similar to: FFT Resampler spectrograms

libswfdec/swfdec_text_field.c | 288 ---------------------------------- libswfdec/swfdec_text_field.h | 14 - libswfdec/swfdec_text_field_movie.c | 297 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- 3 files changed, 291 insertions(+), 308 deletions(-) New commits: commit 2e79c953066b7f6857e88e7efaaed4d8846e9609 Author: Pekka Lampila <pekka.lampila at iki.fi> Date: Wed Oct 17

I know that there is a function, (spectro3D), that produces the Power Spectrogram. Are there R functions that produce the Frequency Spectrogram and the Phase Spectrogram? Thank you for your time. [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Dear R-help, I have a matrix of data values specified in polar coordinates, i.e. (r,theta). I know that I can transform this image to Cartesian coordinates and then use image to display the results, however, I want to display the image as is, without any coordinate transformations. This would require displaying individual "pieces of pie" colour-coded by their data value. A comparable

libswfdec/Makefile.am | 2 libswfdec/swfdec_as_interpret.c | 19 libswfdec/swfdec_html_parser.c | 474 ----------- libswfdec/swfdec_initialize.as | 11 libswfdec/swfdec_initialize.h | 1118 +++++++++++++-------------- libswfdec/swfdec_text_field.c | 18 libswfdec/swfdec_text_field.h

Is LLVM expressive enough to represent asynchronous exceptions? --------------------------------------------------------------- Summary: Need new LLVM instructions or extending of all instructions. C++ exceptions are synchronous: the compiler knows when/where they are being raised. Asynchronous exceptions can be raised at any time. For example, an integer divide-by-zero may raise an

On 11-06-12 12:01 AM, Sohail Somani wrote: > Is LLVM expressive enough to represent asynchronous exceptions? > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Summary: Need new LLVM instructions or extending of all instructions. > > C++ exceptions are synchronous: the compiler knows when/where they are > being raised. > > Asynchronous exceptions can

Hi, I need to plot spectrogram of a waveform.What package offers this? -- Rajesh.J [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hello List and thanks in advance for all of your help, I am trying implement a permutation test of a multinomial logistic regression ('multinom' within the nnet package). In the end I want to compare the parameter estimate from my data to the distribution of randomized parameter estimates. I have figured out how to permute my dependent variable (MNNUM) x number of times, apply

Hi guys, as MP3 and Opus have very similar objectives, I think the original poster's question was a valid one: Why does Opus have more artefacts in the lower frequency ranges than MP3 has? The spontaneous suspect that lower frequency artefacts may be more noticeably than higher frequency artefacts seems plausible, also. Is it a matter of energy (which is higher for higher frequencies)? When

On 2017-11-01, Jean-Marc Valin wrote: > I'm not sure, but my best guess would be "because MP3's window is very > leaky and MP3 has to waste a lot of bits in the LF because of that". > It could also be just the MP3 encoder being silly, or other things. Was the original poster speaking about the SILK or the CELT derived mode? Because at least wrt SILK (and the rest of

Jean-Mark sarkasm. Jean-Markasm. (Bonus points for providing an actual noisy WAV! ^_^) On 30/10/2017 20:28, Jean-Marc Valin wrote: Hi, Before I comment on the graphics you posted to visualize the difference between two audio signals, I'd like to ask for your help in evaluating my JPEG encoder. I've encoded an image with JPEG and then computed the difference with the original. I then

Hi Folks, I'm interested in looking (in a beginner's amateurish way) at prosodic/phonetic analysis of recorded speech. In particular I would want to use R to formulate and evaluate specific models. So I would like to ask R people for their recommendations for a program which would a) Take as input a sound file in one of the common formats (".wav", ".au") b)

Dear all, I want to fit a random effect model with only one random factor. I do not want to include the intercept term either. The model I using now is lmer(values ~ (1|lot), data=tmp) The results are as below. How do I take out the intercept term? Or if this is not possible for the lmer function, is it possible using lme function in the "nlme" package? Thank you very much in

On 10/31/2017 07:08 PM, Ulrich Windl wrote: > as MP3 and Opus have very similar objectives, I think the original poster's > question was a valid one: Why does Opus have more artefacts in the lower > frequency ranges than MP3 has? I'm not sure, but my best guess would be "because MP3's window is very leaky and MP3 has to waste a lot of bits in the LF because of

Just to be clear, my goal here wasn't to make fun of anyone, but to drive the point that spectrograms should *never* be used to demonstrate quality. The only case where they can sometimes be useful is for diagnostic purposes. If you hear something and you're not sure what you're hearing exactly, then sometimes a spectrogram can help you figure out what it is. That's pretty much it.

Moving this month old RFC to llvmdev. Not sure why I sent this to cfe-dev in the first place... --- Based on code review discussion from John, he thinks filter expressions should be emitted into the body of the function with the try, rather than being outlined by the frontend. Instead of having the frontend create filter functions, we would use labels in place of typeinfo. The IR would look

SUMMARY I'm impressed. RC3 withstood anything I could throw at it. "-q 3" is really Vorbis' sweet spot, almost perfect, and "-q 0" is eminently usable, with only marginal defects for normal usage. Already sent money, will do that again. * * * I spent at least 40 hours in the last week testing RC3. I selected a few fragments from pop, classic and jazz CDs in my

Hi Reid, I’ve been following your proposal, and I’d be interested in helping out if I can. My main interest right now is in enabling C++ exception handling in clang for native (i.e. not mingw/cygwin) Windows targets (both 32-bit and 64-bit), but if I understand things correctly that will be closely related to your SEH work under the hood. I’m still trying to get up to speed on what is and is

Hello. Me again. Have you tried to encode piano solo? Noticed high bitrate Opus gave? And there's also artefact at 15kHz which wasn't in the original audio. Visible with Spek program. Download FLAC and Opus both files, new link: http://www.filedropper.com/example_3 FLAC full: 1084 kbps; FLAC solo: 465 kbps. with --bitrate 160: Opus full: 158 kbps; Opus solo: 190 kbps. Included also Spek

On Nov 05 18:00:06, hans at stare.cz wrote: > On Nov 05 11:32:49, hans at stare.cz wrote: > > On Nov 05 11:05:34, hans at stare.cz wrote: > > > > Did you also try to listen at the beginning, shortly before the real tone appears in the audible spectrum? While significantly larger, Opus had produced significant ghost noise (much less than Vorbis did)... > > I experience