similar to: packet loss concealment algorithm in speex speech codec

Hi, I would like to know which method uses Speex to conceal the loss of packets. I've reviewed the code and haven't found anything. Thanks in advance. Iago Soto. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://westfish.xiph.org/pipermail/speex-dev/attachments/20040614/bfa135e0/attachment.htm

Dear everyone, I am current working on a project that requires me to divide an integer into two halves based on its bits and carry out multiplication and addition on the new data and combine these results to get the original result. Could someone please help with the "how to" part. Thanking you, Vivek Datir IIT Guwahati , India -------------- next part -------------- An HTML

for the bits init I am using speex_bits_set_bit_buffer and I don't use the write to or read from because the data is already in the buffer I am reading from and I am writing to the final buffer so I don't need to move arrays around. what part is the vocoder part of the decode? Thanks for your help! -Mike >>> Jean-Marc Valin <jean-marc.valin@usherbrooke.ca> 08/06/07

Hi all, I want to allocate bandwidth for ipsec interface using CBQ/tc. Suppose the conf. file is like this, DEVICE=ipsec0,10Mbit,1Mbit RATE=128Kbit WEIGHT=10Kbit PRIO=5 RULE=192.128.1.0/24 Does it work or What else options need to be taken care like ipsec packets/protocol/port # etc.? C''d anybody suggest please? regds, Srikanth. _______________________________________________ LARTC

Hi, I need to find out all the places where the value of a variable is being used. For this I have to implement reaching definitions(def-use chains). When I searched for its implementation I found Iterating over def-use & use-def chains <http://llvm.org/docs/ProgrammersManual.html#iterate_chains>. will this work for finding the places where a variable is reaching? I tried to use

Hi Duncan Sands, I frankly don't know what a variable gets converted to (SSA register or memory chunk). What I meant is, for example I1: int i, j=10; I2: scanf("%d", &j); I3: i = j + 1; Here I want to know whether the value of j in I1 reaches I3 or not. Best Regards, Srikanth Vaindam you didn't define what you mean by a variable. LLVM has virtual registers which are

Hi, I'm a developer currently using the speex codec in a VOIP application of ours.. It sounds amazing, especially at wideband.. my question is how do I force it to do a concealment? We have a low latency application, and based on the current API, I'm guessing concealment only kicks in when a packet is lost.. However, our jitter buffer knows when a packet is missing, and I'd like to

Hi all, I am developing a VoIP application and have used SPEEX for that purpose; I successfully managed to port the codec in fixed-point to an ADSP-21364 processor, and the codec works fine in narrowband, wideband and ultra-wideband mode. Currently, I have chosen, in accordance with the speex manual, a 20 ms frame size in each of these modes: in other words, the input buffer for speex was set to

Dear Samba Team, First of all Thank you for Implementing samba4 version with RSAT it was very useful in our environment.we have configured samba4 with RSAT in our college it was working for the past 5 to 6 weeks and then later we are facing the problem in accessing sharing folder i am getting error "security id structure is invalid" is there any solution for this

Hi Does anyone know where one can get hold of a G729 codec for asterisk which effectively can do packet loss concealment using Steve Kann's wonderful new Jitter buffer. The 2 versions that I know of, (digium's and the IPP one) do not perform great at PLC, especially with 4 or 5% loss. Thanks in advance. Clive

Hello Gurus, Greetings. I have been assigned some work on the development of a migration tool. The requirement is that it has to migrate the data on a UFS/VxFs filesystem to an ext2 filesystem. What are the technical apects I will have to look into to achieve the same? Is it possible to change the on-disk structure of the UFS/VxFs filesystem to an ext2 filesystem? The question may

Rowland Penny <rowlandpenny <at> googlemail.com> writes: > > On 13/01/15 11:48, srikanth <at> icat.ac.in wrote: > > Dear Samba Team, > > First of all Thank you for Implementing samba4 version > > with RSAT it was very useful in our environment.we have > > configured samba4 with RSAT in our college it was working > > for the

Hi, So I got a crash on the following code: k1=SUBMODE(lpc_enh_k1); k2=SUBMODE(lpc_enh_k2); which in the newer codebase is: bw_lpc(SUBMODE(lpc_enh_k1), st->interp_qlpc, awk1, st->lpcSize); bw_lpc(SUBMODE(lpc_enh_k2), st->interp_qlpc, awk2, st->lpcSize); I am not sure if the newer code will have the same issue but the following check is

Hi, Any body having idea to find the NIC Capacity / BW (10 / 100 Mbps) ? Whether the interface may be eth0/eth1/ppp0 or some other. Is there any related IOCTL avialable, if so just give the linux-2.4.18 file path. thanks, Srikanth. _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

Hi, The CBQ config file shud be some thing like this. DEVICE=eth0,10Mbit,1Mbit RATE=50Kbit WEIGHT=5Kbit Shall i hardcode the DEVICE BW as 10/100 Mbit or Shall i use any other tool like ethtool for getting this. ethtool gives Speed: 10Mbps If so, how about, if i use some other Interfaces other than eth0, like ppp0 or some other? C''d anybody can give a suggestion over this? thanks

Hi, I am trying to build llvm 3.4.2 on Centos 6.6. I am getting this below build error , while building the libcxx. I followed the build procedure based of http://clang.llvm.org/get_started.html. I cannot move to a higher version, Since we need to develop on CentOS 6.6 and LLVM 3.4.2 ,is the last version that supports gcc 3.4.2. Starting from LLVM 3.5.0, there has been a huge jump to gcc 4.7.0.

Hello, changing the permissions on the underlying filesystem leads to an immediate change. Hope this helps! Am 22.01.25 um 12:15 schrieb Ralph Boehme via samba: > Hi Srikanth, > > On 1/22/25 11:52 AM, ., Srikanth N S via samba wrote: >> Could you please let us know if this is an expected behavior? Or do >> we have to make any configuration changes to reflect the changes to

Hi Srikanth, On 1/22/25 11:52 AM, ., Srikanth N S via samba wrote: > Could you please let us know if this is an expected behavior? Or do > we have to make any configuration changes to reflect the changes to > share permissions immediately on the SMB clients. iirc that is just current behaviour. We call check_user_share_access() only from make_connection_snum() and never update it

Hi, I am using speex 1.2beta2 on a narrowband 16-bit, 8khz system that has a severe program space problem and will not fit speex in its normal operation. In an attempt to shrink speex I placed a breakpoint in every function and ran a decode and encode and removed the breakpoints that I hit. in the functions that had a breakpoint that I didn't hit I commented out those functions (as well as

Hi, While testing Static and Dynamic shares, we observed that any modification to an existing share, for eg changing share permission from RO to RW, does not get reflected immediately on the existing SMB Windows clients. We had to disconnect and connect the network drive corresponding to Samba share for the change in permission to get reflected. We also tried ?smbcontrol all reload-config? on