similar to: Testing Help

Jean-Marc Valin wrote: >> What commercial VOIP test products can I turn to in order to objectively >> evaluate your CODEC; in order to analyze audio streams for MOS scores and >> performance parameters? >> > > The MOS evaluation is subjective, not objective and actually involves > getting (many) real people to listen to the audio, not just buying a >

Hello, I just signed up to this mailing-list (note: my first mailing list at all), because I'm having some problems related to speex. Let me just introduce you to what I'm doing. I am writing a short (really short) paper about VoIP techniques, especially audio codecs for speech. I pointed out basic technologies behind audio codecs; vector quantization, lpc, long-term prediction and some

> What commercial VOIP test products can I turn to in order to objectively > evaluate your CODEC; in order to analyze audio streams for MOS scores and > performance parameters? The MOS evaluation is subjective, not objective and actually involves getting (many) real people to listen to the audio, not just buying a product. Of course, there's tools like PESQ that attempt to guess MOS

Hello out there! Nooby question: What''s the "Rails" way to work with tables of relatively static lookup data? Objectively (I''m thinking); I don''t want to hit the DB each time, so for each lookup table, initialize a globally available hash with lable/value pairs... Am I on the right track? How would you do this kind of thing in Rails? Thanks! --

Francois Menard (Mailing List Account) wrote: > > did you try speex in wideband mode ... what bitrate? > > f. 15kbps mode. It does significantly better with a different speaker (the male does better than the female), as well. I'm considering purchasing a commercial PESQ license and wrap the PESQ software in a server application. I could then allow other folks to run PESQ

Hello! Some time back, I added the Speex protocol to my version of VOCAL (www.vovida.org, VOIP tool). Recently, I also added PESQ (automated voice quality testing algorithm) to my tool and have been running some tests on a clean network. The source file is a woman reading some phrases meant to test various aspects of codecs... Speex has a respectable result of 3.67 Some other codecs I've

I was wondering if the developers were using anything to "objectively" test the quality of the speex vocoder. For instance PSQM or one of the many derivatives. Mean Opinion Scoring seems an expensive route. Is there some open source software to use for this? <p>--- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/ To

Hello everybody! I’m trying to define the optimal number of surveys to detect the highest number of species within a monitoring season/session. To do this I want to run all the possible combinations between a set of samples and to calculate the total number of species for each combination of 2, 3, 4 …n samples events, so that at the end I will be able to define which is the lowest number of

Hi Kevin, Are you saying that the quality is good at 20 ms and bad at 10 ms, or the reverse? Also, is this speech or music? What tool, what options? In general, it helps a lot if you post the sample (input and output). Cheers, Jean-Marc On 06/03/2016 12:48 PM, Kevin Connor wrote: > Hi Opus list, > > I'm noticing a discontinuity in the quality between use of 10ms and > 20ms

Dear all I am a newbie to R and I would appreciate it very much if someone can give me some advice on this. Please note that I am not a programmer so some of the questions might sound really stupid. I would like to compute McDonald's omega calculation using R, I'm aware I can use the omega function in the psych package. But I'm really not sure how to do it. I have read these two

OK. Different mailing lists are set up differently. This list is unusual because your answers only go to the person who replied to you. So if you want the other people on the listserv to see your answer, you should make sure that Speex-dev at xiph.org<mailto:Speex-dev at xiph.org> is added to the TO: field of your outgoing message. Hopefully someone else will also attempt to answer your

Hi Jim, First of all - thanks, turning the highpass filter off was what I needed, and the waveforms match now. But, when i did the PESQ tests again I found an interesting result : version 1.0.5 still got a slightly better average score, but the standard deviation on version 1.2 beta1 was much smaller. The cause for that is this - on some samples versions 1.0.5 and 1.2beta2 produced a single

Hi, I have been using speex version 1.0.5 on a text-to-speech program. Recently I upgraded to version 1.2beta1 and noticed that the waveform the I got after encoding and decoding on the new versions (beta1,beta2) is much more different than the original than on version 1.0.5. I also ran a PESQ comparison test on 700 voice samples and got better results in the older version (I used quality 9, and

Hi Lin, In addition to bug 6541114... Bug ID 6541114 Synopsis GRUB/ZFS fails to load files from a default compressed (lzjb) root ... I found yet another way to get the "Error 16: Inconsistent filesystem structure" from GRUB. This time when trying to boot a Xen Dom0 from a zfs bootfs Synopsis: grub/zfs-root: cannot boot xen from a zfs root

Hello, What is meant by crude delay in PESQ quality testing? And what is its tolerant limit for good quality. rgds, Sharan

Is there any tool that can do LCR for Asterisk but also take into account MOS scores? Is it possible to automatically generate MOS scores on random "calls" so as to keep an updated database on a per provider, per destination, per time-of-day score? Hopefully, with that information we can create a better LCR module or script? Thanks, Daniel

Hello developers, I have a question about supported bitrates for SPEEX. Regardless of whether I specify a 10kbps or a 8kbps bitrate, the encoded .spx file is the same size and have the same PESQ value. This makes me wonder if SPEEX supports arbitrary bitrates, or only a certain set. A few more details about my configuration: I am using SPEEX encoder version 1.1.12 I am encoding a narrowband

Hi all, Just wanted to give a quick update on the plan for the 3.6 release. I had hoped to have at least posted a schedule by now, but I also don't want us to have two releases in flight at the same time, so the plan is to wait until 3.5.1 is done. My tentative plan is to branch early January. Please let me know what you think. Cheers, Hans

Hello All, MOS and R factor are the two QoS parameters used to estimate VoIP call quality. I have found that they are calculated from other metrics like jitter, latency, packet loss,...etc. But, haven't found any formula or arithmetic rule to calculate them. Do you have an idea about their formulas or an open source that calculates them. Is it possible to interpret them from wireshark.

On 07/10/2018 09:23 AM, dclist at list.jmatt.net wrote: >> A colleague asked me if it was possible for Dovecot to store messages >> in the cloud.? > > Does he have a more specific description of what he wants than ?in the > cloud?, or does he just like using buzzwords? ?From a user perspective, > I would say that Dovecot, or any other IMAP server, already stores >