similar to: InterScan NT Alert

Hi Saverio, I found conflict: 172.16.1.10 00:50:56:1b:ba:5e VMware, Inc. 172.16.1.10 00:50:56:2b:12:e6 VMware, Inc. (DUP: 2) 172.16.1.10 00:50:56:2b:12:e6 VMware, Inc. (DUP: 3) 172.16.1.10 00:50:56:2b:12:e6 VMware, Inc. (DUP: 4) 172.16.1.10 00:50:56:2b:12:e6 VMware, Inc. (DUP: 5) So my assumptions were wrong ! :D Probably Virtual

Vuoi Davvero Guadagnare con Internet? Bene, salva su disco questa pagina per averla a portata di mano anche se il tuo PC non ? connesso a Internet, poi copia quanto segue in Word o in Blocco Note e stampalo, cos? lo potrai leggere con pi? attenzione. Questo Sistema ? diverso da tutti gli altri, quindi non essere precipitoso nel valutarlo senza averlo compreso a fondo, ma ti assicuro che

On 21/03/2018 11:44 AM, Stefano Sofia wrote: > Dear list users, > let me ask you this trivial question. I worked on that for a long time, by now. > Suppose to have a data frame with NAs and to sum some columns with rowSums: > > df <- data.frame(A = runif(10), B = runif(10), C = rnorm(10)) > df[1, ] <- NA > rowSums(df[ , which(names(df) %in%

put map untrusted to domain = yes in smb.conf and strarted winbind. Now work !!!  nice -n '-20'  yes 'thanks a lot' Buda Il 11/01/19 10:56, Christian Naumer via samba ha scritto: > How about setting: > > map untrusted to domain = yes > > The default changed here. But it would still help if we could see the > smb.conf as the big difference with 4.8 is that

Receiver, InterScan has detected virus(es) in the e-mail attachment. PWGSC-TPSGC Date: Thu, 10 May 2001 01:20:50 -0400 (Eastern Daylight Time) Method: Mail From: <john@plkwvreugdenhil.nl> To: <samba@lists.samba.org> File: homepage.HTML.vbs Action: clean failed - deleted Virus: VBS_HOMEPAGE.A

I gave you the most simple option. And the difference is. myserverdomain\username works only on that server. (myserverdomain) .\username works on any server where the loginname and password are the same. There is NO other option for you that i know off. (sorry) Yes.. the other option is, setup an AD domain. Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba

Should not the result be NULL if you have removed the NA with na.rm=TRUE ? B. > On Mar 21, 2018, at 11:44 AM, Stefano Sofia <stefano.sofia at regione.marche.it> wrote: > > Dear list users, > let me ask you this trivial question. I worked on that for a long time, by now. > Suppose to have a data frame with NAs and to sum some columns with rowSums: > > df <-

Dear list users, I have to aggregate wind direction data (wd) using a function that requires also a second input variable, wind speed (ws). This is the function that I need to use: my_fun <- function(wd1, ws1){ u_component <- -ws1*sin(2*pi*wd1/360) v_component <- -ws1*cos(2*pi*wd1/360) mean_u <- mean(u_component, na.rm=T) mean_v <- mean(v_component, na.rm=T) mean_wd

How about setting: map untrusted to domain = yes The default changed here. But it would still help if we could see the smb.conf as the big difference with 4.8 is that winbind needs to run now. This might also do something like this. Regards Christian Am 11.01.19 um 10:46 schrieb L.P.H. van Belle via samba: > I gave you the most simple option. > > And the difference is. >

Surely the result of summation of non-existent values is not defined, is it not? And since the NA values have been _removed_, there's nothing left to sum over. In fact, pretending the the result in that case is zero would appear audacious, no? Cheers, Boris > On Mar 21, 2018, at 12:58 PM, Jeff Newmiller <jdnewmil at dcn.davis.ca.us> wrote: > > What do you mean by

Dear list users, let me ask you this trivial question. I worked on that for a long time, by now. Suppose to have a data frame with NAs and to sum some columns with rowSums: df <- data.frame(A = runif(10), B = runif(10), C = rnorm(10)) df[1, ] <- NA rowSums(df[ , which(names(df) %in% c("A","B"))], na.rm=T) If all the elements of the selected columns are NA, rowSums

?s 15:51 de 13/05/2023, Stefano Sofia escreveu: > Dear list users, > > I have to aggregate wind direction data (wd) using a function that requires also a second input variable, wind speed (ws). > > This is the function that I need to use: > > > my_fun <- function(wd1, ws1){ > > u_component <- -ws1*sin(2*pi*wd1/360) > v_component <-

What do you mean by "should not"? NULL means "missing object" in R. The result of the sum function is always expected to be numeric... so NA_real or NA_integer could make sense as possible return values. But you cannot compute on NULL so no, that doesn't work. See the note under the "Value" section of ?sum as to why zero is returned when all inputs are removed.

BANNED CONTENTS ALERT Il sistema di scansione ha rilevato un problema in una email presumibilmente inviata da Lei -> (<klibc at zytor.com>), per il seguente destinatario: -> chic81900r at istruzione.it La consegna del messaggio non e' potuta avvenire Il messaggio e' stato bloccato in quanto contenente delle componenti che violano le policy di accesso al sistema di posta

I see: consistency with additive identity. That makes sense. Thanks. B. > On Mar 21, 2018, at 1:22 PM, peter dalgaard <pdalgd at gmail.com> wrote: > > No. The empty sum is zero. Adding it to another sum should not change it. Nothing audacious about that. This is consistent; other definitions just cause trouble. > > -pd > >> On 21 Mar 2018, at 18:05 , Boris

Hello, I've found this information about asterisk and LDAP: http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/index.php?page=Asterisk+LDAP which can be out of date. I'm trying this http://www.mezzo.net/asterisk/app_ldap.html however I'm facing the same problems as this unanswered: http://forums.digium.com/viewtopic.php?p=42591&sid=05e1d00ab6f9848f4e7b6 39d66cc6d79 Does anybody know how to solve this

No. The empty sum is zero. Adding it to another sum should not change it. Nothing audacious about that. This is consistent; other definitions just cause trouble. -pd > On 21 Mar 2018, at 18:05 , Boris Steipe <boris.steipe at utoronto.ca> wrote: > > Surely the result of summation of non-existent values is not defined, is it not? And since the NA values have been _removed_,

"I see: consistency with additive identity. " Ummm, well: > 1+NULL numeric(0) > sum(1,NULL) [1] 1 Of course, there could well be something here I don't get, but that doesn't look very consistent to me. However, as I said privately, so long as the corner case behavior is documented, which it is, I don't care. Cheers, Bert Bert Gunter "The trouble with

Norton AntiVirus ha trovato un virus in un allegato inviato da (samba@samba.org) a Segreteria Direzione. Per garantire che i destinatari possano utilizzare i file inviati, eseguire una scansione dei virus, ripulire eventuali file infetti e inviare di nuovo l'allegato. Allegato: documento.pif Nome virus: W32.Netsky.X@mm Azione intrapresa: Ripulisci non riuscito : Elimina riuscito : Stato

Symantec AntiVirus ha trovato un virus in un allegato inviato da (r-bugs@r-project.org <r-bugs@r-project.org>) a info@nuovaedart.it. Per garantire che i destinatari possano utilizzare i file inviati, eseguire una scansione dei virus, ripulire eventuali file infetti e inviare di nuovo l'allegato. Allegato: talk.zip Nome virus: W32.Netsky.B@mm Azione intrapresa: Ripulisci non riuscito