Displaying 20 results from an estimated 800 matches similar to: "BUG for speex-1.2rc1"
2008 Jan 31
2
speex on embedded processor
I need to shrink speex so it will fit on an embedded processor along with some other code. The chip has only 20k of ram. I have done some work with libspeex.dsp by removing references to all modes but narrow band 8000 hz (submode 3). I used the defines: FIXED_POINT, DISABLE_FLOATING_POINT_API, DISABLE_VBR. I also removed the structures for the other submodes and the functions that they called.
2017 Feb 20
0
compiling with --enable-valgrind
Hello. I want to compile trunk speex.
./configure --prefix=/opt/speex --enable-option-checking --disable-silent-rules --disable-maintainer-mode \
--enable-shared=yes --enable-static=yes --enable-fast-install=yes --enable-dependency-tracking \
--enable-libtool-lock --enable-valgrind --enable-sse --enable-binaries --enable-vbr \
--disable-fixed-point-debug --enable-vorbis-psy --with-pic
2008 Feb 01
1
speex on embedded processor
Hi Jean-Marc,
will you include these optimizations for minimal ram usage in the main
version?
Maybe if Peter sends a Patch...
Thanks,
Alain
Jean-Marc Valin escreveu:
> Sounds like you did most of what you needed to do. Using a coverage
> analysis tool might help you remove bits of code here and there (e.g.
> unused _ctl() cases), but the main part is done. About the preprocessor,
2008 Feb 01
0
speex on embedded processor
Sounds like you did most of what you needed to do. Using a coverage
analysis tool might help you remove bits of code here and there (e.g.
unused _ctl() cases), but the main part is done. About the preprocessor,
there are some of the state variables that could instead be allocated on
the stack, but that's about as far as you can shrink things.
Cheers,
Jean-Marc
Peter Ruckle a ?crit :
> I
2007 Aug 29
2
high-pass filter issues
Hi, I am using 1.2beta2 on a C5416 doing narrowband
in the decode function I am having a problem with the execution of my
program vectoring off to random interrupts that are not used. I have
tracked down the error to the highpass function called in nb_decode
-very close to the end of the function-context:
it is called here: ln 1719 for me
if (st->highpass_enabled)
highpass(out,
2009 Apr 29
0
combine_factor to empty level
ID: T8dfe471e360ac80264c6c
Dear,
I'm using R 2.8.1 with the package reshape version 0.8.2 .
It seems that the combine_factor function has problems with combining levels to
an empty level:
#EXAMPLE WORKING
test<-sample(c(1:10),1000,replace=T)
testf<-factor(test, c(1:10), LETTERS[1:10])
table(testf,exclude=NULL)
testc<-combine_factor(testf, c(1,1,1,1,1,2,2,2,2,2))
2009 Nov 22
1
transferring SIP call: no voice
I'm trying to connect a sip call from sipgate to Asterisk A to Asterisk
B. Both are behind NAT, but port forwarded. I get the connection, but no
voice - either in or out.
I can call on SIP from A to B (and from B to A). Do it all the time.
Asterisk A receives SIP calls from Junction and Teliax.
CLI on A looks right:
== Using SIP RTP TOS bits 184
== Using SIP RTP CoS mark 5
==
2009 May 14
3
how to avoid call waiting? Or check DIALSTATUS before Dial()?
I have two internal analogue extensions off a TDM400P. If the first is
busy, I'd like to ring the second. So:
[incoming]
exten =>s,1,Answer()
exten =>s,n,Dial(${mainline},60)
exten =>s,n,ExecIf($["${DIALSTATUS}" = "BUSY"]?Dial(${secondline},30))
But it doesn't work because * first tries Call Waiting on the main line.
Here I dial out:
-- Starting
2009 Nov 16
1
1.6.0.18-rc3: SendFAX causes restart
On 1.6.0.18-rc3 using app_fax.so, spandsp-0.0.5, anytime I use SendFAX
asterisk restarts:
[Nov 15 19:00:36] VERBOSE[17013] logger.c: -- Executing
[s at fax-tx-test:1] ESC[1;36;40mNoOpESC[0;37;40m("ESC[1;35;40mSIP/nhi-rive
rside-sip-00000000ESC[0;37;40m", "ESC[1;35;40mContext
fax-tx-testESC[0;37;40m") in new stack
[Nov 15 19:00:36] VERBOSE[17013] logger.c: --
2006 Nov 24
1
Missing values for S4 slots
Using R 2.4, the following fails:
setClass("testc", representation(a="ANY"))
makeC <- function(myarg) new("testc", a=myarg)
makeC()
-> Error in initialize(value, ...) : argument "myarg" is missing,
with no default
On the other hand, this is OK:
f <- function(a) g(b=a)
g <- function(b) if(missing(b)) "missing" else "valid
2006 Jan 12
0
Problem compiling testenc.c on WinXP(newbie)
I have no problems compiling with Borland compiler (in
fact it helped uncover a couple of math issues during
run-time). I use BDS 2006. What's happening in your case
is that the Speex itself is not linked in. I suggest you
create a library out of the C sources and link it in with
your test app.
HTH,
.a
-----Original Message-----
From: speex-dev-bounces@xiph.org
2006 Jan 12
1
Problem compiling testenc.c on WinXP(newbie)
Hello,
I want to compile testenc.c with Borland C/C++ compiler, but get a lot
of errors. What's wrong?
Borland C++ 5.5.1 for Win32 Copyright (c) 1993, 2000 Borland
testenc.c:
Turbo Incremental Link 5.00 Copyright (c) 1997, 2000 Borland
Error: Unresolved external '_speex_encoder_init' referenced from
D:\SPEEX\TESTENC.OBJ
Error: Unresolved external '_speex_decoder_init'
2010 Dec 10
1
1.6.2.14 > 1.6.2.15: blind transfer works but not Xfer on aastra
Upgraded from 16.2.14 to 1.6.2.15 on Fedora 13, with aastra 9133i and 57i.
On 9133i and 57i:
#<extension># works for a blind transfer.
Xfer<extension>Xfer doesn't!
All this worked on 1.6.2.14.
Nothing useful on cli, verbose 3, DEBUG. Here extension 169 answers an
outside call, and tries to transfer it to 145 using the Xfer button:
-- SIP/169-0000009c answered
2017 May 29
0
[PATCH] Add CMake build script
Description
===========
This patch adds support of CMake meta build system, so you can generate
Unix makefiles, VS 6.0-2017 projects and many more.
Features
========
* Win32 and Linux tested
* Travis CI test added
* Generates working Visual Studio 6.0-2017 solutions
* Generates working Unix Makefile
* Supported options (<option> - <default value>):
* `ENABLE_FLOATING_POINT` - on
2006 Nov 20
0
valgrind and libusb calls
NUT developers,
just thought I'd share some notes and ideas on using valgrind against
the NUT USB drivers on Linux.
Stepping back a bit, I wanted to make sure that the tripplite_usb
driver* wasn't using any uninitialized memory, or leaking memory over
time. valgrind (specifically, the memcheck tool) runs the code in a
special dynamic translator that checks every memory access to see if
2010 Jan 28
1
Trouble in decoding speex on PC
Hi,
I am trying to develop a command line utility on PC side which will decode the encoded speex file without any header - ie. raw speex encoded data.
I downloaded the speex-1.2rc1 version and used the testenc.c under libspeex library. Just to make sure that things are working fine, encoded a .raw audio file and could get the .bit and decoded audio raw file which was validated by using a raw to
2007 Jul 17
0
write.dcf/read.dcf cycle converts missing entry to "NA" (PR#9796)
Full_Name: Bill Dunlap
Version: 2.5.0
OS: Red Hat Enterprise Linux WS release 3 (Taroon Update 6)
Submission from: (NULL) (24.17.60.30)
If you read a dcf file with read.dcf(file,fields=c("Field",...))
and the file does not contain the desired field "Field",
read.dcf puts a character NA for that entry in its output
matrix. If you then call write.dcf, passing it the output
of
2017 Jul 25
0
[Questions] About small files performance
Dear all
Recently, i did some work to test small files performance for gnfsv3
transport. Following is my scenario.
#####environment#####
==2 cluster nodes(nodeA/nodeB)==
each is equipped with E5-2650*2, 128G memory and 10GB*2 netcard
nodeA: 10.254.3.77 10.128.3.77
nodeB: 10.254.3.78 10.128.3.78
==2 stress nodes(clientA/clientB)==
each is equipped with E5-2650*2, 128G memory and 10GB*2
2004 Aug 06
1
testenc and snr calculation
I submitted a version of testenc.c to this list MONTHS ago that fixed this
problem. It uses a reconfigurable group delay. If you had given me cvs
access I could've committed the changes myself.
Anyway, the file is attached (again). Maybe this time you'll actually
notice the email.
Sorry if I seem a little short. It's just very annoying to put the time
into learning and improving a
2006 Jan 02
2
Speex decode memory usage on an Arm processor (wideband)
I am hoping to use Speex for a embedded project using Philips Arm processor
(50 mips) 512kb flash 32kb ram. I found in the manual that decode takes
about 0.5 mips so I should have enough processing power and I compiled the
lib and it seems to take less then 64K so the only issue is memory usage. I
have been testing the speex decode on windows looking at the stack usage and
how much is malloc.