similar to: FFT Resampler spectrograms

libswfdec/swfdec_text_field.c | 288 ---------------------------------- libswfdec/swfdec_text_field.h | 14 - libswfdec/swfdec_text_field_movie.c | 297 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- 3 files changed, 291 insertions(+), 308 deletions(-) New commits: commit 2e79c953066b7f6857e88e7efaaed4d8846e9609 Author: Pekka Lampila <pekka.lampila at iki.fi> Date: Wed Oct 17

I know that there is a function, (spectro3D), that produces the Power Spectrogram. Are there R functions that produce the Frequency Spectrogram and the Phase Spectrogram? Thank you for your time. [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Dear R-help, I have a matrix of data values specified in polar coordinates, i.e. (r,theta). I know that I can transform this image to Cartesian coordinates and then use image to display the results, however, I want to display the image as is, without any coordinate transformations. This would require displaying individual "pieces of pie" colour-coded by their data value. A comparable

libswfdec/Makefile.am | 2 libswfdec/swfdec_as_interpret.c | 19 libswfdec/swfdec_html_parser.c | 474 ----------- libswfdec/swfdec_initialize.as | 11 libswfdec/swfdec_initialize.h | 1118 +++++++++++++-------------- libswfdec/swfdec_text_field.c | 18 libswfdec/swfdec_text_field.h

Is LLVM expressive enough to represent asynchronous exceptions? --------------------------------------------------------------- Summary: Need new LLVM instructions or extending of all instructions. C++ exceptions are synchronous: the compiler knows when/where they are being raised. Asynchronous exceptions can be raised at any time. For example, an integer divide-by-zero may raise an

On 11-06-12 12:01 AM, Sohail Somani wrote: > Is LLVM expressive enough to represent asynchronous exceptions? > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Summary: Need new LLVM instructions or extending of all instructions. > > C++ exceptions are synchronous: the compiler knows when/where they are > being raised. > > Asynchronous exceptions can

Hi, I need to plot spectrogram of a waveform.What package offers this? -- Rajesh.J [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hello List and thanks in advance for all of your help, I am trying implement a permutation test of a multinomial logistic regression ('multinom' within the nnet package). In the end I want to compare the parameter estimate from my data to the distribution of randomized parameter estimates. I have figured out how to permute my dependent variable (MNNUM) x number of times, apply

Hi guys, as MP3 and Opus have very similar objectives, I think the original poster's question was a valid one: Why does Opus have more artefacts in the lower frequency ranges than MP3 has? The spontaneous suspect that lower frequency artefacts may be more noticeably than higher frequency artefacts seems plausible, also. Is it a matter of energy (which is higher for higher frequencies)? When

On 2017-11-01, Jean-Marc Valin wrote: > I'm not sure, but my best guess would be "because MP3's window is very > leaky and MP3 has to waste a lot of bits in the LF because of that". > It could also be just the MP3 encoder being silly, or other things. Was the original poster speaking about the SILK or the CELT derived mode? Because at least wrt SILK (and the rest of

Jean-Mark sarkasm. Jean-Markasm. (Bonus points for providing an actual noisy WAV! ^_^) On 30/10/2017 20:28, Jean-Marc Valin wrote: Hi, Before I comment on the graphics you posted to visualize the difference between two audio signals, I'd like to ask for your help in evaluating my JPEG encoder. I've encoded an image with JPEG and then computed the difference with the original. I then

Hi Folks, I'm interested in looking (in a beginner's amateurish way) at prosodic/phonetic analysis of recorded speech. In particular I would want to use R to formulate and evaluate specific models. So I would like to ask R people for their recommendations for a program which would a) Take as input a sound file in one of the common formats (".wav", ".au") b)

Dear all, I want to fit a random effect model with only one random factor. I do not want to include the intercept term either. The model I using now is lmer(values ~ (1|lot), data=tmp) The results are as below. How do I take out the intercept term? Or if this is not possible for the lmer function, is it possible using lme function in the "nlme" package? Thank you very much in

> Why are you using a stereo file > containing the same sweep in both channels > and then downmixing to mono? When I first tried encoding at a higher bitrate, I needed to test the different behavior of the "mid" (l+r) and "side" (l-r) channels. That's why I made the first sweep identical on both the left and the right channel (i.e. "side" is silent)

On 10/31/2017 07:08 PM, Ulrich Windl wrote: > as MP3 and Opus have very similar objectives, I think the original poster's > question was a valid one: Why does Opus have more artefacts in the lower > frequency ranges than MP3 has? I'm not sure, but my best guess would be "because MP3's window is very leaky and MP3 has to waste a lot of bits in the LF because of

On Aug 07 08:30:31, hans at stare.cz wrote: > On Aug 07 00:41:52, petrparizek2000 at yahoo.com wrote: > > ????#1. To test encoding at low bitrates, I encoded a sine sweep at 12 kbps > > with Opusenc and then decoded the resulting file with Opusdec. > 1) Opusenc --bitrate 12 --downmix-mono Sweep50.wav Sweep50.opus Why are you using a stereo file containing the same sweep in both

Just to be clear, my goal here wasn't to make fun of anyone, but to drive the point that spectrograms should *never* be used to demonstrate quality. The only case where they can sometimes be useful is for diagnostic purposes. If you hear something and you're not sure what you're hearing exactly, then sometimes a spectrogram can help you figure out what it is. That's pretty much it.

On Aug 07 22:04:21, petrparizek2000 at yahoo.com wrote: > > The encoded opus file is 48kHz, > > so how would the output wav be resampled from 16kHz? To be clear: did you mean the opus output of opusenc or the wav output of opusdec? > > What are those "clear signs" exactly? > > The things that I can hear while listening at 1/2 or even 1/4 of the > original

Moving this month old RFC to llvmdev. Not sure why I sent this to cfe-dev in the first place... --- Based on code review discussion from John, he thinks filter expressions should be emitted into the body of the function with the try, rather than being outlined by the frontend. Instead of having the frontend create filter functions, we would use labels in place of typeinfo. The IR would look

On Aug 07 00:41:52, petrparizek2000 at yahoo.com wrote: > ????#1. To test encoding at low bitrates, I encoded a sine sweep at 12 kbps > with Opusenc and then decoded the resulting file with Opusdec. What sine sweep exactly? How did you obtain it, and how exactly did you encode and decode it? Jan > The strange > thing was that even though the output wave file was at 48 kHz, it