similar to: Jitter Buffer issues

** NOT WORKING ** This patch shows how to integrate libnbd and the glib main loop. Posted mainly as a point of discussion as it doesn't quite work yet. Rich.

There was a theoretic race in this example: If the server was very fast at handling commands then it's possible that in a call such as: cookie = nbd_aio_pread_callback (..., callback, ...); buffers[i].cookie = cookie; nbd_aio_pread_callback finished and calls the callback before returning. buffers[i].cookie would therefore not be set, but the callback() function was checking the list of

On 7/15/19 1:38 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > --- > .gitignore | 1 + > README | 2 + > configure.ac | 9 + > examples/Makefile.am | 22 ++ > examples/glib-main-loop.c | 501 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 5 files changed, 535 insertions(+) > Rough review (since I've never used a glib main loop

--- .gitignore | 1 + README | 2 + configure.ac | 9 + examples/Makefile.am | 22 ++ examples/glib-main-loop.c | 501 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 5 files changed, 535 insertions(+) diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore index edbf941..79b95b5 100644 --- a/.gitignore +++ b/.gitignore @@ -41,6 +41,7 @@ Makefile.in

--- .gitignore | 1 + README | 2 + configure.ac | 9 + examples/Makefile.am | 22 ++ examples/glib-main-loop.c | 511 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 5 files changed, 545 insertions(+) diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore index ce02aef..9a8ba37 100644 --- a/.gitignore +++ b/.gitignore @@ -41,6 +41,7 @@ Makefile.in

Previously discussed here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2019-July/msg00213.html It turns out that deferring callbacks is a PITA. (It would be a bit easier if C has closures.) However by rewriting the example we can avoid the need to use the cookie at all and make it run a bit more efficiently, so let's do that instead. Rich.

This is working now, and incorporates all of the changes in Eric's review, *except* that it still doesn't retire commands (although this seems to make no obvious difference, except possibly a performance and memory impact). Rich.

always use the 2.6 variants and fix up for 2.4 under the hood Index: src/journal.c =================================================================== --- src/journal.c (revision 1156) +++ src/journal.c (working copy) @@ -105,9 +105,17 @@ return status; } -#else -#define ocfs_journal_start journal_start -#define ocfs_journal_stop journal_stop + +#define journal_start(journal, nblocks) \ +

Hi, I am using speex 1.2beta2 on a 24bit DSP that has a severe program and data space limitations. I am only interested in the speex decoder for 11kbps narrowband implementation. I am using the following parameters and structures 160, /*frameSize*/ 40, /*subframeSize*/ 10, /*lpcSize*/ 17, /*pitchStart*/ 144, /*pitchEnd*/ /* 11 kbps medium bit-rate

I was noticing mainly sign differences amoung the solutions to QR decomposition. For example R: > x <- matrix(c(12,-51,4,6,167,-68,-4,24,-41),nrow=3,byrow=T) > x [,1] [,2] [,3] [1,] 12 -51 4 [2,] 6 167 -68 [3,] -4 24 -41 > r <- qr(x) > r$qr [,1] [,2] [,3] [1,] -14.0000000 -21.0000000 14 [2,] 0.4285714 -175.0000000 70 [3,]

*(note*: This is an R community question, not a statistical nor coding question. Since this is my first time writing such a post, I hope no one will take offence of it.) Hello all, I will be attending useR 2009 next week, and was wondering if there are any of you who are *bloggers *intending to participate and report on useR 2009? If so - I would love to know your blogs URL so as to follow you.

I've never tried Speex on a 24-bit DSP, but I would suggest actually leaving the code (nearly) as-is. The scaling factors actually should not change because I'm using integer multiplications, not fractional multiplications. So what should happen is that the top 8 bits or 24-bit values and the top 16-bit of 48-bit values will be unused (filled with sign bits). There may be a few cases where

Hi, I''m looking into write scaffold generators that will, amoung other things, scaffold active record associations (eg. generate select boxes for belongs_to where you can choose a parent object) for quicker prototyping. But... My question is: Is there anyway of finding out what associations exist from examining the lodel classes themselves or indeed any other way of finding out this

The TargetFrameInfo, amoung other things, specifies "local area offset" -- which, as comment say, is: the offset of the local area from the stack pointer on entrance to a function. The question is -- what's local area? Is this the first stack location which can be used by function for allocating its own variables? - Volodya

The message waiting options seem to be geared for a normal office environment where there is a one-to-one relationship between a user and a phone/mailbox. I want to have a mailbox that is shared amoung a number of people and want the message waiting light to turn on on multiple phones. I can direct the voice mail to the common mail box. I can direct the individual users to the common mail

hi fyi, it seems redhat has just pushed RHEL 5.7 out. I see amoung others: kernel-2.6.18-274.el5.x86_64.rpm redhat-release-5Server-5.7.0.3.x86_64.rpm Rainer

Greetings list, Some time ago (probably about a year ago now) we disabled IAX jitter buffering on all our boxes because it was causing issues in a mixed 1.0 and 1.2 environment. One thing I've noticed over the last few months as more and more clients have moved from the 512k/1mb/2mb ADSL connections they were using onto "up to 8mb" connections is that whilst overall throughput is a

Hello, R 4.0.2 on Ubuntu 20.04, sessionInfo at end. This came up in r-help, I'm answering to the OP and also posting to r-devel since I believe it is more appropriate there. I can confirm this. The original instructions are the first and the last, but even with smaller numbers the error shows up. set.seed(2020) jitter(c(1,2,10^4)) # desired behaviour #[1] 1.058761 1.957690

Hey everyone -- Is there a way to refer to the server with the tftpboot images so that when a client is booting diskless, it can mount an nfs directory to that tftp server? That is to say that I have a tftp server on 192.168.0.244. The usr directory is set to be shared amoung the diskless clients via nfs. In the root image, I have /etc/fstab set to something like: blah blah

Please consider this: <Manifest xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" > <!-- eName : name of the element. eValue : value of the element. --> <OutputFilePath>./XYZ</OutputFilePath> <FilesList> <File> <FileTypeId>10</FileTypeId>