similar to: Hi, I've got 2 problems about Speex

Hi Folks, I am having trouble using speex_echo_cancel. As a starting point, I am using the testecho.c source code. I compiled the 1.2beta1 version. I have not tried any other versions of speex. The document says that the order of arguments to Speex_echo_cancel is (echo_state, input_frame, echo_frame, output_frame, residue) where "input_frame" is as captured from mic and

Can you first try the svn version (or apply https://trac.xiph.org/changeset/11882). As I mentioned in a previous email, there's a bad bug in the 1.2beta1 echo canceller. Jean-Marc Coffey, Michael a ?crit : > Hi Folks, > > I am having trouble using speex_echo_cancel. As a starting point, I am > using the testecho.c source code. I compiled the 1.2beta1 version. I > have not

Hi Jean-Marc, Thanks for the suggesting. I tried the test wtih my recording file offline through the testecho. I got the same result(no prepocessor echo suppression) as my recording file for that live call. Basically I don't see the difference between input_frame and output_frame. As I mentioned in my original post, the echo return loss is about 20db. I guess the echo cancelleris not really

All, Wonder why all my posts has no line breaker when it displayed the forum... I used Hotmail(Windows Live Mail) with FireFox 2.0. I am posting this msg with IE 7.0 and see if it make any difference. Anybody experienced the same issue and how to workaround it? Thanks a lot! Regards, William From: espzzh@hotmail.comTo: jean-marc.valin@usherbrooke.caCC: speex-dev@xiph.orgSubject: RE:

Terrific! The patch fixes my problem quite decisively. I will want to use this with a 16K sample rate. Is it expected to work well with just another slight patch, or will we need to modify it more deeply? Also, are there any tunable parameters besides tail length? I am wondering about the aggressiveness of adaptation and I know you are an expert in that area. Thanks so much, Michael

It seems like the firefox 2.0 not quite works with hotmail... I am reposting my message again with IE for easy readability. Sorry about mess. Hi Jean-Marc, Thanks for the suggesting. I tried the test wtih my recording file offline through the testecho. I got the same result(no prepocessor echo suppression) as my recording file for that live call. Basically I don't see the difference

Hello, i'm adding echo cancellation to my voip application, but when i call speex_echo_capture() or speex_echo_playback() causes an assertion failed, it seens that there is a delete in any where. i've encapsulated echo canceller in a class that storage the state and simply call the functions: void EchoCanceller::Playback(short *echo_frame) { speex_echo_playback(echo_state,

Hello all, I am trying out the echo cancellation of Speex (1.2beta2) on Windows XP. I use the Windows Media API (i.e. waveInOpen, waveOutOpen etc) for playback and capture, but I cannot make echo cancellation works in my use case. Here is a description of what I tried: (the sound is in 8kHz and 16 bits per sample, the frame size is 240, tail_length is long enough to cover the far end to near end

Hello, Need some help using the speex_echo_cancel. I've read the documentation about the speex_echo_cancellation function: speex_echo_cancellation(echo_state, input_frame, echo_frame, output_frame); (in) echo_state => speex internal state. (in) input_frame => audio captured by mic. (in) echo_frame => the signal that was played in the speaker. (out) output_frame => the

Thank you for you quick reply, Jean-Marc. I have just used a human voice to replace the sine wave, but the result is like a broken voice after tens of seconds. Do you have some sample voice in .sw that I can test with? I want to have one set or a few sets of sample voice that work for my understanding and debugging. This is the output from echo_diagnostic.m in my human voice test: Far end to

Hi, I am new to speex so please redirect me to some links if the question is repetative. Just for testing the echo canceller performance, I have added mdf,fftwrap,misc,kiss_fftr,kiss_fft source files to my project. Now In my multithread application when I receive packets from mice, I calls speex_echo_capture(echo_state, input_frame, output_frame,Youtput_frame) with input_frame as

Hi Jean Marc, We are running the speex echo canceller code on a Windows Mobile smartphone using a TI OMAP 201MHz 850. We are making voip calls and audio is working without echo canceller code. Simply adding the following 2 functions whether the echo cancellation is wired in (ie we use the output frame ) or not performance becomes terrible. Note 2 separate threads are used to handle audio.

Hi All, I am working on my master project to port the Speex Acousic Canceller to FPGA. But I am not able to get a satisfied result in its performance whenI integrated it to a SIP softphone as my first step. The SIP softphone calls to a PSTN gateway and lands to my land line phone. I can hear the echo of my every word while I talks on the land line phone. I am using G.711 codec, frame_size 80

_____ From: Mohammed Sulaiman [mailto:mhh.sulaiman@talk21.com] Sent: Monday, February 11, 2008 12:53 AM To: Dennis Liu Subject: RE: [Speex-dev] Echo Canceller on Windows Mobile Hi, thanks. One question did you use these 2 functions speex_echo_playback speex_echo_capture No, I didn't use them. I use my own code to buffer microphone and speaker data. or do you have your audio in

Hi all, I have been trying to impelement echo cancellation on STM32F4 Discovery board (having ARM based uC).In my project, I simply initialized the echo_state by speex_echo_state_init() by using frame_size 160, filter_length 800 (at 8kHz Sampling rate.) Then, I simply used speex_echo_cancellation() function in where i am getting sound. However, I have recently realised that output_frame has been

-------Original Message------- From: Eid Date: 10/09/05 14:07:44 To: speex-dev@xiph.org Subject: problem in encoder/decoder hi all, I'm developing an app to broadcast voice over web. i tried to use speex and download ver 1.04 documentation and use it to develop encoding and decoding but after decoding voice is damaged i attach my encode/decode function. BOOL

Hi: By 'no success', I mean result gets worse in terms that, there comes in a shrill noise with high gain and also *no* attenuation of the echo. I am trying to validate the DC offset part. But can you please feed some light on how does the DC offset matter for AEC. As I have already mentioned, I tried adding silence (from 2 ms to 10 ms) in the start of the reference signal. This is for

Hello all. A few questions on using speex's echo cancellation, for clarifying: 1) I assume that the echo_frame in this method: speex_echo_playback(echo_state, echo_frame) is just raw "pcm_s16le" type bits/data? I'm a bit new to all this... 2) I assume from this thread: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/speex-dev/2009-March/007151.html that speex_echo_playback and

Hello all, I am attempting to integrate the AEC algorithm from Speex into an RTP-based voice-over-IP application. The application is supposed to operate on a TI C6412-based board, using Code Composer Studio for development. Everything seems to be working, but the problem is that there is no discernible difference in the output, whether the echo cancel function is called or not. Let me first

/input_frame/ is a /(float *)/ pointing to the beginning of a speech frame What is the range on the floats in the input_frame that speex_encode() needs? The library that I'm using to get the sound gives me floats that are between -1.0 and +1.0. I was assuming that this is also the case for speex, but I don't see it documented. I'm thinking now that maybe this is not the case for