similar to: Blackfin inline assembler and VisualDSP++ toolchain

-----Original Message----- From: Jean-Marc Valin [mailto:jean-marc.valin@usherbrooke.ca] Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2007 11:17 PM To: Michael Shatz Cc: speex-dev@xiph.org Subject: Re: [Speex-dev] Blackfin inline assembler and VisualDSP++ toolchain Michael Shatz a ?crit : >>> Actually, you're the first I know using the VisualDSP++ toolchain >>> :-) >> >> I guess

From: Jim Crichton [mailto:jim.crichton@comcast.net] Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2007 10:47 PM > >For TI DSPs, I used a private memory array rather than the C stack, and a >debug patch in stack_alloc.h to measure the scratch usage: > >#if 1 >extern char *spxGlobalScratchFree; >#define ALLOC(var, size, type) (var = PUSH(stack, size, type),

> >Actually, you're the first I know using the VisualDSP++ toolchain :-) > I guess that's because speex has pretty big memory footprint. So developers that integrate speex tend to have plenty of RAM and once one has plenty of RAM he could install biggish OS. And between biggish OSes for Blackfin the most popular choice is uCLinux. And ucLinux works best with gnu tools. Something

Hi Jean-Marc I'm trying to integrate your speex codec on our custom Blackfin board. The board is not uCLinux compatible and there is no chance that it will ever be. I am using ADI-supplied VisualDSP++ IDE and corresponding toolchain. As long as I am compiling "C"-only version of the library everything is fine. VisualDSP++ produces working library. There is only one not so minor

-----Original Message----- From: Robin Getz [mailto:rgetz@blackfin.uclinux.org] Sent: Saturday, June 16, 2007 12:11 AM To: Michael Shatz Cc: speex-dev@xiph.org Subject: Re: [Speex-dev] Blackfin inline assembler and VisualDSP++ toolchain >On Wed 13 Jun 2007 12:37, Michael Shatz pondered: >> >> Hi Jean-Marc >> >> I'm trying to integrate your speex codec on our

>-----Original Message----- >From: Robin Getz [mailto:rgetz@blackfin.uclinux.org] >Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2007 9:35 PM > > >On Tue 19 Jun 2007 13:00, Michael Shatz pondered: >> Robin Getz wrote: >> >I never met any hardware that gcc could not run code on. toolchains have >> >nothing do with embedded OSes. >> >> That's true. Add some

Hi all, I'm trying to run speex on the Blackfin processor. I'm not familiar with programming/compiling/linking at all, but I guess the first thing I need is libspeex compiled for Blackfin, so that my program can use the library functions. I've downloaded the source files (version 1.1.10) from www.speex.org and I've been trying to compile libspeex from within VisualDSP++, but it

Hi Jean, First, I would like to thank for the prompt reply. Basically, what I have to do is to run a speex coder/decoder on a Blackfin processor, on top of the microC/OS II kernel. I wish I could use uclinux, since I'm familiar with Linux, but this doesn't depend on me. You said that the assembly code is written for gcc, not for VisualDSP++. Furthermore, in the link you sent me, the

To close debian bug #271052, http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=271052 I went ahead and did the following: $ diff -u ../original/speex-1.1.6/libspeex/nb_celp.c libspeex/nb_celp.c --- ../original/speex-1.1.6/libspeex/nb_celp.c 2004-07-15 01:16:52.000000000 -0400 +++ libspeex/nb_celp.c 2005-02-27 08:24:49.000000000 -0500 @@ -1746,6 +1746,21 @@ st->submodeSelect =

hi Jean-Marc, I just updated from svn and it looks like there are some errors in the speex.mmp file. the filters.c is duplicated, and the fft/kiss.c files are still missing.. /alfred Jean-Marc Valin wrote: > Applied in svn. Thanks. > > Jean-Marc > > Alfred E. Heggestad a ?crit : >> hi, >> >> this patch should fix the symbian build. >> >> >>

Hi, I think the (small) readme has been accidentally omitted from the tarball. You can get it at http://svn.xiph.org/trunk/speex/README.blackfin Note however that all the assembly is written for gcc, not VisualDSP++. Jean-Marc Le jeudi 29 septembre 2005 ? 21:24 +0000, Adriano Vilela Barbosa a ?crit : > Hi all, > > I'm trying to run speex on the Blackfin processor. I'm not

Hi, when I compile with FIXED_DEBUG enabled, I get an error -- both when make tries to build testenc.o and when I try to link my app against the speex lib: lorenz@panelmaker:~/Blackfin/tests/speex_loopthrough$ make bfin-uclinux-gcc -c -g -I/home/lorenz/include -o main.o main.c bfin-uclinux-gcc -gl -elf2flt -L/home/lorenz/lib -o speex_through main.o -lspeex_debug -lspeexdsp -lm

Greetings to All! Now I am trying to run speex on TI DSP... I need only coder+decoder+AEC. Bitrate 8000bps. Building with floating point support. What can i do, to reduce RAM consumption? I mean very serious RAM optimisations. Deleting not used structure fields, etc... May be I can do something with alloc... Help me to determine that it is possible to throw out. What is best result(in RAM

hi, this patch should fix the symbian build. /alfred -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: speex-symbian2.patch Type: text/x-patch Size: 2669 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/speex-dev/attachments/20061115/5ac4915e/speex-symbian2.bin

Hi Jean-Marc, after some problems with getting svn to work here I finally made it. Problem is, you write that I cannot use libspeex and libspeexdsp at the same time now -- because I use a "live" system (mic-in -> speex_enc -> speex_dec -> headphone out) and I can run the AD1836 audio codec on 48 kHz only, I cannot use my program now (because I use speex resampling...) So I

Hi, I'm using the Speex codec on my Blackfin-based board, and plain-C performance is pretty poor. Decoder is OK (something 25 MIPS for wide-band). But Encoder is not (wide-band quality 8, complexity 1): - 162 MIPS with Analog-Devices lib - 128 MIPS with 1.2beta2 (faster but not working) I don't worry that much, as it's not the optimized version, and everything is running in SDRAM.

Jean-Marc, Frank, I have stumbled across a similar situation regarding optimization. I seem to have a similar setup as Frank does with a fixed 48khz in and out. The wideband mode and ultra-wideband modes are really what I?m looking for. I have a test application that reads audio, downsample to 16kHz (or 32kHz), speex encode, speex decode, upsample back to 48kHz, and playback. If I remove

Hi I'm trying to integrate your speex codec on our custom Blackfin board and without uCLinux. I am using ADI-supplied VisualDSP++ IDE and corresponding toolchain. My question is: Is there anybody who ported speex with enabled BFIN_ASM to VisualDSP++ ? Best Regards, Stefan Voss -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hello Jean-Marc, > Got any luck with the Blackfin stuff? One thing I forgot mentioning that > would probably help a lot in narrowing down the bug is to simply disable > assembly functions one by one and see which one breaks Speex. sorry that I didn't reply for some days. Unfortunately I had some other serious problems with my software which are not related to Speex. I hope to solve

Hello everybody, I'm currently trying to run speex on the Blackfin (BF-537) STAMP evaluation board unter uCLinux. Using 1.2 beta 3, I encountered problems when activating the Blackfin assembler optimizations. Without optimizations for blackfin, i.e. calling ./configure --enable-fixed-point --host=bfin-uclinux everything seems to work fine. But when I add the --enable-blackfin-asm flag to