similar to: sysctl errors

If I execute these via command line, will they persist after a reboot? Or, should I be putting these into a file like /etc/sysctl.conf? --------------snip-------------- /sbin/sysctl -w net.ipv4.tcp_max_syn_backlog=2048 /sbin/sysctl -w net.ipv4.tcp_fin_timeout=30 /sbin/sysctl -w net.ipv4.tcp_keepalive_intvl=10 /sbin/sysctl -w net.ipv4.tcp_keepalive_probes=7 /sbin/sysctl -w

I've been experiencing some intermittent problems accessing at NetApp server via NFS and automount. I'm running CentOS 5.2 (fully updated) on all my servers and workstations. Usually, everything is working just fine, when suddenly we get the following error: /bin/sh: /home/epd/srcref/swtools/Crontabs/ run_release_requests.sh: Permission denied This is actually an email from

Currently I'm running CentOS 4.4 on a Dell Poweredge 850 with an Intel Pro/1000 Quad-port adapter. I seem to be able to only achieve 80% utilization on the adapter, while on the same box running Fedora Core 5 I was able to reach 99% utilization. I am using iSCSI Enterprise Target as my application and I am using the nullio feature, it just discards any write and sends back random data for

Hi list (and happy new year), I'm experiencing some troubles using Samba (4.1.17 debian version) over VPN. Basically we've following setup : PC === LAN ===> VPN (WAN) ==== LAN ===> Samba file Server Copying big (say > 1MiB) files from PC to Samba file server almost always ends up with a NT_STATUS_IO_TIMEOUT error (or "a network error occured" if trying to copy from

Sysctl Values ------------------------------------------- net.core.rmem_max = 16777216 net.core.wmem_max = 16777216 net.ipv4.tcp_rmem = 4096 87380 16777216 net.ipv4.tcp_wmem = 4096 65536 16777216 net.ipv4.tcp_window_scaling = 1 # vm.max-readahead = ? # vm.min-readahead = ? # HW Controler Off # max-readahead = 1024 # min-readahead = 256 # Memory over-commit # vm.overcommit_memory=2 # Memory to

I have a beefy machine (Intel dual-quad core, 16GB memory 2 x GigE) I have loaded RHEL5.1-xen on the hardware and have created two logical systems: 4 cpus, 7.5 GB memory 1 x Gige Following RHEL guidelines, I have it set up so that eth0->xenbr0 and eth1->xenbr1 Each of the two RHEL5.1 guests uses one of the interfaces and this is verified at the switch by seeing the unique MAC addresses.

Hi I was wondering if you ever got better performance out of your Gigabit/IDE/Fc2? I am facing a similar situation. I am running FC2 with Samba 3.x My problem lies in not that I am limited to 10 MBytes per second sustained. I think it's related to this pdflush and how it's buffers are setup. (I have been doing some research and before 2.6 kernels bdflush was the method that was used and

Hi all, I order to reach maximum performance on my centos kvm hosts I have use these params: - On /etc/grub.conf: kernel /vmlinuz-2.6.18-164.11.1.el5 ro root=LABEL=/ elevator=deadline quiet - On sysctl.conf # Special network params net.core.rmem_default = 8388608 net.core.wmem_default = 8388608 net.core.rmem_max = 16777216 net.core.wmem_max = 16777216

I have four NFS servers running on Dell hardware (PE2900) under CentOS 5.7, x86_64. The number of NFS clients is about 170. A few days ago, one of the four, with no apparent changes, stopped responding to NFS requests for two minutes every half an hour (approx). Let's call this "the hang". It has been doing this for four days now. There are no log messages of any kind pertaining

Am 07.01.2016 um 11:58 schrieb Sébastien Le Ray: > Hi list (and happy new year), > > I'm experiencing some troubles using Samba (4.1.17 debian version) over > VPN. Basically we've following setup : > > PC === LAN ===> VPN (WAN) ==== LAN ===> Samba file Server > > Copying big (say > 1MiB) files from PC to Samba file server almost > always ends up with a

Le 07/01/2016 12:22, Reindl Harald a écrit : > > /usr/sbin/ifconfig eth0 txqueuelen 100 > ______________________________________________ > > ifcfg-eth0: > > ETHTOOL_OPTS="-K ${DEVICE} tso on lro off; -G ${DEVICE} rx 128 tx 128" > ______________________________________________ > > sysctl.conf: > > net.core.rmem_max = 65536 > net.core.wmem_max = 65536

OS: CentOS 5.0 x86. Hi, I am using CentOS 5.0 at home, ADSL ~16 Mbps/~1 Mbps Internet connection and my ping time to my ISP is 160-170 msec. When downloading something with Firefox, I am getting download speeds of about 100-180 KB/sec (for example when downloading SP2 of XP from MS server). Are the CentOS networking settings OK for this kind of latency, or do I have to change some settings?

i all I use linux as GiGE router and have 6 NIC on it Those days the NIC interrupt takes around 100% CPU but the system is 4G memroy and 8 CPU. I can't see any error packet in this NIC interface too After I block the udp, the %CPU drops. but the UDP only takes around 8M in general We use UDP traffic for voice. Do you have any suggestion ? increase the kernel parameter? Thank you so much

I'm using Samba & smbfs to make directories on a Linux file server available across a switched Gigabit network. Unfortunately, when mounting the shares to another Linux system with smbfs, the performance is terrible. To test the setup, I created both a 100mb and 650mb file and transferred them with ftp, smbclient, and smbfs (mounted share). I also used iperf to send each file, just out of

Hello! Hardver: Windows XP Compaq Proliant DL360, Linux Compaq Proliant DL380. 2 pieces of processors Intel Xeon 3,2GHz, 2GB RAM, 6 gigabit interface (2 tg3, 4 e1000), Debian Woody, 2.4.31 vanilla kernel. 6 U320 SCSI 15krpm HDD, 2 HDD RAID1 system, 4 HDD RAID1+0 data. Every network cards connect at speed of 1000MB full duplex, with XP crosscable (but we've tried with gigabit switch, too, we

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40 laforge@netfilter.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From laforge@netfilter.org 2003-02-03 16:49 ------- We haven't seen this

I thought that the below email would be of interest to LARTC readers. I wasted quite a bit of time tracking down this "feature" (bug?). Any comments that shed light on this would be appreciated. In short, "tc filter" + htb + bridging works only with ip_forward off. Andrew Athan ----------------------------------------------------------------------- All: It seems that

Hi everyone, I''m doing some networking experiments over high BDP topologies. Right now the configuration is quite simple -- two Xen boxes connected via a dummynet router. The dummynet router is set to limit bandwidth to 500Mbps and simulate an RTT of 80ms. I''m using the following sysctl values: net.ipv4.tcp_rmem = 4096 87380 4194304 net.ipv4.tcp_wmem = 4096

Hi, I''m doing some test on a network 10 gb nics and xen with version 3.1 i''m measuring 2.5 gb/sec from domU to an external physical machine with iperf. switching to 3.2 has reduced the measured performance to 40-50 Mb/sec. did anything change in the network interface? can someone help me? thanks _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list

I am running OpenSSH_6.7p1 on Slackware 14.1 x64. I haven't modified a stock config. On Linux TCP timeouts are controlled by these 3 files: $ cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_keepalive_time \ > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_keepalive_intvl \ > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_keepalive_probes 7200 75 9 These are their default values. I modified them to 3, 1, 1 respecitively before establishing a new SSH