similar to: Undeliverable mail: hello

Failed to deliver to ''richard@masalink.org'' SMTP module(domain @196.38.110.35:masalink.org) reports: host mail.masalink.org says: 550 Requested action not taken: mailbox unavailable -------------- next part -------------- Skipped content of type message/delivery-status-------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type:

Your message was not delivered to the following recipients: opensparc-interest at sun.com: 550 5.7.1 <opensparc-interest at sun.com>... Access denied -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: text/rfc822-headers Size: 1086 bytes Desc: not available Url :

Failed to deliver to ''<cni-announce@cni.org>'' LIST module(list CNI-ANNOUNCE) reports: You cannot post messages because you are not subscribed to this list -------------- next part -------------- Skipped content of type message/delivery-status-------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: text/rfc822-headers Size:

On Sun, Jan 04, 2015 at 03:14:51PM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote: > > dmarc_moderation_action (privacy): Action to take when anyone posts > > to the list from a domain with a DMARC Reject/Quarantine Policy. > > > > Wrap Message -- applies the "from_is_list Wrap Message" transformation > > to these messages. > > > > from_is_list

>>> On 02.03.12 at 10:04, EMEA1.EMEA1-MH.GATEWAY wrote: > The message that you sent was undeliverable to the following: > > jake.wires@citrix.com (550 #5.1.0 Address rejected jake.wires@citrix.com) > daniel.stodden@citrix.com (550 #5.1.0 Address rejected daniel.stodden@citrix.com) > Who is considered the maintainer(s) of blktap2 code these days? Jan

All, Having problems terminating to a Nuvox PRI, the tech at Nuvox is saying Asterisk is transmitting in CCITT (aka ITU?) when they're expecting (and will only accept) ANSI. The question is, is there a simple way to change this or am I stuck with rewriting code? I googled and checked the mailing list and found nothing, I could be barking up the wrong tree I guess. PRI is not my forte.

This concerns the contributed package "concord". Sorry to bother you with it, but my attempt to contact the author/maintainer failed (see below). Perhaps you can forward it, or let me know where to send it. Regards, Rob Kushler ------------------------------------------------------ This is the Postfix program at host tak.itd.uts.edu.au. I'm sorry to have to inform you that

Hi Guys, I've already posted this to the postfix mailing list and they made sure the error as the title suggest was generated by dovecot and not the other way around. I have an almost perfectly working multi domain mail server running dovecot+postfix+mysql+postfixadmin behind pfsense, when we transferred office, issues arose, suddenly users using email clients like thunderbird/outlook

Hi, This is just a pre-warning. I am in a process of implementing a filter that would automatically unsubscribe email addresses that cause permanent delivery errors, mostly user-unknown. Addresses that return "host unknown" and similiar will be placed into removal queue for 1 week from which they would be removed upon successful delivery. Otherwise, if after 1 week the error does not

Your message To: ben.discoe at intel.com Subject: Re: Submited (004756-3463) Sent: Mon, 2 Jun 2003 00:48:50 -0700 did not reach the following recipient(s): ben.discoe at intel.com on Mon, 2 Jun 2003 00:48:02 -0700 The recipient name is not recognized MSEXCH:IMS:Intel:Americas01:FMSMSX019 0 (000C05A6) Unknown Recipient

This message was created automatically by mail delivery software. Delivery failed for the following recipients(s): jtai@altera.com The message you sent contained an attachment which the recipient has chosen to block. Usually these sort of attachments are blocked to prevent malicious software from being sent to the recipient in question. The name(s) of the blocked file(s) follow:

***** SECURITY NOTICE ***** An attachment was sent by you, in the message "test", that violates Kimberly-Clark's E-mail security policy regarding potentially dangerous attachments. The offending message has been dropped and will not be delivered. Unsafe attachments include: SHS, VBS, VBA, VBX, JS, JSE, VBE, COM, SCR, PIF and EXE file types and message/partial MIME content (split

Mail delivery failed: recipient does not exist. Tip: Did you mean @iribarren.net? --- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/ To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'vorbis-request@xiph.org' containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body. No subject is needed. Unsubscribe messages sent to the list will

Your message was not delivered to the following recipients: nogin@hft.e-technik.tu-muenchen.de: User unknown -------------- next part -------------- Skipped content of type message/delivery-status-------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: bridge@osdlab.org Subject: Re: mail lyGN6wHO Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 12:55:34 +0000

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Good morning dovecot-community, I noticed a strange log-entry since the last day: Nov 7 08:34:42 hetzner postfix/lmtp[3764]: 61CB01A3938: to=<jg+introversion at larptreff.de>, relay=mail.larptreff.de[private/dovecot-lmtp], delay=0.05, delays=0.01/0.01/0.02/0.01, dsn=4.4.2, status=undeliverable (lost connection with

Hi Linfeng, On 06/02/17 02:51 PM, Linfeng Zhang wrote: > However, the critical thing is that all the states in each stage when > processing input[i] are reused by the next input[i+1]. That is > input[i+1] must wait input[i] for 1 stage, and input[i+2] must wait > input[i+1] for 1 stage, etc. That is indeed the tricky part... and the one I think you could do slightly differently. If

Hello, I have a 3 server asterisk configuration where one asterisk (say A) (v 1.4.25) has a digiuim card connected to E1 from which calls are routed to another asterisk server (B) (1.6.0.9) over IAX trunk from which calls get routed to third server (C) (1.6.0.9) again via IAX trunk. SIP clients are connected to third server. A is the PSTN termination server, B runs the menu and AGI and C is

Hi Linfeng, On 06/02/17 07:18 PM, Linfeng Zhang wrote: > This is a great idea. But the order (psEncC->shapingLPCOrder) can be > configured to 12, 14, 16, 20 and 24 according to complexity parameter. > > It's hard to get a universal function to handle all these orders > efficiently. Any suggestions? I can think of two ways of handling larger orders. The obvious one is

Hi Jean-Marc, Attached is the silk_warped_autocorrelation_FIX_neon() which implements your idea. Speed improvement vs the previous optimization: Complexity 0-4: Doesn't call this function. Complexity 5: 2.1% (order = 16) Complexity 6: 1.0% (order = 20) Complexity 8: 0.1% (order = 24) Complexity 10: 0.1% (order = 24) Code size of silk_warped_autocorrelation_FIX_neon() changes from 2,644

> > I realize this is a micro-op saving a single cycle. But this reduces the instruction count, one less > instr to decode in a potentially hot path. If this all makes sense, and seems like a reasonable addition > to llvm, would it make sense to implement this as a supplemental LSR formula, or as a separate pass? This seems reasonable to me so long as rbx has no other uses that