similar to: about the quality option

Hi Jim, First of all - thanks, turning the highpass filter off was what I needed, and the waveforms match now. But, when i did the PESQ tests again I found an interesting result : version 1.0.5 still got a slightly better average score, but the standard deviation on version 1.2 beta1 was much smaller. The cause for that is this - on some samples versions 1.0.5 and 1.2beta2 produced a single

Hi, all, I am new to this mail list. I have a question here. I just downloaded speex-1.2beta2.tar.gz and wanted to compile it with Visual Studio 2003. but I failed because I can not find the following file: speex-1.2beta2\libspeex\medfilter.c Could any one help me on this? Thanks, -Allen

Hi everyone, I just released Speex 1.2beta2. Release notes: Again, this new releases brings many improvements. The RAM requirement for wideband has gone down drastically (i.e. more than 2x). A new resampler module has been added, providing arbitrary sampling rate conversion -- fast. The echo canceller has also been improved. A bug in 1.2beta1 that made the echo canceller unstable has been fixed.

hello, i am experiencing some persistent compilation errors with both the 1.2beta2 release and the svn speex-trunk: ====================== speexdec.o(.text+0x23b): In function `out_file_open': /speex-trunk/src/speexdec.c:158: undefined reference to `_oss_ioctl' speexdec.o(.text+0x268):/speex-trunk/src/speexdec.c:168: undefined reference to `_oss_ioctl'

Hello speex development team! As I see on http://www.speex.org/downloads/ page, where is no Windows binaries for speex encoder and decoder tools for 1.2beta2 version since no maintainer for it yet. Well, I compiled it from the sources using MSYS environment and MinGW tools (GCC version is 3.4.5). Both libOgg-1.1.3 and speex-1.2beta2 were configured as "./configure

Hi, I have been using speex version 1.0.5 on a text-to-speech program. Recently I upgraded to version 1.2beta1 and noticed that the waveform the I got after encoding and decoding on the new versions (beta1,beta2) is much more different than the original than on version 1.0.5. I also ran a PESQ comparison test on 700 voice samples and got better results in the older version (I used quality 9, and

> Quoting Stephane Lesage <stephane.lesage at ateis-international.com>: > > Is this a bug ? Is it possible to fix it ? > > (I use version speex 1.2beta2, because newer versions just > don't work > > on my > > platform) > > This is probable the cause. 1.2beta2 was the first release to > include the resampler and it had many bugs. I suggest trying

Hi, Jean-Marc, I have another quick question, I got following message when compile speexdec.exe: Linking... libspeex.lib(sb_celp.obj) : error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol _lpc_window Release/speexdec.exe : fatal error LNK1120: 1 unresolved externals Where does this lpc_window declare? Thanks a lot, -Allen On 8/8/07, Jean-Marc Valin <jean-marc.valin@usherbrooke.ca> wrote: >

hello again, on NetBSD the library ossaudio needs to be linked in for speex to build. i did it by hand in the src/Makefile by altering LDFLAGS to "-lossaudio". it now compiles properly. thanks for your time, b On 10/11/07, Jean-Marc Valin <jean-marc.valin@usherbrooke.ca> wrote: > > Seems like NetBSD doesn't like the ioctl calls. Maybe you need to link > with another

Hi, I am using speex 1.2beta2 on a C5416, 16 bit, narrowband. The project I am implementing speex into is very limited in Data space. In the speex decode_init and encode_init there are allocs that, combined, take up 0x0F94 of data memory. I do not know why the various allocs are sized the way they are but that number is too big to fit into our project. I was wondering if those numbers (for

Hi everyone, I'm planning on releasing Speex 1.2beta2 in the next few days. I'd appreciate if everyone could try and test the current svn to make sure no bug crept in for your favourite plarform/application. Cheers, Jean-Marc

Hi, I am an user of speex codec.Can I ask some question about the speexcodec 1.2beta2 on installed to linux(fedora 6) thanks! After I downloaded the latest version of codec then I type the commands to install : configure -prefix=/home/...../test -enable-shared -enable-static make make install then I try to compile my encode.c here is the encode.c of mine: =====================================

Hi Jean-Marc, We needed to use a release version of the SDK because this part of production code for our Sony implementations. I'm not sure how stable that branch is. Is the encoding and decoding already stable? In other words, what is not stable about that branch? Thanks, --------------------------- Saad Nader Middleware Engineer Powered By Gamespy, IGN -----Original Message----- From:

What would be a good parameter to return that would better represent the loudness of the signal? As for the your other comments, I'll make the necessary changes and resubmit. Thanks, Mihai On Oct 25, 2007, at 7:45 PM, Jean-Marc Valin wrote: > I'm in favor of the idea, but not of the current implementation. There > are two problems: > 1) The st->loudness parameter

Skipped content of type multipart/mixed-------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 2411 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/speex-dev/attachments/20071025/268c3593/smime.bin

Hi I downloaded speex-1.2beta2 from svn.xiph.org/releases/speex and am trying to build the win32/VS2005/libspeex/lipspeex.vcproj When I try to build the Release configuration, I get the following error: LNK1181: cannot open input file '.\Release\medfilter.obj' Trying to build the Debug or Release_Dynamic configurations gives a related error: C1083: cannot open source file:

Hi, Speex-dev I've been able to get Speex to compile on SM400M(MIPSII) with problems. ------ Rebuild All started: Project: speexenc, Configuration: Debug SM400M (MIPSII) ------ Deleting intermediate and output files for project 'speexenc', configuration 'Debug|SM400M (MIPSII)' Compiling... getopt.c getopt1.c skeleton.c speexenc.c .\speexenc.c(501) : warning

On 10/1/07, Jean-Marc Valin <jean-marc.valin@usherbrooke.ca> wrote: > I'm aware of Microchip's closed-source port of Speex to the dsPIC. As > far as I know (haven't checked the details), this is perfectly legal, > even though I think it's a dumb decision for a company that's in the > business of selling chips. I say it's dumb because by not contributing

Hi Jean-Marc, I use the resampler to convert various sampling frequencies to 48 kHz on my Blackfin platform (fixed-point) 48K -> 16K speex -> 48K chain does not sound very good compared to plain 16K. But the main issue is when processing loud signals, I have truncation (and not clipping/saturation) I could hear it and see it with various music and speech messages. See example.png. I also

Dear all, In the download section of the Speex web site, you can find the Windows DLLs until the 1.2beta2 version, but for the newest version 1.2rc1 there aren?t any available. Therefore, I?m trying to generate the Windows DLLs for the 1.2rc1 version using the MSVC 2005 project files available in the source code. After a lot of problems, finally I have generated the DLLs. However there is a