similar to: Question about speex license

________________________________ From: "speex-dev-request at xiph.org" <speex-dev-request at xiph.org> To: speex-dev at xiph.org Sent: Wednesday, August 7, 2013 11:43 PM Subject: Speex-dev Digest, Vol 110, Issue 1 Send Speex-dev mailing list submissions to ??? speex-dev at xiph.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit ???

2009/9/1 Barbas, Fabien <Fabien.Barbas at nuance.com>: > Hi, > > ? ? ? ?I want to stream a file encoded in speex frame by frame (like a > phone). I don't want to decode it, nor encode it. I have a speex file on > disk and need to stream it one frame at a time. Speex frame size are > dynamic (silence is compressed, VBR, etc.) so I need the speex > specification to

farhan@phonestack.com wrote: > I was browsing through Microchips' website and came upon their Speex > library. They are charging for it and looks like it is also not open > source. > http://www.embeddedstar.com/press/content/2005/6/embedded18391.html > scroll down to the paragraph about pricing. I'm aware of Microchip's closed-source port of Speex to the dsPIC. As far

Hello - We've just released a new app for Android phones that uses the Speex codec - it's called RedPhone. Our website is at www.whispersys.com. I wanted to let you know that we were using the codec, say thanks for making this valuable resource available, and check to make sure we were handling the display of the licensing in a way that the developers were happy with. Right now the

Hi, I was wondering if anyone had managed to get speex to run (nicely) on an IXP425 processor. The current version does not seem to have the necessary optimisations for the ARM v5te, just the v5 which has assembly optimisations not understood by this target. Failing that, does anyone know where I might get a reference for this model of processor? I have look on the Intel site, but I can't

On 10/1/07, Jean-Marc Valin <jean-marc.valin@usherbrooke.ca> wrote: > I'm aware of Microchip's closed-source port of Speex to the dsPIC. As > far as I know (haven't checked the details), this is perfectly legal, > even though I think it's a dumb decision for a company that's in the > business of selling chips. I say it's dumb because by not contributing

Hi, I want to stream a file encoded in speex frame by frame (like a phone). I don't want to decode it, nor encode it. I have a speex file on disk and need to stream it one frame at a time. Speex frame size are dynamic (silence is compressed, VBR, etc.) so I need the speex specification to know how to read different frame "types". I've looked at the speex manual, but it's

The whole deal of using the new BSD license for libraries like Speex's is to allow companies to release commercial source-closed applications/devices. This to allow wider spread of the formats. Unless they are using the command line tools (e.g. encoder), which are not under BSD but LGPL. In that case, they should provide the source code for all changes they make to the command line tool,

I was browsing through Microchips' website and came upon their Speex library. They are charging for it and looks like it is also not open source. http://www.embeddedstar.com/press/content/2005/6/embedded18391.html scroll down to the paragraph about pricing. - farhan

For the last couple months, Nuance has performed extensive testing on how the Opus codec performs in the speech recognition task. I'm hoping to publish a full report in the coming months, but until then all I have is a teaser. Opus performed within about 1% of the WER (Word Error Rate) of unencoded audio. This is compared to about 5% for Speex, which was the previous codec of choice. Well

> I've been watching the speex development from its inception because I > and several Tech Startup Connection members have a very important > application for this voice encoding/decoding. Further, we are quite > familiar with ACELP as implemented in G.729. As far as I know Speex > is also ACELP ... yes/no? No. Speex is CELP (Code-excited linear prediction), but not ACELP

It turns out that the distribution hierarchy is not as reliable concept as you might think. This patch removes distrofamily again. Instead of distrofamily, we will add feature tags. This patch adds 2 feature tags for Linux distributions: package_format (eg rpm/dpkg) package_management (eg rhn/yum/apt) This change is reflected in the output of virt-inspector --- inspector/virt-inspector.pl |

--- inspector/virt-inspector.pl | 7 ++++- perl/lib/Sys/Guestfs/Lib.pm | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------ 2 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) diff --git a/inspector/virt-inspector.pl b/inspector/virt-inspector.pl index 09edbae..9148a48 100755 --- a/inspector/virt-inspector.pl +++ b/inspector/virt-inspector.pl @@ -357,7 +357,9 @@ sub output_text_os print

Change distro in the output formally known as virt-inspector to reflect the actual distro. Possible values are now: fedora, rhel, centos, scientific, debian. Add new distrofamily entry which is one of: redhat, debian. Currently all distros except 'debian' are in the redhat family. This allows you to, for example, select a RHEL/CentOS/Scientific Linux specific kernel for installation

Hi all, I?ve been developing a product using glusterfs within my team. I want to know issues about license when I use glusterfs as product. Q1. What should I do when I use glusterfs which is modified by myself. Q2. I?ve developed a management and monitoring software for gluster and things for cluster system. Should I open this source codes ? Thanks in advance.

See inline... > On Mar 24, 2017, at 8:52 AM, Mario Emmenlauer <mario at emmenlauer.de> wrote: > > > Dear All, > > I've been following this mailing list for over three years now, but > its just now that I have realized that R is licensed under GPL! :-) > > I'm not a lawyer and I don't want lawyer advice, but I'd like to get > your feedback on

Hi, I chose speex initially because i had some work in VQ on speex i.e. modifying split VQ to GMM based parametric VQ and I thought If I train the GMM based VQ codebooks with audio signal and then do audio coding with speex, I probably get a better(smaller) residual signal even with speex. But I couldnt get that. I was trying to get a lossless bitstream by MUXing the speex-bitstream and the

I've never tried Skype, but I think it can be made to use wideband (16 kHz) encoding, which would explain why you say it sounds clearer. You can do the same with Speex too. As for the preprocessor, what it could give you is to remove the background noise and/or adjust the gain. Jean-Marc Le jeudi 14 avril 2005 ? 23:08 -0700, KC Lee a ?crit : > We are using Speex as our major codec for

good day. i am an undergraduate student of electronics and communications engineering and i would like to use SPEEX for my thesis, which is to create a software that will record speech in speex-compatible format for windows mobile 2003.(pocketpc devices) my pocket pc has an inherent sound recorder but i am going to make a sound recorder software specifically for speech files so that recordings

I have two questions: 1. ?I would like to enable VBR with the Speex codec for VoIP communications. Is this setting made within VoIP clients themselves or is it a setting that must be changed on the specific version of Speex (for example, via command line)? 2. If not, is there any way to create RTP packets via the Speex command line? (The goal is to view the lengths of the packets created by