similar to: PESQ calculated MoS-Values for Speex

OK. Different mailing lists are set up differently. This list is unusual because your answers only go to the person who replied to you. So if you want the other people on the listserv to see your answer, you should make sure that Speex-dev at xiph.org<mailto:Speex-dev at xiph.org> is added to the TO: field of your outgoing message. Hopefully someone else will also attempt to answer your

Jean-Marc Valin wrote: >> What commercial VOIP test products can I turn to in order to objectively >> evaluate your CODEC; in order to analyze audio streams for MOS scores and >> performance parameters? >> > > The MOS evaluation is subjective, not objective and actually involves > getting (many) real people to listen to the audio, not just buying a >

Francois Menard (Mailing List Account) wrote: > > did you try speex in wideband mode ... what bitrate? > > f. 15kbps mode. It does significantly better with a different speaker (the male does better than the female), as well. I'm considering purchasing a commercial PESQ license and wrap the PESQ software in a server application. I could then allow other folks to run PESQ

Hi, I am wondering if you may be able to help me. I have an application that has been developed by a third party and is being used in some field locations. My challenge is that I have no way of independently testing the product across the WAN at this point. All testing they have proposed required manual intervention and subjective analysis. I am not comfortable deploying the solution in this

Hello! Some time back, I added the Speex protocol to my version of VOCAL (www.vovida.org, VOIP tool). Recently, I also added PESQ (automated voice quality testing algorithm) to my tool and have been running some tests on a clean network. The source file is a woman reading some phrases meant to test various aspects of codecs... Speex has a respectable result of 3.67 Some other codecs I've

Hi, I've upgraded the driver provided by the manufacturer of the C-MOS [1] UPS, which is an argentinian company. The file I'm attaching works with nut 2.0.4, I have one C-MOS UPS and I've succesfully tested it. It would be nice to have it included in the nut codebase. [1]: http://www.c-mos.com.ar/ -- Regards, Maxy -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was

Hello all, I'm tring to retrieve a formula to calculate a MOS value from Asterisk RTCP stats... Have you got any idea how to do it? Thanks I'm reading all G.107 ITU docs to retrieve something... I'm saving the SIP RTCP stats with: [macro-hangupcall] exten => s,1,Set(CDR(userfield)=${CHANNEL(rtpqos|audio|all)}) exten => s,n,ResetCDR(vw) exten => s,n,NoCDR() So I retrieve

Is there any tool that can do LCR for Asterisk but also take into account MOS scores? Is it possible to automatically generate MOS scores on random "calls" so as to keep an updated database on a per provider, per destination, per time-of-day score? Hopefully, with that information we can create a better LCR module or script? Thanks, Daniel

Hello All, MOS and R factor are the two QoS parameters used to estimate VoIP call quality. I have found that they are calculated from other metrics like jitter, latency, packet loss,...etc. But, haven't found any formula or arithmetic rule to calculate them. Do you have an idea about their formulas or an open source that calculates them. Is it possible to interpret them from wireshark.

Ben Greear wrote: > Francois Menard (Mailing List Account) wrote: > >> >> did you try speex in wideband mode ... what bitrate? >> >> f. > > > 15kbps mode. It does significantly better with a different > speaker (the male does better than the female), as well. Most CELP based codecs do a better job with lower pitched voices, so male voices tend to sound

Overview Asterisk-powered dialer software Web Interface UNIX/Linux Cron-based Schedule Logic Open-Source Code Graphing Monitoring Stats MySQL Database for Call Records Current Features Dial by SIP or PSTN - Asterisk base capable of dialing via any medium Blast-Dialing - send multiple calls to 1 trunk for specified duration - No QoS/MOS scoring performed, designed for load testing

> What commercial VOIP test products can I turn to in order to objectively > evaluate your CODEC; in order to analyze audio streams for MOS scores and > performance parameters? The MOS evaluation is subjective, not objective and actually involves getting (many) real people to listen to the audio, not just buying a product. Of course, there's tools like PESQ that attempt to guess MOS

Hi, There is a lot of speex quality estimations. One of this comparative estimation is even available on the official site <http://speex.org/comparison/>. I'd like to present yet another one. And I thought that the best place for this presentation would be Speex-dev mailing list. I want to get feedbacks and criticisms please. If Speex authors consider to make some parts of this work

Hi Jim, First of all - thanks, turning the highpass filter off was what I needed, and the waveforms match now. But, when i did the PESQ tests again I found an interesting result : version 1.0.5 still got a slightly better average score, but the standard deviation on version 1.2 beta1 was much smaller. The cause for that is this - on some samples versions 1.0.5 and 1.2beta2 produced a single

Hi, Although this is a repost from Asterisk biz, we would like to ask if somebody may help us to develop a native Asterisk module using AQuA technology for voice quality monitoring using the same web service AQuA Meter is using. Thanks, Sevana Finland/Estonia ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Sevana Oy <sales at sevana.fi> Date: Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 7:30 PM Subject: AQuA Meter

Hi Kevin, Are you saying that the quality is good at 20 ms and bad at 10 ms, or the reverse? Also, is this speech or music? What tool, what options? In general, it helps a lot if you post the sample (input and output). Cheers, Jean-Marc On 06/03/2016 12:48 PM, Kevin Connor wrote: > Hi Opus list, > > I'm noticing a discontinuity in the quality between use of 10ms and > 20ms

Hi, I've got a problem with booting zfs-on-root FreeBSD 9.2-PRERELEASE. I'm getting: ZFS: i/o error - all block copies unavailable ZFS: can't read MOS of pool klawisz gptzfsboot: failed to mount default pool klawisz Machine is VM running under KVM on Proxmox 2.3-13. VM has 8 GB of RAM, 400 GB of local storage with SCSI Controller type: Default (lsi). I'm not sure what I did to

Hi Lin, In addition to bug 6541114... Bug ID 6541114 Synopsis GRUB/ZFS fails to load files from a default compressed (lzjb) root ... I found yet another way to get the "Error 16: Inconsistent filesystem structure" from GRUB. This time when trying to boot a Xen Dom0 from a zfs bootfs Synopsis: grub/zfs-root: cannot boot xen from a zfs root

Hi, I have been using speex version 1.0.5 on a text-to-speech program. Recently I upgraded to version 1.2beta1 and noticed that the waveform the I got after encoding and decoding on the new versions (beta1,beta2) is much more different than the original than on version 1.0.5. I also ran a PESQ comparison test on 700 voice samples and got better results in the older version (I used quality 9, and

Hello, What is meant by crude delay in PESQ quality testing? And what is its tolerant limit for good quality. rgds, Sharan