similar to: generic tunnel bug

Hi guys, I''m trying to setup an IPIP tunnel between a Cisco router and a firewall running Debian GNU/Linux Sarge with Shorewall 2.0.13. I''ve read and implemented the http://shorewall.net/IPIP.htm document, but I don''t understand why there should be at the same time a "tunnel" and a "tunnels" script. Shorewall still refuses to let the

Hello, I have the following situation : Server with 2 nics 1 nics connected to the internet, 1 connected to the LAN I have OpenVPN running on the system and the following setting in the tunnels file : =================================== openvpn:2000 net 62.58.0.226 openvpn:2001 net 62.58.0.226 openvpn:2002 net 62.58.0.226 =================================== All tunnels ran for weeks

I am have a shorewall firewall and freeswan ipsec running on a redhat 8.0 Linux gateway machine. I have one working tunnel defined, all works well. I am not clear how to define mutiple concurrent tunnels. I can not add further interface entries as all the tunnels come in on ipsec0, do I still have mutiple zone definitions? some of the tunnels will be dynamic roadwarriors and as such would need a

Hi everyone! First of all, sorry about my bad English and the e-mails extension. I need some help to implement a VPN connection using shorewall and openswan as IPSec Tunnel. My network map: CLIENT VPN APPLIANCE --> +++INTERNET+++ --> FIREWALL --> OPENSWAN SERVER (DMZ) I have two VPN connections with two different subnets to the other end. The two of then are correctly established.

Hi, I am new to VPN an OpenVPN with shorewal. I tryed a lot and read a bounch of howto''s but nothing helped so I came here. I want to tunnel all request to my server 141.48.XXX.XXX from my home network throu port 443. I want to do this because this is the only way I can connect to my server using ssh or ony other tool or port. On Port 80 Apache is running, so I only have the https port

Hi ! Recently i switched my internet provider, to get more speed but another braindead setup regarding public ip addresses. I now have 4 PPTP Tunnel available, of which i''m using one as the gateway ip doing masquerading to other machines in my local lan, excluding three other machines, which i would like to use 1:1 nat to get them a direct access to one of the pptp tunnels. I was

Dear list, I am having a problem with openvpn. I have the following arrangement, running two instances of openvpn on "home fw". I want to protect my WLAN in back of the home fw and that works fine. I can see "Peer connection initiated with 192.168.1.3:5000" in daemon.log on homefw. Nothing gets initiated with officefw, nor can I ping the other end of the tunnel at officefw.

Hi all Hi everyone Shorewall 3.2.6 and OpenSWAN 2.4.4-18.2 are on SLES10 machine with public fixed IP address on Internet interface. I am trying to establish IPSEC VPN tunnel to network behind D-Link DI-804HV VPN router who is on dynamic IP address. For this I am using dyndns.org alias on DI804 side. Shorewall is stopping all packets comming from DI804 whey trying to establish tunnel. Log on

Hi, I''m trying to set-up an ipsec tunnel between a Redhat9 box and a Netgear FVS318. When trying to initialise the connection - ifup ipsec0 - I get the error: RTNETLINK answers: Network is unreachable This would lead me to believe shorewall is blocking ipsec. My config is below. The output of ''shorewall status'' is attached. Any help in pointing out if I''ve

Hi all, I finally got my IPSec tunnel from my Fedora firewall system (running Shorewall 4.0.6) to a remote Draytek Router up-and-running, but I''m having difficulties directing traffic through the tunnel. From the output of "racoon -F -f racoon.conf" and the connection status page of the Draytek I can tell the tunnel is UP, but ping and traceroute requests to several hosts

On Mon, 2004-12-13 at 11:03 -0800, Tom Eastep wrote: > On Mon, 2004-12-13 at 10:45 -0800, Tom Eastep wrote: > > On Mon, 2004-12-13 at 13:43 -0500, M Lu wrote: > > > Tom, can he specify openvpn twice in the tunnel file, e.g. > > > > > > openvpn:udp:5000 > > > openvpn:udp:5001 > > > > > > I think I had the problems with that so I use

Hi Tom, I nearly completed the test and installation related to http://www.shorewall.net/PPTP.htm. However, there is no serious problem when it is operated as it is in the general companies, but there is Client Program for MS-Window that is operated only by Public IP. So I am very concerned about it. I would like to use Internet through Gateway in (B) as local computers in (A) receive Public

On 25.04.24 17:15, openssh-unix-dev-request at mindrot.org digested: > Subject: how to block brute force attacks on reverse tunnels? > From: Steve Newcomb <srn at coolheads.com> > Date: 25.04.24, 17:14 > > For many years I've been running ssh reverse tunnels on portable Linux, > OpenWRT, Android etc. hosts so they can be accessed from a server whose > IP is stable

I have a firewall running Shorewall 1.3.13-1 from rpm on a redhat 7.3 box. The box has three nics assigned to zones loc net and dmz. We also have multiple vpn links accomplished via ssh tunnels, These links all come from dynamic IP addresses with known private subnets behind them. There are basically two types of networks these vpns connect, one with access to almost everything and one with

Hi, I successfully connected quite a few servers with their associated networks using Suse 9.1/9.2 (Kernel 2.6.x) and IPSEC tunnels. But now I have to add another server that has a ADSL connection to the internet, that means it has a dynamic IP address which is likely to change every few hours, since the provider disconnects from time to time. I found a way to restart the IPSEC connection when

http://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/2.2-Beta/shorewall-2.2.0-RC1 ftp://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/2.2-Beta/shorewall-2.2.0-RC1 Problems Corrected: 1. The syntax of the add and delete command has been clarified in the help summary produced by /sbin/shorewall. New Features: 1. TCP OpenVPN tunnels are now supported using the ''openvpn'' tunnel type. OpenVPN

I have a firewall with 2 connections to the internet (eth1 and eth2) and one LAN interface. on the LAN interface, the users can connect via PPTP. those authenticating via pptp shall be masqueraded over eth2, those not authenticating should be ordinary masqueraded over eth1. as from the archives I took the configuration like in FAQ32, but this doesn''t work with the ppp+ interfaces. I

I''ve got what I think is a fairly simple home network configuration with one Linux box functioning as the firewall, VPN server, DHCP server and file/print server. I am having trouble configuring both a VPN server (PopTop) and the firewall rules for a W2K PPTP VPN client. The VPN server runs on the firewall machine and the VPN client runs on a W2K machine behind the firewall. The VPN

Tuomo Soini wrote: > You don''t happen to read shorewall-devel mailinglist ? I read it -- I just didn''t know what to make of your post and it arrived while I was on vacation. What exactly are you trying to accomplish that Shorewall isn''t doing for you now? e.g. /etc/shorewall/zones rw Roadwarriors Road Warriors /etc/shorewall/interfraces rw ipsec+

I am trying to setup openVPN 2.0 beta11 (sever/client configuration) and shorewall. I managed to get it working with out shorewall in the mix. When I start shorewall this message appears in the logs. Oct 12 13:41:03 localhost kernel: Shorewall:net2all:DROP:IN=eth0 OUT= MAC=00:04:5a:7f:92:9f:00:b0:c2:89:68:e4:08:00 SRC=69.145.71.133 DST=216.187.138.18 LEN=42 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=46 ID=11 DF