass3 < in.bc > out.bc b)opt -pass1 -pass2 < in.bc > tmp.bc opt -pass3 < tmp.bc > out.bc are the above two equivalent ? what I basically want is to run my pass on an optimised bytecode , so should i optimize it and get a new bytecode
2015 Nov 09
0
ERROR_NO_SYSTEM_RESOURCES on virtio port within the Windows Guest
Hi, >From a Windows Guest , I try to read data sent by the Host , via a virtio port . ( I.e. channel device type UNIX on host side) If no data sent by Host , the blocking ReadFile() invoked within the Guest exits immediately with following error code : ERROR_NO_SYSTEM_RESOURCES 1450 (0x5AA) Insufficient system resources exist to complete the requested service. Is it the waited behavior
2018 May 10
0
Error compiling with --with-storages=
Am 10.05.2018 um 16:02 schrieb Andrea Gabellini: > Hello, > > Usually I compile Dovecot with option --with-storages=maildir > > Starting with 2.2.30 and up to 2.2.36 RC this option cause the > compilation to fail with this error: > > .libs/quota-imapc.o: In function `imapc_quota_refresh': > quota-imapc.c:(.text+0x82d): undefined reference to >
2015 Jan 07
1
[PATCH v8 34/50] vhost/net: virtio 1.0 byte swap
On Tue, 06 Jan 2015 16:55:30 -0700 Alex Williamson <alex.williamson at redhat.com> wrote: > On Mon, 2014-12-01 at 18:05 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > I had to add an explicit tag to suppress compiler warning: > > gcc isn't smart enough to notice that > > len is always initialized since function is called with size > 0. > > I'm getting a panic
2015 Jan 07
1
[PATCH v8 34/50] vhost/net: virtio 1.0 byte swap
On Tue, 06 Jan 2015 16:55:30 -0700 Alex Williamson <alex.williamson at redhat.com> wrote: > On Mon, 2014-12-01 at 18:05 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > I had to add an explicit tag to suppress compiler warning: > > gcc isn't smart enough to notice that > > len is always initialized since function is called with size > 0. > > I'm getting a panic
2014 Jan 13
0
dsync error: gz trailer has wrong CRC value
A few days ago by dovecot installation started behaving weirdly. First it was doveadm fts optimize which would fail (a thread running about that) and now it's dsync, which means my backups are not working. This all started a few days ago, which I find a little weird, because I haven't messed around with the dovecot setup in months. I've been searching the internet, but didn't find
2014 Dec 01
2
[PATCH v8 34/50] vhost/net: virtio 1.0 byte swap
I had to add an explicit tag to suppress compiler warning: gcc isn't smart enough to notice that len is always initialized since function is called with size > 0. Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck at de.ibm.com> --- drivers/vhost/net.c | 15 ++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff
2014 Dec 01
2
[PATCH v8 34/50] vhost/net: virtio 1.0 byte swap
I had to add an explicit tag to suppress compiler warning: gcc isn't smart enough to notice that len is always initialized since function is called with size > 0. Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck at de.ibm.com> --- drivers/vhost/net.c | 15 ++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff
2009 Nov 13
0
Problem building R 2.10 release
Hi, I am having problem building R 2.10, and it does not seem anyone else is having a similar problem... My system information: uname -m = x86_64 uname -r = 2.6.31-ARCH uname -s = Linux gcc (GCC) 4.4.1 icc (ICC) 11.0 20081105 The first problem I encounter seems to be with icc and wctype.h during ./configure. export CC="icc -std=c99" export CXX=icpc export OBJC="icc
2003 Nov 16
1
Bug in 2.6.0-9
Assertion failure in journal_add_journal_head() at fs/jbd/journal.c:1679 : "(((&bh->b_count)->counter) > 0) || (bh->b_page && bh->b_page->mapping)" ------------[ cut here ]------------ kernel BUG at fs/jbd/journal.c:1679! invalid operand: 0000 [#2] CPU: 0 EIP: 0060:[<c017637f>] Not tainted EFLAGS: 00010282 EIP is at
2004 Nov 18
0
[LLVMdev] A few beginner level questions..
On Wed, 2004-11-17 at 23:19, Abhijit Ray wrote: > 1. If we run a few passes in a sequence ..is the bytecode file > transformed after each pass in sequence i.e > > if we have > a) opt -pass1 -pass2 -pass3 < in.bc > out.bc > b)opt -pass1 -pass2 < in.bc > tmp.bc > opt -pass3 < tmp.bc > out.bc > > are the above two equivalent ? Yes, they're