similar to: sampling rate in speex

Thank you for such a quick response. The only reason I started with Char buffers is because WaveIn and WaveOut on Windows XP accept/emit WAVEHDR structures, which store audio data in LPSTR, which is Char*. typedef struct { LPSTR lpData; DWORD dwBufferLength; ... } WAVEHDR; When I was going from Char to float and back looked very wrong to me as well, but I was just not

Hi, i know this question has already been asked, i've checked mailing list logs but ... I didn't figure out the solution for my question. I want to use basic functionnality of speex, only VAD, no pre/post filter, even no VBR. But i *really* want to use less mem/cpu i can. So in which format should i pass data to speex_encode(_int) , float or short ? I quickly looked at the source code

Hi, I'm using speex 1.1.10 and writing a program similar to sampleenc. I need to use the fixed point library as I'm eventually porting to ARM processor but I encountered a problem with speex_encode_int(), which I used in place of speex_encode(). I gave it a short instead of a float (manual says it takes a short for the audio - 2nd parameter) but the compiler says it could not convert the

Hi all, i've to encode voice from a voicemodem. I choose speex 1.0.5 for its quality in voice encoding. I've tried to implement an encoder but unsuccesfully. Here's my code: /* ============ SPEEX stream ENCODER ============================================ */ int SPEEX_EncodePCM(struct _IDA_ClientSocket *IDA,char *buffer,unsigned char *PCM,int num_samples) { /* buffer point to the

Alright noted, I changed me code so that the state is created in the constructor and destroyed in the destructor of the object. However I'm still getting the same issue although I'm sure that would have bit me sooner or later. The new code is as follows. virtual Enigma::u8* Encode(Enigma::u8* inputBuffer,size_t inputSize, size_t& outputSize) { short *in=(short*)inputBuffer;

Changing from using floats to shorts did fix the high pitched tone problem. I'm having other problems but I'll look into it more first. SteveK wrote: > > On May 21, 2006, at 6:33 PM, Kevin Jenkins wrote: > >> When I just copy the microphone input buffer to the output buffer the >> sound plays OK. But if I encode and decode the buffer through Speex I >>

Hi All, I'm very new to speex and in fact handling audio at all, it seems I have run in to a problem I seem unable to fix. I'm trying to take audio from a microphone using alsa, then encode it as speex and save to disk. I have been wondering if it has something to do with endian type, but speexenc and speexdec works fine. Currently I have the following setup: Platform:

I'm having trouble with a Speex VOIP effort ... my first use of Speex. My development platform is Windows XP, but I intend to bring this up on OS X as well. At the moment, I send across speex frames (say 4 per packet... a configurable setting), and the settings of both encoder and decoder are simply fixed in code at the moment (wideband, short format input). I am fairly confident that I

I'm only doing one frame using speex_encode_int greatly simplifies my code I'm not sure why the sample I was working off of was converting the shorts to floats then calling the other encode/decode methods. Based off of your suggestions I tried the following but I get the same result. virtual Enigma::u8* Encode(Enigma::u8* inputBuffer,size_t inputSize, size_t& outputSize) {

On Wed, Nov 17, 2004 at 09:05:05AM +0900, Jean-Marc Valin wrote: > Why do you want your app to with with 1.1.4 in the first place. It's a > old unstable version and its API has been changed since then. > ie. Flavio, please upgrade to the recent 1.1.6 release. In your code, you will need to change the follwing line (for the 1.1.x build only): > > /* Encode the frame */

First let me introduce myself: Sr Computer Scientist 20+ yrs SW/HW development Audio Rookie < 60 days Intel based computer Soundblaster 128 PCI Linux Fedora Core 2 ALSA - Advanced Linux Sound Architecture ALSA provides the audio and MIDI functionality to the Linux operating system as of Fedora Core 2 and is the future of Linux (so I have been told) http://www.alsa-project.org/ I have read

On Mon, Apr 19, 2004 at 02:46:44AM -0400, Jean-Marc Valin wrote: > OK, I'll try to do *something* about it. It'll be either "support the > 1.0 ABI" or "make sure the link will break". While the former would be > nice, I'm not sure I want to really want to force 1.2 to have the same > ABI as 1.0.x. More on this when I have some time to think about it.

Hello, I know my question has been asked before because I spent the last week searching the web for how to use Speex in combination with WaveIn/WaveOut and I ran into a few posts, but none of them answer the question. There is still a lot of confusion how to use WaveIn/WaveOut and Speex by junior developers such as myself. Even after examining code for SpeexDec and SpeexEnc, I cannot get clear

Hi list ! I'm Patrick, a french student. i am developping a kind of softphone for pocket PC using speex. Sorry in advance for my bad english. Till now, i had good results, but now i've a problem with encoding. so to summarize, here is a short description of my work : I'm working on pocket pc I'm developing a GUI in C# I'm developing a dll in C++ which use speex

Hi, I am writing a program that should be able to compile using speex version 1.0.1 and speex version 1.1.4, but a I am getting some trouble to encode with one version e decode using the other. The program is taking care of the change in both speex_encode and speex_decode. The sample being coded or decoded has changed from float to short. To test it, I have modified the sampleenc.c that

Assuming one prefers to use the speex_encode_int() and speex_decode_int() when available, but fallback to speex_encode() and speex_decode() if an older version if the lib is installed, how does one best make the determination? The only thing I can see to do is call speex_init_header() and look at the result. Even at compile time it seems one must compile a test app that outputs that data and then

Hi, I am using speex 1.2beta2 on a narrowband 16-bit, 8khz system that has a severe program space problem and will not fit speex in its normal operation. In an attempt to shrink speex I placed a breakpoint in every function and ran a decode and encode and removed the breakpoints that I hit. in the functions that had a breakpoint that I didn't hit I commented out those functions (as well as

Hi, I am trying to find information about the performance of speex on various processors, platforms and operating systems. If anyone has this information about the benchmarking for speex plz share the same. Thanks Bhushan

On Mon, 17 Jan 2005, Jean-Marc Valin wrote: > > 0) Is it possible to manipulate voice data representing more than > > the frame size of encoder (this seems possible in Speex Java code > > used until now). > > Speex itself manipulates audio one frame at the time, but what you do > after that if up to you. > What about the section 4.5 of the

Hello, I intend to make a speex port for freescale DSP56F800/E. I downloaded the source code, but I not realize which function are called in which order for encode after calling speex_encode (or speex_encode_int) and speex_decode (or speex_decode_int). Could anybody help me on this? Thanks in advance Alexandre Penna