similar to: iPhone distorted audio

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 120 matches similar to: "iPhone distorted audio"

2012 Sep 30
0
Speex (in ios) really poor quality (and robotic) sound
Hi everyone, I'm trying to encode/decode with speex, when I do not, the audio is loud and clear, but when I encode/decode to test audio quality, I get a really poor audio quality and a robotic sound. Here's my init audio method : #define AUDIO_QUALITY 10 - (void) initAudio { try { //SPEEX CONFIG speex_bits_init(&bits_in);
2004 Nov 20
0
ffmpeg2theora start and end time support
For last few days I was trying to learn ffmpeg and libtheora API. In the process, I have modified ffmpeg2theora code to include support for start time and end time. ffmpeg2theora -s 60 -e 130 file.avi will produce file.ogg which will be from 60th to 130th second of input file (something like -ss and -endpos in mencoder). This is a useful feature for someone who wants to cut a part of video
2004 Dec 19
0
[patch] more ffmpeg2theora improvements
Hi, the attached patch (against current SVN) adds three new options to ffmpeg2theora: --keyint (set keyframe interval) --smoothness (set the theora_info::sharpness encoding parameter) and --noautosync (disable the new frame dropping/duplicating code). It also fixes a bug with the processing of --cropright that sometimes segfaulted. The sync adjustment code is now tuned to be more reliable. BTW
2004 Nov 20
0
ffmpeg2theora start and end time support - patch
After posting my previous mail, I realized that i should instead post a patch against HEAD. This is because v0.12 was released while I was also changing ffmpeg2theora.c from v0.11. So please use this patch instead and apply it to version at http://svn.xiph.org/trunk/ffmpeg2theora Nilesh Bansal http://www.cse.iitb.ac.in/nilesh/ -------------- next part -------------- Index: ffmpeg2theora.c
2012 May 08
0
[LLVMdev] [RFC] llvm/include/Support/OutputBuffer.h
FWIW, I'd be interested in working on the Windows implementation. I've been knee-deep in *nixes lately and wouldn't mind the refresher. :) Gordon Keiser Software Development Engineer Arxan Technologies w:+1.765.889.4756 gkeiser at arxan.com www.arxan.com<http://www.arxan.com/> From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On Behalf Of Nick
2012 May 08
1
[LLVMdev] [RFC] llvm/include/Support/OutputBuffer.h
On May 8, 2012, at 3:52 AM, Gordon Keiser wrote: > FWIW, I'd be interested in working on the Windows implementation. I've been knee-deep in *nixes lately and wouldn't mind the refresher. J Cool! Does my proposed interface make sense to implement on top of Windows APIs? -Nick > > From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On
2012 May 08
0
[LLVMdev] [RFC] llvm/include/Support/OutputBuffer.h
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 12:56 PM, Nick Kledzik <kledzik at apple.com> wrote: > For the reasons listed in my 03-May-2012 email, I am proposing a new > llvm/Support class for using in writing binary files: > > /// OutputBuffer - This interface provides simple way to create an in-memory > /// buffer which when done will be written to a file. During the lifetime > of >
2012 May 08
0
[LLVMdev] [RFC] llvm/include/Support/OutputBuffer.h
On May 8, 2012, at 4:08 PM, Nick Kledzik <kledzik at apple.com> wrote: > > On May 8, 2012, at 3:41 PM, Michael Spencer wrote: > >> On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 12:56 PM, Nick Kledzik <kledzik at apple.com> wrote: >>> For the reasons listed in my 03-May-2012 email, I am proposing a new >>> llvm/Support class for using in writing binary files: >>>
2012 May 08
3
[LLVMdev] [RFC] llvm/include/Support/OutputBuffer.h
On May 8, 2012, at 3:41 PM, Michael Spencer wrote: > On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 12:56 PM, Nick Kledzik <kledzik at apple.com> wrote: >> For the reasons listed in my 03-May-2012 email, I am proposing a new >> llvm/Support class for using in writing binary files: >> >> /// OutputBuffer - This interface provides simple way to create an in-memory >> /// buffer
2004 Nov 16
0
metadata switches for ffmpeg2theora
Jan, Here's a hacky patch to add a few commandline options for setting comment header fields in ffmpeg2theora. It's a bit big because I virtualized the global info struct in theorautils.c. In retrospect that probably wasn't necessary, but I think it's cleaner anyway. I didn't test it because I couldn't compile ffmpeg2theora, but modulo bugs it should support
2011 Jul 15
0
Writing test for CacheHelper
Hi, I''m working to patch actionpack/lib/action_view/helpers/ cache_helper.rb so that it doesn''t throw when ouput_buffer isn''t ActionView::OutputBuffer but is still html_safe. In 3-0-stable the function contains the following if: if output_buffer.is_a?(ActionView::OutputBuffer) safe_output_buffer = output_buffer.to_str fragment =
2012 May 07
4
[LLVMdev] [RFC] llvm/include/Support/OutputBuffer.h
For the reasons listed in my 03-May-2012 email, I am proposing a new llvm/Support class for using in writing binary files: /// OutputBuffer - This interface provides simple way to create an in-memory /// buffer which when done will be written to a file. During the lifetime of /// these objects, the content or existence of the specified file is undefined. /// That is, creating an OutputBuffer
2004 Aug 06
3
Error in my code
Hi I apologise if the following message is inappropriate for this list. However, I feel this is the only place where I can get some help with my problem. BOOL CALLBACK RecordProc(HRECORD hRecord, void *buffer, DWORD length, DWORD user) { try { long sent = 0; long inputOffset = 0; long outputOffset = 0; long nbBytes = 0; char *outputBuffer = NULL;
2007 Apr 25
0
echo cancellation on Blackfin DSK
Hello, I'm new on DSP and i want to implant speex echo canceller on the Blackfin DSK version of speex to work on the BF533 EZ-KIT LITE But i can perform the echo canceller to work This is my code, so if somebody can tell me where i'm wrong //----------------------------------------------------------------------------- // CallBackFunction() - Gets called by the audio pseudo-driver
2018 Mar 27
0
[pre-RFC] Data races in concurrent ThinLTO processes
On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 6:03 PM, <katya.romanova at sony.com> wrote: > Hi Steven, > > Look at my replies inline (below your comments). > > Katya. > > > > *From:* stevenwu at apple.com <stevenwu at apple.com> > *Sent:* Thursday, March 22, 2018 4:46 PM > *To:* Romanova, Katya <katya.romanova at sony.com> > *Cc:* Teresa Johnson <tejohnson at
2018 Mar 27
0
[pre-RFC] Data races in concurrent ThinLTO processes
> On Mar 26, 2018, at 6:03 PM, katya.romanova at sony.com wrote: > > Hi Steven, > Look at my replies inline (below your comments). > Katya. > > From: stevenwu at apple.com <mailto:stevenwu at apple.com> <stevenwu at apple.com <mailto:stevenwu at apple.com>> > Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2018 4:46 PM > To: Romanova, Katya <katya.romanova at sony.com
2018 Mar 27
0
[pre-RFC] Data races in concurrent ThinLTO processes
On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 7:34 PM, <katya.romanova at sony.com> wrote: > Hi Peter, > > > > Thank you for the clarification J. > > > > I’m sure you have a very good understanding of how much efforts it will > take to write a patch for legacy C LTO to implement caching the same way > it’s done in new C++ LTO API. How easy/difficult do you think it will be >
2018 Mar 27
1
[pre-RFC] Data races in concurrent ThinLTO processes
Hi Steven and Peter, I think we resolved all the misunderstanding/concerns that we had with the proposal and decided that we don’t have to implement heavy-weight synchronization solutions (such as read-write locks, etc). Lightweight solution is expected to work on MacOS and Windows (however, there might be issues with Windows supporting non-NTFS file systems). There are two options for the
2018 Mar 27
2
[pre-RFC] Data races in concurrent ThinLTO processes
Hi Peter, Thank you for the clarification ☺. I’m sure you have a very good understanding of how much efforts it will take to write a patch for legacy C LTO to implement caching the same way it’s done in new C++ LTO API. How easy/difficult do you think it will be (very roughly, in LOC)? Do you anticipate that a lot of existing legacy C LTO infrastructure will have to be rewritten? Could this also
2011 Nov 19
3
undefined method `+@'
Any idea what might be wrong? ActionView::Template::Error (undefined method `+@'' for #<ActionView::OutputBuffer:0x00000002e51580>): -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to