similar to: Denoise causing drain pipe effect in audio

On 06/04/2010 07:37 PM, Jean-Marc Valin wrote: > On 10-06-04 05:16 AM, Gurinder Singh wrote: > >> I have been developing an audio application using Speex. To reduce the >> background noise in the captured audio I have enabled the denoise >> feature and set the noise suppression level to 60. >> > There you go, don't do that. There's a reason

Hi Jean Thanks for the reply. We expect to use the codec in an environment where we expect very high background noise where high noise suppression will be needed. In a situation like a soccer match. Is there a way of retaining high noise suppression and still getting better audio quality. Your pointers will be of great help. Thanks, Gurinder On 6/4/10, Jean-Marc Valin <jean-marc.valin at

On Fri, 2010-06-04 at 17:28 +0530, Gurinder Singh wrote: > > Is there a way of retaining high noise suppression and still getting > better audio quality. Your pointers will be of great help. I hope people don't resent me making a point on this, as I don't actually know how the noise suppression in speex works, but I have some knowledge in the area of noise suppression. In

Actually, if you have a second microphone that captures just the noise (perhaps a directional mic pointed away from the announcer), and the sound path between that microphone and the primary microphone is linear, then JM has already done the work for you. Just use the AEC and plug the "noise" microphone into where you would normally plug in the speaker on the AEC (and delay the

On 10-06-04 08:31 AM, Henry Gomersall wrote: > I hope people don't resent me making a point on this, as I don't > actually know how the noise suppression in speex works, but I have some > knowledge in the area of noise suppression. > > In general, if you have information about the nature of the noise you > are trying to suppress, you can do much better than just assuming

Hi All I am using speex in one of my WinCE project. I have been trying to use speex to perform denoise on the captured audio packet and echo cancellation. Following behavior I have observed while using various options. I would really appreciate if you could help me with the issues I am facing. 1. Denoise: I have written the following to code to perform denoise. //To initialize speex

Hi I am trying to use the Denoise option of speex but unable to do so successfully. I would really appreciate if some one could help me and identify what exactly wrong i am doing... I am using below code to perform denoise. //Initialize speex preprocess state and set the denoise option int nEnable = 1; SpxPreprocessState = speex_preprocess_state_init(160, 8000);

Hello, when I call my conference, I see this error in my logs: ERROR: Function DENOISE not registered here is snippet from extensions.conf ... same => n,Set(CONFBRIDGE(user,announce_join_leave)=yes) same => n,Set(CONFBRIDGE(bridge,record_conference)=yes) same => n,Set(CONFBRIDGE(bridge,record_file)=/home/asterisk/file.wav) same => n,ConfBridge(1000) same =>

Hi, I just downloaded http://www.speex.org/download/speex-1.1.4.tar.gz and tried to build it but the file denoise.c seems to be missing from the archive. Can you fix this or is it better to get everything from cvs? Another question, when will a stable version of 1.1 be released. I'm interested in the preprocess features but I would also like a stable encoder/decoder :-) Best regards, Chris

On 5/26/23 01:15, Fourhundred Thecat wrote: > how do I fix this? > What do I have to do to "register" denoise ? confbridge.conf states: "Requires func_speex to be built and installed." I am guessing you have not fulfilled that requirement. Doug -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi, I don't think this is the right list but since it is the only speex related list on the XIPH list, her it goes. Flame away if you wish or, if your feeling generous, tell me what list to post on. How do you "denoise" only without compressing the file? The documentation implies it is possible. It says on page 9 of manual.pdf, "The denoiser can be used to reduce the amount

I'm having trouble with the preprocessor's noise reduction feature. The basic issue is that it simply doesn't work very well. With my laptop (whose microphone is otherwise quite capable) I routinely hear transient background noise, typing, and other "quiet" sounds leaking through to the speex stream. Even worse, the AGC feature is blowing these things up into just awful

Jean-Marc Valin wrote: > Andy Ross wrote: > > Uh, production applications almost always require squelch, no? > > Some do, some don't. In general, distinguishing between a keyboard > and a speech transient is next to impossible based only on a few ms > of speech. That is true for distinguishing it by waveform, but not by amplitude. As I mentioned, these transients are

Hi. There is denoise for preprocess during encoding. The nature of my source is unpredictable and sometimes the result is better off if I dont have denoise ON when I save my encoded speex file. So, I would like to implment a real time denoise during decoding/playback time, (instead of having the denoise result saved into speex-encoded file). Is there such denoise-preprocess function that runs

Hi, Arun and me are working on a echo-canceler module for pulseaudio build around speex. When using the preprocessor's echo filter, specifically in combination with denoise and AGC, it's unclear whether these have to run before or after the AEC. Right now we've got one instance of speex_preprocessor doing AGC and denoise running before the echo canceler; and a second for echo

Hi, I am interested in a applying wavelets as a smoothing tool for my (1-dimensional) data. I looked into wavetresh and waveslim packages but could not quite figure out an obvious way to do this after running dwt or wt functions. Would someone be able to point me in the right direction on how to denoise univariate data using one of wavelet packages available in R? Thank you very much Jane ps

Jean-Marc Valin wrote: >If you set the denoiser to "on" and the VAD to "off", what difference >does it make in CPU time? > <p>Same program, running on Athlon XP 1700+: Test 1, using VAD, but AGC, denoise off: tevek@canarsie:~/work/hms/app_conference $ time ./vad_test /tmp/demo-instruct.sw 5 reading from /tmp/demo-instruct.sw, repeating 5 times read 537760

There are many ways to implement a VAD. What you described is actually perfectly equivalent to the most trivial (and least robust) VAD algorithm. Jean-Marc Andy Ross wrote: > Ton Grandgent wrote: >> Andy Ross wrotte: >>> I wrote a trivial squelch feature* in 10 minutes that works >>> basically 100% of the time. >> Could you please explain how this differs from

> I just downloaded http://www.speex.org/download/speex-1.1.4.tar.gz and > tried to build it but the file denoise.c seems to be missing from the > archive. > Can you fix this or is it better to get everything from cvs? You're using Windows, right? The project file is simply out of date. The denoise.c file has been renamed to preprocess.c > Another question, when will a stable

Andy Ross <andy@plausible.org> wrote: > > Tom Grandgent wrote: > > Andy Ross wrote: > > > I wrote a trivial squelch feature* in 10 minutes that works > > > basically 100% of the time. > > > > Could you please explain how this differs from VAD? > > Not knowing how VAD works, I can't say for sure. But enabling > VAD wasn't catching