similar to: Re: Problem with Blackfin assembly optimizations -- bug in fixed_bfin.h / resampler saturation???

Hi, I just started to examine the DIV32_16 function (Blackfin ASM version), and wondered why the return value of the function inside 'fixed_bfin.h' is of type 'spx_word16_t', but the local variable 'res' which is returned by this function is of type 'spx_word32_t'. Is this a trick of optimization or a bug? (Same question for PDIV32_16 and MAX16, too!) best

Hi, when I compile with FIXED_DEBUG enabled, I get an error -- both when make tries to build testenc.o and when I try to link my app against the speex lib: lorenz@panelmaker:~/Blackfin/tests/speex_loopthrough$ make bfin-uclinux-gcc -c -g -I/home/lorenz/include -o main.o main.c bfin-uclinux-gcc -gl -elf2flt -L/home/lorenz/lib -o speex_through main.o -lspeex_debug -lspeexdsp -lm

Hi Jean-Marc, after some problems with getting svn to work here I finally made it. Problem is, you write that I cannot use libspeex and libspeexdsp at the same time now -- because I use a "live" system (mic-in -> speex_enc -> speex_dec -> headphone out) and I can run the AD1836 audio codec on 48 kHz only, I cannot use my program now (because I use speex resampling...) So I

Jean-Marc, Frank, I have stumbled across a similar situation regarding optimization. I seem to have a similar setup as Frank does with a fixed 48khz in and out. The wideband mode and ultra-wideband modes are really what I?m looking for. I have a test application that reads audio, downsample to 16kHz (or 32kHz), speex encode, speex decode, upsample back to 48kHz, and playback. If I remove

Hi Jean-Marc, didn't get a reply to my last post (see below) -- do you have no idea what happens here? After some more tests, I disabled the DIV32_16 Blackfin optimizations and now get good quality on the Blackfin. But when I have overdrive on the input, things become very bad -- I'm not sure if this is really a filter stability issue like I wrote some weeks ago. I use the speex

Frank Lorenz a ?crit : > And yes, the same "overflow" happens even when I disable Blackfin ASM > optimizations. Indeed, that shouldn't happen. Just to make sure I understand, so far there's two problems: 1) DIV32_16() in Blackfin assembly causes problems 2) The resampler overflows When you fix/workaround those two, is the encoder/decoder working correctly or are there

Hi Jean-Marc, I did some further checks with 1.2 beta 3: The problematic function is DIV32_16 inside fixed_bfin.h. When I comment it out (i.e. replace it by the generic version of the routine), the quality improves significantly. Nevertheless, there is still a horrible distortion when there is some overdrive/saturation in the input signal. For me, it looks like there's an instable filter

Hello everybody, I'm currently trying to run speex on the Blackfin (BF-537) STAMP evaluation board unter uCLinux. Using 1.2 beta 3, I encountered problems when activating the Blackfin assembler optimizations. Without optimizations for blackfin, i.e. calling ./configure --enable-fixed-point --host=bfin-uclinux everything seems to work fine. But when I add the --enable-blackfin-asm flag to

Hi Marc, I encountered the problems even with older versions of speex, including 1.2beta2 and 1.1.12, too. I had no time in the last weeks to investigate this issue further, sorry. Hopefully, I'm able to do some more test the next days, but I have no real idea how to proceed Performance and quality seem to be o.k. for me if I deactivate the Blackfin optimizations inside the file

Here some Blackfin inline assembly, mainly picked and adapted from speex. It's helps a little on my BF537 eval board. Julien -------- /** @file fixed_bfin.h @brief Fixed-point operations for the ADI BF5xx DSP family */ /* Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are met: -

> -----Message d'origine----- > De : Jean-Marc Valin [mailto:jean-marc.valin at usherbrooke.ca] > Envoy? : dimanche, 14. juin 2009 20:46 > ? : Stephane Lesage > Cc : speex-dev at xiph.org > Objet : Re: [Speex-dev] Resampler saturation > > Just to make sure I understand, the two patches you sent are > two different ways to fix the problem, with the only >

> -----Message d'origine----- > De : Jean-Marc Valin [mailto:jean-marc.valin at usherbrooke.ca] > Envoy? : lundi, 15. juin 2009 01:30 > ? : Stephane Lesage > Cc : speex-dev at xiph.org > Objet : Re: [Speex-dev] Resampler saturation, blackfin performance > > - are there buffers who could be placed in scratch memory ? > > (I don't see any speex_scratch_alloc

> >Actually, you're the first I know using the VisualDSP++ toolchain :-) > I guess that's because speex has pretty big memory footprint. So developers that integrate speex tend to have plenty of RAM and once one has plenty of RAM he could install biggish OS. And between biggish OSes for Blackfin the most popular choice is uCLinux. And ucLinux works best with gnu tools. Something

Most asm statements clobber ASTAT bits (shifts, maxes, etc...) but do declare the register as clobbered. Same thing with CC in a few places. Some places make an attempt at clobbering some hardware loop registers, but it's very incomplete compared with how many asm statements actually use hardware loops. Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier at gentoo.org> --- libspeex/bfin.h

Hi Jean-Marc I'm trying to integrate your speex codec on our custom Blackfin board. The board is not uCLinux compatible and there is no chance that it will ever be. I am using ADI-supplied VisualDSP++ IDE and corresponding toolchain. As long as I am compiling "C"-only version of the library everything is fine. VisualDSP++ produces working library. There is only one not so minor

-----Original Message----- From: Robin Getz [mailto:rgetz@blackfin.uclinux.org] Sent: Saturday, June 16, 2007 12:11 AM To: Michael Shatz Cc: speex-dev@xiph.org Subject: Re: [Speex-dev] Blackfin inline assembler and VisualDSP++ toolchain >On Wed 13 Jun 2007 12:37, Michael Shatz pondered: >> >> Hi Jean-Marc >> >> I'm trying to integrate your speex codec on our

O.k., some more info: I just tested bandwidth widening to fix this. But I need to go to gamma values below 0.9 to become stable -- clearly too much widening, I think. I looked inside the Levinson-Durbin algorithm next. The lines #ifdef FIXED_POINT r = DIV32_16(rr+PSHR32(error,1),ADD16(error,8)); #else r = rr/(error+.003*ac[0]); #endif look interesting. While for floating point,

>-----Original Message----- >From: Robin Getz [mailto:rgetz@blackfin.uclinux.org] >Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2007 9:35 PM > > >On Tue 19 Jun 2007 13:00, Michael Shatz pondered: >> Robin Getz wrote: >> >I never met any hardware that gcc could not run code on. toolchains have >> >nothing do with embedded OSes. >> >> That's true. Add some

Hi Jean-Marc, I use the resampler to convert various sampling frequencies to 48 kHz on my Blackfin platform (fixed-point) 48K -> 16K speex -> 48K chain does not sound very good compared to plain 16K. But the main issue is when processing loud signals, I have truncation (and not clipping/saturation) I could hear it and see it with various music and speech messages. See example.png. I also

Hi Jean-Marc, > Can you confirm I'm understanding everything correctly? You encode > with > the same encoder and then decode with either A) blackfin assembly and > fixed-point or B) fixed-point only on Blackfin. Then A) sounds bad and > B) sounds good. If you do the same in narrowband, it sounds OK. Is > that > correct? If that's the case, it's *probably* some