Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "problem"
2007 Jul 14
0
file couldn't play after Speex encode and decode
The encoded speex file should, by convention, be given the '.spx'
extension rather than '.wav', but that is not the issue. What appears to
be happening is that the '.wav' extension on your named output file from
speexdec is not being recognised as '.wav' and, consequently, the file
is being written as 'raw' data without the wave file header. I am not
sure
2004 Aug 06
0
Speex test cases?
Hello,
> 2. I don't have a good source of wav data for testing. I've noticed that
> introducing bugs into speex (even gross ones like returning completely
> incorrect codebook entries) tends to, sometimes subtly, degrade quality
> instead of blowing up. Is there an existing set of source data - and
> maybe even a test harness that will do binary comparison, so I can avoid
2008 Apr 04
0
speexdec 1.2.3
Dear Jean-Marc and Peter:
Thank you both very much for your time and advice. I did not realize that Lame MP3 code has a -r option (without reading its code). I have tried the suggested command lines verbatim with the added -r option, along with other combination of option settings. I could not figure out how to eliminate the distortion in the result, like voice turning either high or low
2009 Feb 07
0
a problem
iam using speex for the first time...iam using it in real time.....in command line as:-
speexenc /dev/dsp old.spx
Encoding 8000 Hz audio using narrowband mode (mono)
when i played this encoded file old.spx in command line:-
aplay pld.spx
Playing raw data 'old.spx' : Unsigned 8 bit, Rate 8000 Hz, Mono
then i decoded this old.spx in command line:-
speexdec old.spx new.wav
Decoding 8000
2009 May 30
0
something wrong with narrowband and ultra-wideband?
I downloaded speex-1.2beta3-win32 binaries, and used the speexenc.exe and speexdec to process the file male.wav download from http://speex.org/samples
I used both the narrowband and ultra-wideband mode:
>speexenc -n --quality 3 male.wav n3.spx
Encoding 8000 Hz audio using narrowband mode (mono)
>speexdec n3.spx n3.wav
Decoding 8000 Hz audio using narrowband mode (mono)
Encoded with Speex
2011 May 04
0
speexenc/speexdec doubles file size
Juha Heinanen writes:
> any idea why size of wav file doubles when it is encoded to speex and
> back to wav:
>
> $ ls -ls testi.wav
> 40 -rw-r--r-- 1 foo foo 40674 May 4 14:38 testi.wav
>
> $ speexenc --denoise --agc --quality 10 testi.wav testi.spx
> Encoding 8000 Hz audio using narrowband mode (mono)
>
> $ ls -ls testi.spx
> 20 -rw-r--r-- 1 foo foo 16405
2004 Aug 06
0
Please 30 second to look a my code
Well, you seem to be using FRAME_SIZE but only defining frame_size.
Otherwise, the code looks OK, but it's always hard to tell. I suggest
you start from speexenc/speexdec or from the example I wrote in the
manual at: http://www.speex.org/manual/node12.html
Jean-Marc
Le ven 19/12/2003 à 05:22, Fabio a écrit :
> Hi
> i'm developing a sort of VoIP application
> for my
2004 Aug 06
0
RE: [Speex-devel] Subject: Problems with win32 port of Speex
> > I had no trouble building the ogg, vorbis and speex libraries. Also,
> > speexenc.exe built correctly. However, speexdec.exe will build but does
not
> > create output (either to soundcard or to pcm/wav) and eventually
crashes.
>
> I'm not sure I understand. In the first part, you say you have trouble
> building speexdec and here you say speexdec does build but
2011 May 04
2
speexenc/speexdec doubles file size
this is not really a development question, but i didn't find another
mailing list to ask it.
any idea why size of wav file doubles when it is encoded to speex and
back to wav:
$ ls -ls testi.wav
40 -rw-r--r-- 1 foo foo 40674 May 4 14:38 testi.wav
$ speexenc --denoise --agc --quality 10 testi.wav testi.spx
Encoding 8000 Hz audio using narrowband mode (mono)
$ ls -ls testi.spx
20
2004 Aug 06
1
speexenc/dec exit code
Hi all,
I've another trivial request: Is there any particular reason why
speexenc and speexdec return 1 on successful completion? It would be
preferable if they returned 0 unless there were errors, to be
consistent with other *nix utilities and to allow for easier
scripting (eg speexdec sample.spx && cp sample.spx somewhere)
Would anyone be against this?
TIA,
Bernard.
--
2008 Apr 01
2
speexdec 1.2.3
Dear Speex codec community:
I am working on conversion of voice files. I could not figure out how to use speexdec.exe 1.2.3 in piped mode in order to avoid the creation of the potentially large intermediate *.wav or *.pcm files. Any pointer to web or file of instruction is appreciated.
Attempt (one long command line, failed):
type d:\test.spx | "d:\speex 1.2.3\bin\speexdec.exe" - -
2006 Apr 20
3
Recommended version for production use
Hi --
I'm looking at adding Speex decoder and encoder support to the Miles Sound
System, a commercial library used by game developers on various platforms
including PCs, the Mac, and game consoles. As part of my initial
evaluation, I've gone ahead and downloaded the 1.0.4 and 1.1.1 Win32 binary
distributions and played around encoding and decoding various files with the
speexenc.exe and
2007 May 01
0
Re: Speex-dev Digest, Vol 35, Issue 24
hi,
i am using AVTransmit3.java for transmitting audio,
how can i implement JSpeex or speex for compression and encoding.
please give me some idea about this.
shankar.s
speex-dev-request@xiph.org wrote: Send Speex-dev mailing list submissions to
speex-dev@xiph.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/speex-dev
or, via email, send a
2005 Jan 04
3
different output for opt/non-opt on win32 platform
hi all,
thanks Jean for the codec.
I am new to speech coding. Am interested to implement
speex on a TI dsp, say C54. just downloaded speex v 1.1.6.
when I removed optimisation flags for win32 in libspeex.dsp,
I get a slightly different output for decoding using speexdec.exe
(debug version). no prob for speexenc.exe except for some
differences in the ogg header.
for anyone interested, i
2006 Nov 06
1
speexenc seg fault, amd64
Is there a bugzilla or similar for speex?
I'm getting core-dumps on AMD64 speex (ubuntu)
> speexenc -v
speexenc (Speex encoder) version 1.1.11.1 (compiled Dec 9 2005)
Copyright (C) 2002-2005 Jean-Marc Valin
> speexenc /tmp/d04t05.wav d04t05.spx
Encoding 16000 Hz audio using wideband (sub-band CELP) mode (mono)
Segmentation fault
> aplay /tmp/d04t05.wav
Playing WAVE
2004 Dec 15
4
"Click" at end of SPX files?
Ashhar Farhan wrote:
>
> dear Anders,
>
> the speex encoder really does not know when you are ending a wave file.
> most probably there is a one-off error in your loop that reads the wave
> file and you are incorrectly reading the end of the wave file.
Hmmm, I am using code ripped verbatim from speexenc. Are there any known
bugs of this kind in that?
> btw, it will be
2004 Aug 06
0
Re: [Speex-devel] Subject: Problems with win32 port of Speex
(replying to the new list: speex-dev@xiph.org)
> I'm having trouble building the 'speexdec' executable in the win32 port of
> Speex. I'm using MSVC++ 6.0 on both a Win2000 and a WinXP box (the error
> occurs on both machines). The sources are fresh from CVS as of today.
Can you check whether or not you have the same problem in beta 2?
> I had no trouble building the
2006 Dec 06
0
speex 1.2beta1 encoding/decoding clicking noise on WM2003
Can you post the input and output file on the web and specify what
options you're using (use speexenc/speexdec, *not* your own code).
Jean-Marc
Yanxin Cui a ?crit :
> Would it help if I scale the input wav data before encoding to spx?
> One interesting thing is if I encode the same wav file to spx(or
> decode the same spx file to wav ) on Windows platform, then there is
> no
2004 Aug 06
0
Problems with win32 port of Speex
Hi folks,
I'm having trouble building the 'speexdec' executable in the win32 port of
Speex. I'm using MSVC++ 6.0 on both a Win2000 and a WinXP box (the error
occurs on both machines). The sources are fresh from CVS as of today.
I had no trouble building the ogg, vorbis and speex libraries. Also,
speexenc.exe built correctly. However, speexdec.exe will build but does not
create
2004 Aug 06
4
Chopping off the wideband?
On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 09:06:16PM -0500, Jean-Marc Valin wrote:
> BTW, when you have something working and stable, I could include it in
> the main Speex distribution.
Hmmm, define working and stable :)
<braindump topic="speexcat">
It began as a merge between speexdec and speexenc from 1.0beta3,
with the encoding/decoding removed, and simply piped in and out from
ogg