similar to: Re: XIPH Internet-Drafts

Peter Saint-Andre wrote: > On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 03:58:17PM -0700, Ralph Giles wrote: >> On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 03:20:05PM -0600, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: >> >>>>> Hi Luca, >>>>> >>>>> Thank you for working on the Theora and Vorbis drafts in the IETF's AVT >>>>> WG. Do you also plan to work on the Speex draft?

On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 03:58:17PM -0700, Ralph Giles wrote: > On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 03:20:05PM -0600, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: > > > >>Hi Luca, > > >> > > >>Thank you for working on the Theora and Vorbis drafts in the IETF's AVT > > >>WG. Do you also plan to work on the Speex draft? > > > > > >other people are working

Hi Jean-Marc, Alfred and Greg, Are you receiving the mails from IETF about draft-ietf-avt-rtp-speex The mails are not coming from AVT mailing list, but I think we are all 3 part of a minimal list (draft-ietf-avt-rtp-speex at tools.ietf.org) dedicated to latest discussion about the draft. I have answered some questions, but there are small changes and adaptation still required to the ietf

Do not forget to add the "Copying conditions" to the RFC. Check http://wiki.debian.org/NonFreeIETFDocuments That page contains a section titled "Template for RFC authors to release additional rights". To follow that guideline a section like the following should be added: x. Copying conditions The author(s) agree to grant third parties the irrevocable right to

Hi all We are about to send an updated version of the internet draft "RTP Payload Format for the Speex Codec" to the IETF AVT working group. Before submitting we would like your input, if you have any comments or input please send them to the mailing list. If we don't get any comments in 1 week (by 22. May 2007) we will go ahead and submit it to the IETF. Of course you can comment

Sorry for the delay. On 4/13/09, Alfred E. Heggestad <aeh at db.org> wrote: > Ivo, could you also review the updated memo-status/copyright notice, > located on page 1-2 ? Is this a new standard for writing Internet drafts? I've never seen it in other documents. Specifically, this part: "This document may not be modified, and derivative works of it may not be created,

On 3/30/09, Jean-Marc Valin <jean-marc.valin at usherbrooke.ca> wrote: > It seems to be related to debian, that doesn't like the fact that not > everyone is allowed to modify these documents. If it's that much > problem, I'd say just remove it. Guys, both the Vorbis RTP and the Ogg media types RFCs have this clause. It did not raise any problem. If there are problems

Looks good to me. Jean-Marc Alfred E. Heggestad a ?crit : > Hi > > Please find an updated version of the Speex I-D attached. The only > change is addition of the copyright conditions in Appendix A, > as requested by Ivo. > > Many thanks for your input. > > I will give you a few more days before submitting to AVT working group > > > /alfred > > Ivo

Just a heads-up, I received confirmation that Speex is now the default codec for the Jabber's Jingle VoIP protocol. While not the default in Google's Jabber, Speex has been reported to work on Google Talk as well as of last year. This information is not news breaking, but many people aren't aware of it yet, so spread the word. -Ivo

Jean-Marc Valin wrote: >> Also, we need to know why there is a "license" chapter (chapter 9) >> and we need to remove it because ietf don't like it... > > IIRC, the reason for the license is to make the document compatible with > the Debian licensing guidelines or something like that. > I would like to know if we should keep this additional license chapter

Hi I am currently trying to port speex v1.1.6 to a microcontroller with very limited memory (<64Kbyte RAM). what I found when initialising the encoder, a chunk of 32Kb was attempted to be alloced, which failed: src/nb_celp.c: void *nb_encoder_init(const SpeexMode *m) { /* snip */ st = (EncState*)speex_alloc(sizeof(EncState)+8000*sizeof(spx_sig_t)); /* snip */ } same goes for the

Hi! What happened to this document? Was it just left dying in the IETF system? Tor --- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/ To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'vorbis-dev-request@xiph.org' containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body. No subject is needed. Unsubscribe messages sent to the

On Mon, 2005-02-28 at 19:42 -0500, Jean-Marc Valin wrote: > > jean-marc: i think we can remove spx_sig_t *orig. > > but am not sure about exc2Buf. is it for extension? > > orig is already removed in SVN (which you should probably use). As for > exc2, it can be removed, but I'm not sure if you can just use exc > instead (maybe yes). > when removing "spx_sig_t

hi Jean-Marc, I just updated from svn and it looks like there are some errors in the speex.mmp file. the filters.c is duplicated, and the fft/kiss.c files are still missing.. /alfred Jean-Marc Valin wrote: > Applied in svn. Thanks. > > Jean-Marc > > Alfred E. Heggestad a ?crit : >> hi, >> >> this patch should fix the symbian build. >> >> >>

hi, this patch should fix the symbian build. /alfred -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: speex-symbian2.patch Type: text/x-patch Size: 2669 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/speex-dev/attachments/20061115/5ac4915e/speex-symbian2.bin

Ivo Emanuel Gon?alves wrote: > Just a heads-up, I received confirmation that Speex is now the default > codec for the Jabber's Jingle VoIP protocol. Which we hope to finalize soon for broader adoption. :) > While not the default in Google's Jabber, Speex has been reported to > work on Google Talk as well as of last year. BTW, my contacts on the Google Talk team report that

can you try git 1.5.x just in case that's the problem? Jean-Marc Alfred E. Heggestad a ?crit : > Jean-Marc Valin wrote: > <snip> >> >> git clone http://git.xiph.org/speex.git >> > > I am getting this error: > > [...] > walk 8e52b996f69c9419e3057ce0ed215fcb93a7be45 > walk 0f6a78e98ea5e7ccc4b81d1d7064a4a251d019d7 > walk

Jean-Marc and others, I'm meeting informally with the AVT WG on monday, and formally presenting our latest drafts on friday. I've been following the vorbis/theora draft efforts, but haven't paid much attention to the speex work. Can you brief me on what I should talk about, what we'd like feedback on, what's new and different from other drafts as far as the speex work goes?

hi this code gives me a warning: SpeexStereoState stereo = SPEEX_STEREO_STATE_INIT; modules/speex/mod.c: In function 'alloc': modules/speex/mod.c:61: warning: missing initializer modules/speex/mod.c:61: warning: (near initialization for 'stereo_init.reserved1') would it be possible to add this patch to you svn ? Index: include/speex/speex_stereo.h

i tried asterisk ilbc codec against kphone. when the call got connected, i started to immediately get these kind of message to the console: WARNING[14350]: File codec_ilbc.c, Line 141 (ilbctolin_framein): Huh? An ilbc frame that isn't a multiple of 52 bytes long from RTP (50)? WARNING[14350]: File codec_ilbc.c, Line 141 (ilbctolin_framein): Huh? An ilbc frame that isn't a multiple of