Displaying 20 results from an estimated 11000 matches similar to: "streaming speex frames"
2009 Sep 08
0
streaming speex frames
2009/9/1 Barbas, Fabien <Fabien.Barbas at nuance.com>:
> Hi,
>
> ? ? ? ?I want to stream a file encoded in speex frame by frame (like a
> phone). I don't want to decode it, nor encode it. I have a speex file on
> disk and need to stream it one frame at a time. Speex frame size are
> dynamic (silence is compressed, VBR, etc.) so I need the speex
> specification to
2004 Aug 06
3
Chopping off the wideband?
On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 06:09:43PM -0500, Jean-Marc Valin wrote:
> Le mar 18/02/2003 ? 17:38, John Hayes a ?crit :
> > If I encode something in ultra-wideband, can I decode it in wideband by
> > chopping off bytes in every frame?
>
> All you have to do is use the --force-wb switch with speexdec. It will
> decode as if the file were wideband, ignoring the ultra-wideband
2006 Oct 03
3
How to get podcasters to adopt Speex?
Please consider using 16-bit 16kHz (wideband) instead. It's a huge
increase in audio quality and the bitrate is still very low, especially
if you take advantage of Speex features such as VBR.
8kHz seems totally inappropriate to me for desktop streaming audio, let
alone 8-bit samples. Or perhaps your recording equipment is an original
Sound Blaster from 1989? (Even that could record at
2006 Oct 02
4
How to get podcasters to adopt Speex?
I would love to see podcasters adopt the Speex format to deliver clear
speech audio at wideband or ultra-wideband formats. However, podcasters
want something that can easily play on Windows, Macs, and even Linux web
browsers. The Speex website has some nice audio demos, but it doesn't
actually offer any HTML embedded samples using actual Speex format. Would
there be a way to do this with
2011 May 04
2
speexenc/speexdec doubles file size
this is not really a development question, but i didn't find another
mailing list to ask it.
any idea why size of wav file doubles when it is encoded to speex and
back to wav:
$ ls -ls testi.wav
40 -rw-r--r-- 1 foo foo 40674 May 4 14:38 testi.wav
$ speexenc --denoise --agc --quality 10 testi.wav testi.spx
Encoding 8000 Hz audio using narrowband mode (mono)
$ ls -ls testi.spx
20
2008 Apr 01
2
speexdec 1.2.3
Dear Speex codec community:
I am working on conversion of voice files. I could not figure out how to use speexdec.exe 1.2.3 in piped mode in order to avoid the creation of the potentially large intermediate *.wav or *.pcm files. Any pointer to web or file of instruction is appreciated.
Attempt (one long command line, failed):
type d:\test.spx | "d:\speex 1.2.3\bin\speexdec.exe" - -
2006 Oct 03
2
How to get podcasters to adopt Speex?
This is a really good point, and definitely a recurring theme on this
mailing list. :) I wonder, what are some better options for handling
this issue, other than to keep saying "just use 8/16/32kHz"?
- Extend Speex to support other sample rates (seems unlikely..?)
- Integrate a resampling algorithm into libspeex
- Maintain a list of recommended resampling libraries that work well
2006 Aug 31
1
serving speex without a server
On my personal web pages hosted by my ISP I have a collection of speex files
with names ending, as usual, in '.spx'. My ISP does not provide for scripting
or CGI but thanks to the "Home-Brew Streaming" idea of Dr Tak Auyeng,
www.drtak.org/teaches/ARC/speex/, my friends with Windows XP can listen to
such a recording without the need for a prior download of the whole file
and
2005 Sep 27
4
Speex ver 1.1.10 decoder problem
Hi,
I just started using speex recently and I've been
having problem with Speex ver. 1.1.10 decoder. I used
Speex to encode a wav file to spx then decode it back
to wav file to see the voice quality that results from
different speex options. Somehow, I couldn't get the
original wav file back. I used both Speex ver 1.1.6
and ver 1.1.10 to both encode and decode, despite the
same output
2004 Dec 15
4
"Click" at end of SPX files?
Ashhar Farhan wrote:
>
> dear Anders,
>
> the speex encoder really does not know when you are ending a wave file.
> most probably there is a one-off error in your loop that reads the wave
> file and you are incorrectly reading the end of the wave file.
Hmmm, I am using code ripped verbatim from speexenc. Are there any known
bugs of this kind in that?
> btw, it will be
2008 Apr 04
2
speexdec 1.2.3
On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 12:19 AM, Jean-Marc Valin
<jean-marc.valin at usherbrooke.ca> wrote:
> Jahn, Ray (R.) a ?crit :
>
> > Dear Speex codec community:
> >
> > I am working on conversion of voice files. I could not figure out how to use speexdec.exe 1.2.3 in piped mode in order to avoid the creation of the potentially large intermediate *.wav or *.pcm files. Any
2004 Dec 14
4
"Click" at end of SPX files?
Hi,
I am experiencing some unfortunate problems when encoding WAV files to
spx using version 1.0.4. A "click" which is not present in the original
WAV file is added to the end of the spx file.
Is this a known problem, and if so, which version of the encoder should
I switch to... and if I have to switch the encoder, will I also have to
switch the version of the decoder?
Sincerely,
2004 Aug 06
3
Speex wishlist
Hello Bernard,
Friday, December 13, 2002, 7:22:54 AM, you wrote:
Bernard> I've one small request - an option on speexenc that allows you to
Bernard> specify a speex file to append to, allowing you to concatenate
Bernard> streams without losing quality by decoding & encoding. Ideally, it
Bernard> would:
But you can `cat speex1.ogg speex2.ogg> unionspeex.og` and still have
2007 Apr 30
2
problem decoding file
Hello,
I encode a file with speex so i get a .spx file
but i want to decode the same file
i get only one second of my file and nothing
Some idea why?
Thanks
Damien
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/speex-dev/attachments/20070430/d5a95090/attachment.html
2005 Sep 27
2
Speex ver 1.1.10 decoder problem
OK, that was a stupid error in the le_int prototype. It's fixed in svn
now.
Jean-Marc
Le mercredi 28 septembre 2005 ? 11:53 +1000, Jean-Marc Valin a ?crit :
> OK, it seems like I screwed up the wav header code between 1.1.8 and
> 1.1.9. Everything seems fine (playing to soundcard also works), except
> that the length reported for the wav is too short, which is why it stops
>
2005 Jul 06
3
click at end of playback
Skipped content of type multipart/alternative-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: good.wav
Type: audio/wav
Size: 7430 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/speex-dev/attachments/20050706/a77cade6/good-0001.bin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: bad.wav
Type: audio/wav
Size:
2004 Sep 14
2
white noise problem when using -DFIXED_POINT
Jean-Marc Valin wrote:
> On mar, 2004-09-14 at 16:31 -0700, wrote:
>
>>Hi there. We're trying to build a speex decoder for Palm OS (i.e. ARM7).
>>
>>No major problems porting thus far, but when compiling the speex modules with -DFIXED_POINT all the silent parts of the output are replaced with what sounds like high-power white noise. The spoken parts sound great, but
2005 Oct 12
2
help using libspeex in win32
Hi all,
i'm going to try to create an app using libspeex (Speex 1.1.10) and Visual
Studio and just have a few questions.
First, what's the difference between libspeex and libspeex_dynamic? Do I
need to include both projects in my new workspace?
Next, how do I enable fixed_point using libspeex? Am I correct in assuming
that an ARM processor would be able to record speech as speex files
2005 Nov 10
3
Speex client?
Hello,
On the announcement page for Icecast 2.3 it mentions
"Streaming support for ogg speex, ogg flac, ogg midi".
I've googled around and not found any free clients that
support streaming speex. I looked at svn for libshout2 and
it doesn't seem to support speex and skimming through
the list archives I only see mention of speex last February,
which seemed to indicate it would
2009 Apr 10
1
Speex .spx bitstream format
Dear experts,
I am trying to understand the structure of the Speex .spx file, so I can
packetize each frame in one packet for example, and in the receiving end,
I can decode a file that has all the received frames (some of them may
lost).
I tried to figure out what is the delimiter used to separate the frames
but I could not so far. I also tried to deleted some data from the .spx
file or change