Displaying 20 results from an estimated 600 matches similar to: "speex1.2-beta2 and noise suppression problem"
2010 Mar 18
0
Errors compiling speex1.2-rc1 in Symbian 3th edition SDK
Hi, I'm trying to compile speex1.2-rc1 for Symbian 3th edition.
I get some errors:
***Invoking bldmake command
perl.exe -S bldmake.pl bldfiles winscw
\Users\Maurizio\University\ProgettoInterdisciplinare\speex-1.2rc1\speex-1.2rc1\symbian\BLD.INF FATAL ERROR(S):
\Users\Maurizio\University\ProgettoInterdisciplinare\speex-1.2rc1\speex-1.2rc1\symbian\BLD.INF(37) : Exported source file
2019 Sep 30
0
New package 'backbone' for extracting significant edges from a weighted graph
Hello R users,
I am excited to introduce a new package for R which is now available on CRAN called ?backbone?.
The package can be found here: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/backbone/index.html
The backbone package provides methods for extracting from a weighted graph a binary or signed backbone that retains only the significant edges. The user may input a weighted graph, or a bipartite
2019 Sep 30
0
New package 'backbone' for extracting significant edges from a weighted graph
Hello R users,
I am excited to introduce a new package for R which is now available on CRAN called ?backbone?.
The package can be found here: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/backbone/index.html
The backbone package provides methods for extracting from a weighted graph a binary or signed backbone that retains only the significant edges. The user may input a weighted graph, or a bipartite
2007 Dec 06
2
Some question about speexcodex 1.2 beta2 on linux
Hi,
I am an user of speex codec.Can I ask some question about the speexcodec 1.2beta2
on installed to linux(fedora 6) thanks!
After I downloaded the latest version of codec
then I type the commands to install :
configure -prefix=/home/...../test -enable-shared -enable-static
make
make install
then I try to compile my encode.c
here is the encode.c of mine:
=====================================
2009 Sep 02
3
voice sound like robot voice :)
hy,
here is my speex encoder/decoder .. the sampleRate i use is 16000 and
quality,complexity are at 5.
can someone take a look in to the code and see if there is something that is
making that robot voice
here is a link to colored and numbered code, same as below
http://barvanjekode.gama.us/temp/1257361243.html
thanx.
code
-----------------------
#include "codec.h"
2009 Sep 03
1
Speex-dev Digest, Vol 64, Issue 2
hy,
recording and playback is working perfectly without speex.
i have try to set samplerat from 6000 to 441000 and quality from 1 to 10 sam
with complexy, but the best i can get is with 16000 samplerate, 5quality and
3complexy .. but still, the voice that came out is annoying, artificial,
robot ,...
Lp, Tim
+--------------------------+
| email: rico at gama.us |
| www: http://gama.us
2008 Dec 11
1
preprocessor VAD only rocognize between silence and not silence
Hello,
in my project im using speex 1.2rc1 and the preprocessor VAD seems to
only separate complete silence from not complete silence frames.
The Speex Manual, you can read "The voice activity detector (VAD)
provided by the preprocessor is more advanced than the one directly
provided in the codec."
but if you go to the source code in preprocess.c line 995 "/* FIXME:
This VAD
2010 Jul 20
2
[SPAM] [BombData][alltestmode] Re: Speex Echo Cancellation
As for me - speex_echo_cancellation is a better choise. Try using it in
capture thread instead
of those speex_echo_capture and speex_echo_playback functions.
And please, describe your problem in details. Cause the fact that you
"didn get echo cancellation"
doesn't mean you are doing smth wrong.
Regards,
Anton A. Shpakovsky
-----Original Message-----
From: speex-dev-bounces at
2010 Jul 20
0
[SPAM] [BombData][alltestmode] Re: Speex Echo Cancellation
Anton A. Shpakovsky <saa <at> tomsksoft.com> writes:
>
> As for me - speex_echo_cancellation is a better choise. Try using it in
> capture thread instead
> of those speex_echo_capture and speex_echo_playback functions.
>
> And please, describe your problem in details. Cause the fact that you
> "didn get echo cancellation"
> doesn't mean you are
2009 Sep 03
0
voice sound like robot voice :)
hy,
recording and playback without speex is working perfectly
Lp, Tim
+--------------------------+
| email: rico at gama.us |
| www: http://gama.us |
|--------------------------|
| tel: 00386 31 457 627 |
+--------------------------+
2009/9/2 Tim Rijavec <rico at gama.us>
> hy,
>
> here is my speex encoder/decoder .. the sampleRate i use is 16000 and
>
2015 Jun 24
3
Change fallback mount file automatically?
On 24 Jun 2015, at 15:33, Martin Jangowski wrote:
> I regularly broadcast with 48kBit streaming rate (mp3, mono, 44kHz).
> My fallback-file is a 244kBit, stereo, 44kHz, mp3 file. Works like a
> charme....
That depends on the player, if it works you are lucky. It might not work
for other formats or with some players.
2010 Jul 20
1
[BombData][alltestmode] Re: [SPAM] [BombData][alltestmode] Re: Speex EchoCancellation
Well, I'm not a professional in AEC theory, but what I've mentioned is:
speex_echo_state_init(20, 320*10) - frame size should correspond to
20ms. At your sampling rate (16000hz) is should be 16K*0.02 = 320. The
same I can notice about echo tail. 100ms: 16000*0.3 = 4800, not 3200 as
you has. But that's not crucial I think. Just wanna you get the point.
"Internally,
2008 Dec 15
0
preprocessor VAD only rocognize between silence andnot silence
Jesus,
Unfortunately, FFT and magic algorithms don't work (yet?). You
might want to try this if you're not satisfied with Speex VAD:
http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/speex-dev/2008-August/006860.html
It won't perform any miracles, but I think it works pretty well
and is easy to tweak.
Tom
>---- Original Message ----
>From: jmorion at toomeeting.com
>To: speex-dev at
2004 Sep 10
2
Re: nice idea
constant prediction
see this page
http://flac.sourceforge.net/format.html
oversampling.. i maean digitally change the wave file rate form 44khz to 440
khz
it make next sample easyer predictable
if i'll found my old work i'll tell you how much compression i could achieve
2004 Aug 06
4
Optimizing speex for 44.1kHz
> The cost of down-sampling, if done efficiently, is probably less then
> the cost difference between 32 kHz and 44.1 kHz so it's probably worth
> it. If you don't care about standard sampling rate, you could even to a
> 2/3 conversion which would get you 29.4 kHz...
I'm curious why not just sample at a lower rate if it's just VoIP
anyway? My opinion is that 44kHz
2005 Sep 22
1
Noise :-(
Hi all,
i use speex preprocessor features in this way:
===================================
#define NN 160 /* 20msec di audio */
...
int tbc=0,c,d,ret;
spx_int16_t TEMP_Buffer[NN];
char DLECODE;
/* Inizializza il preprocessore Speex se non inizializzato */
if(Modem->speex_pp_state == NULL) {
Modem->speex_pp_state = speex_preprocess_state_init(NN,AUDIO_SAMPLERATE);
}
2004 Aug 06
5
icecast encoders?
On Fri, 16 Nov 2001, Jerome Alet wrote:
> one thing that would be nice in DarkIce would be to allow the user to pass
> specific reencoding options for each server, e.g. DarkIce could acquire
> the audio in stereo and send it to a server in mono and in stereo to
> another server, which is AFAICT impossible today.
I agree! Also, something I've been looking for is a way to pull
2004 Aug 06
2
vbr and music
I know speex is not supposed to do a great job compressing music, but
I've noticed that the new VBR code chokes completely when you try to
compress horns. I've placed a particularly offensive example up at
http://www.utdallas.edu/~matthias/ . Take a look at a-16m*{ogg,spx}.
a.ogg is the first minute of an ogg created from the source media (in
44khz stereo). The rest have been mixed down
2007 Apr 03
1
Speex ARM4 patch
The attached patch eliminates some warnings while compiling for ARM4
targets. It also simplifies the asm constraints a bit. Now we can use
the ARM4 optimisations when compiling for PortalPlayer targets in Rockbox.
Cheers,
Dan
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: speex_arm4.patch
Type: text/x-diff
Size: 1550 bytes
Desc: not available
Url :
2005 Dec 06
1
ARM4 filter code
I have found that filter_mem2 fixed point does not match the inlined
assembly version for arm4. Looking closer there appears to be an off by
one error. It occurs when setting the value of mem at the end of the
inner loop. In the C fixed point version this is done with a subtract.
In the arm4 version instead of multiplying den by yi, it is multipled by
nyi and then an add is done. This