similar to: SSE bug on Win32 with GCC 4.2.1

Jean-Marc Valin wrote: >> I recently found a .. weird bug on Win32 SSE with GCC 4.2.1. >> >> In libspeex/cb_search_sse.h, the following union is used: >> >> union { >> float __a[4]; >> __m128 __v; >> } __u; >> >> For some odd reason, this particular version of GCC will not 16-byte >> align the union. IE; the alignment

Spam detection software, running on the system "mail.montanhydraulik.com", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see postmaster for details. Content preview: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1

Spam detection software, running on the system "mail.montanhydraulik.com", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see postmaster for details. Content preview: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1

Spam detection software, running on the system "mail.montanhydraulik.com", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see postmaster for details. Content preview: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1

Actually, it might just be an OS "feature".. On most linux and mac platforms, the memory managers align memory on proper boundaries -- this doesn't occur on most versions of windows. I don't have all the code in front of me, but it's possible that it's simply a side effect of windows not aligning the memory, and an implicit assumption in the speex code that it will have

Duane Storey a ?crit : > Actually, it might just be an OS "feature".. On most linux and mac > platforms, the memory managers align memory on proper boundaries -- this > doesn't occur on most versions of windows. I don't have all the code in > front of me, but it's possible that it's simply a side effect of windows not > aligning the memory, and an

This mail is probably spam. The original message has been altered so you can recognise or block similar unwanted mail in future. See http://www.silvervalley.k12.ca.us/index.php/195 for more details. This isn't spam? Please forward this message to postmaster@silvervalley.k12.ca.us with a request that the e-mail address you received this from be whitelisted. Content preview: Hi! Anyone know

Spam detection software, running on the system "mail.montanhydraulik.com", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or block similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi, You just sent an email to my

I have had the same email address since 1997 (when microsoft stole bob.com from me thanks to network solutions...) In the early days I of course was free with my email and used it everwhere. Fast forward to 2012, some 15 years later. woof..the amount of spam sent to me has always just kept getting worse and worse. On my centos 5 server I just used sendmail with spamassassin and it killed a

Here are our notes on 1.1.4 testing on Windows 1. Compile Error with regular mode (FIXED_POINT undefined) at lsp.c line 104 static inline spx_word16_t spx_cos(spx_word16_t x) . VS6 does not like the inline keyword here. Removing it allows compiling. same with cb_search_sse.h line 34. 2. Compile Error with quant_lsp.c line 55. M_PI is undefined. Either it needs to be included

From: Thorvald Natvig <slicer at users.sourceforge.net> Some optimizing compilers miscompile the current SSE optimizations when full optimizations are enabled. By using output value pointer instead of a return value, we can bypass this misbehaviour. --- libspeex/resample.c | 8 ++++---- libspeex/resample_sse.h | 24 ++++++++---------------- 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 20

On 8/23/07, Thorvald Natvig <speex@natvig.com> wrote: > Jean-Marc Valin wrote: > > Duane Storey a ?crit : > >> Actually, it might just be an OS "feature".. On most linux and mac > >> platforms, the memory managers align memory on proper boundaries -- this > >> doesn't occur on most versions of windows. I don't have all the code in >

Dear Friend, I done configuration using RBLSMTPD with WHITELIST, but I don't know it is correct. Please check files below are corrects. Thanks Adriano === FILE WHITELIST.DOMINIO.RBL. ==== $ttl 900 whitelist.dominio.rbl. IN SOA host1.xxxxxx.com. root.xxxxx.com. ( 2006112002 ; serial; 3600 ; refresh period (1 hora); 900 ; retry time (15 minutos); 1800 ; expire tiem (30 minutos); 900 ;

Seems we got a release candidate today. http://homepage3.nifty.com/blacksword/ And oh yeah, thanks for blocking me from participation on this list: " SMTP error from remote mailer after initial connection: host smtp.osuosl.org [140.211.166.133]: 550 Service unavailable; Client host [217.209.222.131] blocked using dynablock.njabl.org; Dynamic/Residential IP range listed by NJABL

Hi everybody, I am trying to work with quota. I use postfix and dovecot with a sql backend. Below you'll find my configuration. Everything works except for the quota part. It doesn't seem to see the quota and doesn't respond to the sender that the client is over its quota. versions: postfix-2.5.20070531-mysql dovecot-1.0.2-mysql Thanks for the help in advance. My Settings: #

Hi, I love llvm vectors, yet I wonder why some advanced vector operations are specific to some CPU targets? Let me take an example: /// Horizontally adds the adjacent pairs of values contained in two /// 128-bit vectors of [4 x float]. /// /// \headerfile <x86intrin.h> /// /// This intrinsic corresponds to the <c> VHADDPS </c> instruction. /// /// \param __a /// A

Hello again, Jeremy, first of all, I am terribly sorry for my late reply. I tried to send my posting many times, but my mail has always been silently discarded by the Samba mail servers due to my main mail provider (GMX - a very large German mail provider with millions of customers) having been blacklisted by SORBS. For the time being, SORBS is still unwilling to delist them for unknown

Hi Craig, Thank you very much for your answer. I did not want to discuss exactly the semantic and name of one operation but instead raise the question "would it be beneficial to have more vector builtins?". You wrote that the compiler will recognize a pattern and replace it by __builtin_ia32_haddps when possible, but how can I be sure of that? I would have to disassemble the generated

make install in the klibc directory ends up doing include /.*.d which just happens to pick up root's .emacs.d directory on my machine which makes make barf (because its a directory). This patch makes sure that when DIR is not set we don't go poking around in /. Thanks, -Jim PS This message was initially bounced by (via SORBS) because my IP address is dynamic (it may technically

On Sun 21 Mar 2004 - 02:58:46 EST - James Couzens wrote: > Mail coming from motherfish-II.xiph.org is likely getting dropped due to > the following (which I pulled out of the headers of a piece of mail > after wondering where all my speex email suddenly disappeared off to: > > 2.8 RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB RBL: SORBS: sender is a abuseable web server - > [198.136.36.245 listed in