similar to: rtp payload lenth

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 3000 matches similar to: "rtp payload lenth"

2007 Sep 17
5
rtp payload lenth
Hello to all speex developers, I have question regarding payload length of narrowband speex in RTP. I were watching tcpdump of the xlite softphone and have found that it uses weird payload length namely 75 Bytes I went through various source and without success. To be clear: For 8000Hz sample in 20 ms that is 160 samples per frame. This makes 50 frames per sec. modes bit-rate 8 kbit/s
2007 Sep 17
0
rtp payload lenth
Not sure what a payload of 75 bytes could be. Are you sure that doesn't include the 12-byte RTP header? Other than that, maybe it's using wideband (although there's nothing that corresponds exactly to 75 bytes. If you send me the hexdump for one packet, I may be able to find out what it is. Jean-Marc Pawel Cyrta wrote: > Hello to all speex developers, > > I have question
2007 Sep 18
0
rtp payload lenth
Hi, (moving back to the list as some bits can be useful to everyone) > I am sure that 75 is the length of payload only. Confirmed > I also don't have idea for the package containing data of a length 46. > > To make everything more clear, Payload type in rtp packages is 97. > SDP defines the stream as > a=rtpmap: 97 SPEEX/8000 That's a dynamic payload number, so it
2007 May 29
0
draft-ietf-avt-rtp-speex-01.txt
Alfred E. Heggestad wrote: > <...> > > If we don't get any comments in 1 week (by 22. May 2007) we will go ahead > and submit it to the IETF. Of course you can comment on it also after it > has been submitted, but we would like to get the input from the Speex > community first.. > thanks for all the input. please find attached an updated version of the draft. I
2007 Jun 07
0
draft-ietf-avt-rtp-speex-01.txt
Hi Please find an updated version of the Speex I-D attached. The only change is addition of the copyright conditions in Appendix A, as requested by Ivo. Many thanks for your input. I will give you a few more days before submitting to AVT working group /alfred Ivo Emanuel Gon?alves wrote: > Do not forget to add the "Copying conditions" to the RFC. > > Check
2007 Jun 07
1
draft-ietf-avt-rtp-speex-01.txt
Looks good to me. Jean-Marc Alfred E. Heggestad a ?crit : > Hi > > Please find an updated version of the Speex I-D attached. The only > change is addition of the copyright conditions in Appendix A, > as requested by Ivo. > > Many thanks for your input. > > I will give you a few more days before submitting to AVT working group > > > /alfred > > Ivo
2008 Nov 04
0
payload length of narrowband speex in RTP
Hello to all speex developers I have question regarding payload length of narrowband speex in RTP. I were watching tcpdump of the xlite softphone and have found that it uses constant payload length 75 Bytes. The packet size should be variable, right? Why I get constant packet size? Thank you Yuanchao Lu -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:
2004 Aug 06
0
First draft for Speex RTP profile - Please send your comments
Hi, We'd like to announce the first draft for the Speex RTP profile. It was written essentially by Greg Herlein, with some help from Simon Morlat and I. We'd like to get some feedback on it before it is sent to the IETF. Basically this will allow all SIP based VoIP applications using Speex to inter-operate. For those interested, there's already Simon's LinPhone (www.linphone.org)
2007 Oct 02
1
One packet with multiple frames in VBR
Hi, Is is possible to have no problems with VBR speex mode "on" and send multiple frames in one RTP packet? I can't find that in IETF draft. As Jean-Marc said previously, speex decoder recognise the mode of each frame by looking on first 5 bits, thus there shouldn't be a problem with receiving & decoding speex bitstream. However, I found multiple speex frames (say 2) with
2004 Aug 06
0
RTP Profile Revision v5
All: Attached please find yet another RTP profile revision (v5). You can also find the document at: http://www.herlein.com/downloads/speex/docs/ Changes: - added vbr, cng, ebw, sr optional parameters to MIME - added vbr, cng, ebw a=fmtp options for SDP use - added required document attributes for submission to IETF and IANA (format and author contact information). Note that we
2004 Aug 06
0
draft-herlein-speex-rtp-profile-01
Hi all, Please find below the -01 update to draft-herlein-speex-rtp-profile, as submitted to the IETF. Regards Phil <p>-------------------8<-----------------------------------8<--------------------- <p><p>Internet Engineering Task Force Greg Herlein Internet Draft Jean-Marc Valin
2004 Aug 06
0
Updated Speex RTP Internet Draft
Hello, What's the purpose of the 'sr' sdp parameter ? The sample rate is already given in the a=rtpmap line ? Simon Le dim 29/06/2003 à 12:12, philkerr@elec.gla.ac.uk a écrit : > Hi all, > > Please find below an updated Speex Internet Draft document. > > It would be good if we could book some time for discussion on Speex at the IETF > meeting in Vienna (scheduled
2007 May 15
0
draft-ietf-avt-rtp-speex-01.txt
Here my comments: Page 3: To be compliant with this specification, implementations MUST support 8 kHz sampling rate (narrowband)" and SHOULD support 8 kbps bitrate. The sampling rate MUST be 8, 16 or 32 kHz. There is a type above after (narrowband), there is a " extra character. I don't understand what is the motivation to specify "SHOULD support 8 kbps
2004 Aug 06
0
Comments on New RTP Profile Document
The latest revision of the draft profile for use of Speex in RTP is attached. We plan on submitting this - or a modified version of this, based on immediate feedback - to the IETF on Monday for consideration at the next meeting. Major differences in this revision are: - removed the discussion in the MIME section. It's a duplicate of the SDP discussion anyway, and may or may not match the
2007 May 15
4
draft-ietf-avt-rtp-speex-01.txt
Hi all We are about to send an updated version of the internet draft "RTP Payload Format for the Speex Codec" to the IETF AVT working group. Before submitting we would like your input, if you have any comments or input please send them to the mailing list. If we don't get any comments in 1 week (by 22. May 2007) we will go ahead and submit it to the IETF. Of course you can comment
2007 Oct 04
1
Wideband bitrate documentation
Hi, On http://www.speex.org/docs/manual/speex-manual/node11.html#SECTION001140000000000000000 the bitrate for Speex Wideband mode 9 and 10 is 9 34,400 10 42,400 On http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-avt-rtp-speex-03 the bitrate for Speex Wideband mode 9 and 10 is 9 34.2 kbit/s 10 42.2 kbit/s I believe the draft contains the right values: E.g. mode 10 Narrowband mode 7 -> 492
2004 Aug 06
1
RTP Profile Revision
The latest revision of the draft RTP Profile is attached for review. This will be submitted to the IETF Audio-Video Transport Working Group for consideration immediately, so if you have any more comments, let us know. In addition, we will be applying for an official MIME type. Note that the AVP code and the MIME type in this latest revision have been changed from "SPX" to
2007 May 16
0
draft-ietf-avt-rtp-speex-01.txt
comment inline. On Wed, 16 May 2007, Jean-Marc Valin wrote: >> Page 3: >> >> To be compliant with this specification, implementations MUST support >> 8 kHz sampling rate (narrowband)" and SHOULD support 8 kbps bitrate. >> The sampling rate MUST be 8, 16 or 32 kHz. >> >> There is a type above after (narrowband), there is a " extra
2007 May 16
2
draft-ietf-avt-rtp-speex-01.txt
> Page 3: > > To be compliant with this specification, implementations MUST support > 8 kHz sampling rate (narrowband)" and SHOULD support 8 kbps bitrate. > The sampling rate MUST be 8, 16 or 32 kHz. > > There is a type above after (narrowband), there is a " extra character. > > I don't understand what is the motivation to specify "SHOULD
2005 Nov 30
1
RTP profile draft!
Hi Jean-Marc and list, I'm trying to negotiate speex with SIP/SDP and get some trouble understanding the "mode" parameter: mode: Speex encoding mode. Can be {1,2,3,4,5,6,any} defaults to 3 in narrowband, 6 in wide and ultra-wide. Is mode equivalent to the "quality" parameter of speex? In this case, I don't understand why mode is not from 1 to 10... Just