similar to: Speex DSP porting

Eric Christopher wrote: > On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 11:39 AM, Jonathan Roelofs > <jonathan at codesourcery.com> wrote: >> >> On 7/9/14, 12:33 PM, Eric Christopher wrote: >>> Any reason why you deleted code that isn't related? >>> >>> -eric >>> >>>> - enum SubArchType { >>>> - NoSubArch, >>>> -

Hello LLVMdev!! Yesterday I posted a patch request to the llvm-commits list requesting that someone could apply a patch to Triple.h and Triple.cpp for me. I didn't get any response so I wondered whether I should have posted to this list instead. My story is as follows: we are trying to get lldb/llvm support for CSRs range of Kalimba DSPs. Eventually we are planning to hire someone to

Hi All, Wondering if you or you know some one has done the porting from Opus C reference design to the Assembly of CSR Kalimba DSP? We are working porting and would like to ask more people ( consultant) to join the effort. Thanks, Z -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/opus/attachments/20150901/6ba11a06/attachment.htm

On 7/9/14, 12:33 PM, Eric Christopher wrote: > Any reason why you deleted code that isn't related? > > -eric > >> - enum SubArchType { >> - NoSubArch, >> - >> - ARMSubArch_v8, >> - ARMSubArch_v7, >> - ARMSubArch_v7em, >> - ARMSubArch_v7m, >> - ARMSubArch_v7s, >> - ARMSubArch_v6, >> -

Hi, We have some DSP architectures (kalimba) which have 24-bits as their "minimum addressable unit". So this means that the sizeof a char (and an int and a short for that matter) is 24-bits. I quickly read the posted link WritingAnLLVMBackend.html but did not see an obvious answer to the following question: Is it possible to write a backend that faithfully represents these

Hello;I just came across NUT, testing FreeNAS/FreeBSD. I?m running at home a APC UPS connected to another computer, running apcupsd. I found out that NUT didn't talk by default to apcupsd, and there was a driver created relatively recently (apcupsd-ups), which filled in that gap. The version I found on my FreeBSD/FreeNAS system seems to imply that there is more to come to that driver (0.04)

Hi Johnny, Thanks for this - particularly the tip about cfe-dev. I'm currently trying to coerce lldb to debug these type of architectures (our current toolchain already outputs good dwarf info). However, I'm struggling since lldb has just assumes that the size of a byte is universally 8-bits. At some stage, I *think* at some stage we'd like to derive a compiler, from the "same

kmemdup is introduced to duplicate a region of memory in a neat way. Rather than kmalloc/kzalloc + memcpy, which the programmer needs to write the size twice (sometimes lead to mistakes), kmemdup improves readability, leads to smaller code and also reduce the chances of mistakes. Suggestion to use kmemdup rather than using kmalloc/kzalloc + memcpy. Signed-off-by: Fuqian Huang <huangfq.daxian

kmemdup is introduced to duplicate a region of memory in a neat way. Rather than kmalloc/kzalloc + memcpy, which the programmer needs to write the size twice (sometimes lead to mistakes), kmemdup improves readability, leads to smaller code and also reduce the chances of mistakes. Suggestion to use kmemdup rather than using kmalloc/kzalloc + memcpy. Signed-off-by: Fuqian Huang <huangfq.daxian

Hi Patrik, Thanks for this note. It's encouraging to read there has been some provision made for non-8-bit bytes. I'm not a compiler/backend expert, (although maybe I'll need to be soon!), so I won't look at the patches right now, however may at some stage in the future myself or colleague may request these patches from yourself. Yes, our 24-bit architectures have non-power-of-2

Tried your fixed_generic.h change but that didn't help. Andy ----- Original Message ---- From: Andy Ngo <ndno72-speex@yahoo.com> To: Jean-Marc Valin <jean-marc.valin@usherbrooke.ca> Cc: speex-dev@xiph.org Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2007 4:13:35 PM Subject: Re: [Speex-dev] 4kbps sounds robotic on TMS320C64 Jean-Marc, Yes, fixed-point is enabled (#define FIXED_POINT in

Hi, I'm currently working on the TI DaVinci processor, which has an ARM926 processor and a TMS320C64+ DSP in it. I have been using Speex 6kbps (narrowband, quality=2, complexity=1, perceptual_enh=0) on the DSP C64+ side without any issues; the voice sounds very good for such a low bandwidth requirement. However, recently, I tried out the 4kbps mode (changing quality to 1) on the DSP and it

I wan to share internet to these 12 PCs. But my traffic control is not working. I''m using IP Masquerading to route internet to the LAN eth0 - LAN interface eth1 - Internet interface this is my firs htb script: #!/bin/bash tc qdisc del dev eth1 root handle 1: tc qdisc add dev eth1 root handle 1: htb default 30 tc class add dev eth1 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 25kbps ceil 48kbps #tc

While I've already posted reviews for the initial patches for this (see http://reviews.llvm.org/D8506 and http://reviews.llvm.org/D8599), the grapevine suggests I should post a lengthier description of my intent for the "debugger target." The idea was prompted by a suggestion from Eric Christopher, and I'm running with it. Various bits of the DWARF we produce are conditional on

How does LLVM generate machine code for different architectures? For example, the machine code for x86 and amd will vary. How does LLVM convert its IR to machine code for different architectures.Can you please explain the approach? Is it just write two different programs for two different architectures and pass a flag to the compiler based on which machine code you want to generate? Thanks a lot

Thanks Jim, that's understood. When I say AMBE isn't working well, I only mean from the audience acceptance point of view. Technically it is fine. It is exactly doing the job we had expected. It's the long standing wish that everyone wants... More for less. We are just seeking a bit of magic that just may not be there. Ideally finding a codec that can perform

Thanks for the reply. We are currently using AMBE (4Kbps) for our Traffic/Weather Channels. If you have ever had a chance to hear the service, you will know that AMBE does not do us well. I understand that 2Kbps is low quality, but any poorer than AMBE? If can get a decent quality for other low bandwidth talk channels, such as about 10-16Kbps and have it sound rather clean, then I would be

I tried to compress 160 samples of random garbage (range 0-500.f) at 4kbps and got a crash in nb_encode -> forced_pitch_quant because start was -858993460 (== ol_pitch). -- Daniel, Epic Games Inc. --- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/ To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'speex-dev-request@xiph.org'

Hello Everyone, i''m having problem in limiting bandwith on my external interface in the server. i''m having a network here which is online via a linux server with cbq compiled in kernel. i''m having eth0 as internal network card, eth 1 as external network card my internet bandwith line is 8kbps on eth1 i want to limit this 8kbps to 4kbps at eth1 and no shaping on

Hi all, I committed a first cut at blockless Givens/Whens/Thens to RSpec''s trunk: cd /path/to/rspec/project svn up cd rspec bin/spec examples/story/calculator.rb Take a look at examples/story/calculator.rb to see what''s going on. Needs docs!!!! Thoughts welcome. I''ve also got a cut at the plain text parser checked in, but it''s not hooked up to anything