similar to: AEC strangest behavior

If more than one speaker receives the *same* signal, it doesn't matter the number of speakers. It only gets tricky when the speakers are playing slightly different signals (e.g. from a stereo song). Jean-Marc Quoting Greger Burman <greger at mobile-robotics.com>: > One thing I can think of is if you are using two or more speakers. If the > speakers are not at the exact same

On 2010-03-16 14:22, Josh Gargus wrote: >> If more than one speaker receives the *same* signal, it doesn't >> matter the number of speakers. It only gets tricky when the >> speakers are playing slightly different signals (e.g. from a stereo >> song). > > Does "tricky" mean that the Speex AEC won't handle such situations > well? Or just that you

On 2010-03-16 06:35, Greger Burman wrote: > Ok. Thanks J-M for clearing that up. > What if you mix up the polarity on one speaker (180 degree phase > change), would that matter? Not at all. It's still all linear. You can even apply a different equalizer to each speaker and it'll still be linear. Jean-Marc > cheers > Greger > > 2010/3/15 Jean-Marc Valin

Ok. Thanks J-M for clearing that up. What if you mix up the polarity on one speaker (180 degree phase change), would that matter? cheers Greger 2010/3/15 Jean-Marc Valin <Jean-Marc.Valin at usherbrooke.ca> > If more than one speaker receives the *same* signal, it doesn't matter the > number of speakers. It only gets tricky when the speakers are playing > slightly >

On Mar 15, 2010, at 8:46 AM, Jean-Marc Valin wrote: > If more than one speaker receives the *same* signal, it doesn't matter the > number of speakers. It only gets tricky when the speakers are playing slightly > different signals (e.g. from a stereo song). > Does "tricky" mean that the Speex AEC won't handle such situations well? Or just that you had to be

One thing I can think of is if you are using two or more speakers. If the speakers are not at the exact same distance from the mic, you will get more than one echo. AEC can not handle that. Try disconnecting all but one speaker and see if it makes any difference. cheers Greger 2010/3/15 Anton A. Shpakovsky <saa at tomsksoft.com> > Hello. > > I have the following situation. AEC

Hi Anton Thanks for the info... What if I use this function do I still need to sync the playback and capture? Assuming that the captured voice (*rec) already contains the echo which I need to cancel out... -------------------------------- void speex_echo_capture (SpeexEchoState *st, const spx_int16_t *rec, spx_int16_t *out) Parameters: st Echo canceller state rec signal

As for me - speex_echo_cancellation is a better choise. Try using it in capture thread instead of those speex_echo_capture and speex_echo_playback functions. And please, describe your problem in details. Cause the fact that you "didn get echo cancellation" doesn't mean you are doing smth wrong. Regards, Anton A. Shpakovsky -----Original Message----- From: speex-dev-bounces at

1) Everytime a participant speaks there is a echo for a short duration (maybe a word or two) but as the participant continues to speak without a any break the echo is 95% cancelled (i.e there is a feeble echo still present if observed very carefully). 2) The moment the participant stops / pauses speaking and start talking again, scenario 1 is repeated as if the echo state has been re-initialized

I usually use the cross-correlation between the speaker signal and the mic signal. It works pretty well. The problem is the you need enough data in order to get a good S/N. I compute the cross-correlation between 1.5 second data of each signals. In this way the application detection of any anomalies is quite slow. I am looking for something faster, but I fear it will be something very application

Yes. I guessed that too, however I am not sure why it keeps repeating every time the user stops / pauses and starts speaking again in a single session. I am using a laptop with standalone speakers. For echo cancellation to work one has to make sure that the ref and echo buffers are synchronized. I guess this is the most common problem. -Elston -----Original Message----- From: Anton A.

Hi Is it possible to use only the speex echo cancellation module w/o using the speex codec? Here's the scenario: 1. I have my voice recorded in PCM audio file format 2. I want to cleanup the recorded voice by removing any echo included in the audio file/buffer 3. can I just use the ff APIs? - SpeexEchoState* speex_echo_state_init() - int speex_echo_ctl() - void speex_echo_capture()

2010/5/11 Elston Sa <jose at rebaca.com>: > Is there an API in speex or have you implemented your own? I don't know if there is an API in speex for this, probably not. There is a test for AEC which does something very similar. I implemented it starting from a FFT library. It is quite easy to do. > > I am currently trying to find one. But if you could point me to one it will

First of all, thank you for your input Tim. That is very helpful. I would love to hear from other people with experience of AEC and Speex. I guess I have to split my question into to parts now. 1. Is it a fact that using the windows multimedia API (wave audio) for audio capture and playback makes it impossible to do echo cancellation with Speex AEC or other EC method due to inprecise timing? I

Hello, I've just caught a strange crash in speex_echo_state_init routine. It happened only on one WinXP machine, while on others using XP, Vista and 7 everything is fine. Crash occures in mdf.c line 434: st->spec_average = DIV32_16(SHL32(EXTEND32(st->frame_size), 15), st->sampling_rate); Got any ideas or should I provide more information of the OS? Thanks a lot!

An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/speex-dev/attachments/20090811/ad615b2a/attachment.htm -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: comunip.gif Type: image/gif Size: 1663 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/speex-dev/attachments/20090811/ad615b2a/attachment.gif

I actually forgot to mention that I'm using ultra-wideband mode, but seems like you understood that anyway. Is this true that Speex echo cancellation only performs well in narrowband mode !? I've been using 100 ms as the default tail length. I don't know what the ideal tail length would be. I have tried shorter and longer tails but it hasn't made any difference. Does

Hello? I am a new user of speex.I am currently working on speex frames and I have some questions. I am using narrowband and long tail length, and it works very well with speex test DEMO. But it is very difficult to have speaker input in perfect sync with mic input. Speex does not work at all. Any suggestion? Regards? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed...

Hey List, Firstly I am sorry for the length of this email and that you are all having too receive it but the point is that this email will now go into the archive and be indexed by Google (hopefully) and thusly, people will be able to find these links through Google. My goal is to mirror CentOS on RapidShare. "Why you fool there are loads of mirrors?" you might ask; simply for

Hey Listees, Just a quick question. I hope this isn't received incorrectly by everyone as I do mean the best for the CentOS project; I am wondering if it would be frowned upon to upload CentOS to my RapidShare account. I understand I can freely distribute CentOS but to what extent? In its simplest form I only really want to upload CentOS 5.2 to my RapidShare account for speed. I had to