similar to: C# Sample in speex

Hi Speex-Dev Team, Can you please give me the idea how to convert the audio bytes Array in Audio using speex codec. Let suppose I have a port where I continuously receive the bytes array and then finally I want to convert these bytes array into Proper audio in listening and speaking. Please can you provide me the sample in C# language. Waiting for your reply. Thanks, With best

Hi Speex-Dev Team, Can you please give me the idea how to convert the audio bytes Array in Audio using speex codec. Let suppose I have a port where I continuously receive the bytes array and then finally I want to convert these bytes array into Proper audio in listening and speaking. Please can you provide me the sample in C# language. Waiting for your reply. Thanks, With best

Hi Speex-Dev Team, Can you please give me the idea how to convert the audio bytes Array in Audio using speex codec. Let suppose I have a port where I continuously receive the bytes array and then finally I want to convert these bytes array into Proper audio in listening and speaking. Please can you provide me the sample in C# language. Waiting for your reply. Thanks, With best

Hi, I have two systems(a laptop and a desktop) connected with an Ethernet cable. Desktop is using the Internet through the laptop wireless LAN. Both systems have Ubuntu 11.10 with XEN 4.1.2 Hypervisor. I have compiled OpenvSwitch-1.5 on both the systems as well. In Linux Bridge mode both can ping each other. Problem: LINUX bridge is used in both systems and both can access the internet but as

Howdy all: I'm on OS-X snow leopard, and am using XCode 4.2 I'm following the FAQ to try converting c++ to c llvm-g++ -emit-llvm -c temp.cpp -o temp.bc llc -march=c temp.bc -o temp.c I'm getting the following error: llc: temp.bc: Invalid ALLOCA record Anyone knows what I should do to correct it ? Waqar -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Guys, I've a simple setup where a Solaris 8 server running Samba 3.0.4 serves out a single share. User authentication is done through Windows Active Directory servers. This has been working fine with a Windows client where the user can map the share without any problems. The user has now setup a new Windows server and is failing to map the share. I can see the following error message in the

Hi Rodolfo, [please reply to <nut-upsdev at lists.alioth.debian.org>, not nut-upsdev-owner, and if you have large attachments, upload them to a web server and post the URL. Thanks!] On Jan 29, 2014, at 7:59 AM, rodolfo at tsshara.com.br wrote: > <blazer_usb.c.txt> > Sorry, we forgot to send another file. We developed this code (blazer_usb.c.txt) so that your software is able

Hello everybody, compiled openssh git master (6f917ad) on i686 without problems, but tests fail: [...] run test multiplex.sh ... test connection multiplexing: envpass test connection multiplexing: transfer scp: failed copy /tmp/openssh-git/src/openssh/regress/data cmp: /tmp/openssh-git/src/openssh/regress/copy: No such file or directory scp: corrupted copy of

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=74195 Priority: medium Bug ID: 74195 Assignee: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org Summary: Responsivity to input with vsync on is slower after update QA Contact: xorg-team at lists.x.org Severity: normal Classification: Unclassified OS: Linux (All)

Hello, I'm writing a backend for an architecture that only has LOAD Instructions that first copy the old value of the target register in another register and after that load the provided value into the register. Example of an addition: load a, reg1; // -> copies old value of reg1 in reg2 and loads value from a into reg1 load b, reg1; // -> copies old value of reg1 in reg2 and loads

On 29 January 2014 15:53, Jim Grosbach <grosbach at apple.com> wrote: > Hi Nick, > > The main use case I’ve seen is that it makes writing generic test cases > for ‘opt’ easier in that it’s not necessary to specify a target triple on > the command line or have a data layout in the .ll/.bc file. That is, in my > experience, it’s more for convenience and perhaps historical

The LLVM Module has an optional target triple and target datalayout. Without them, an llvm::DataLayout can't be constructed with meaningful data. The benefit to making them optional is to permit optimization that would work across all possible DataLayouts, then allow us to commit to a particular one at a later point in time, thereby performing more optimization in advance. This feature is not